Teofimo Lopez vs. George Kambosos Jr. | DAZN - November 27, 2021

Who wins?

Poll ended at 27 Nov 2021, 08:28

Lopez - Decision
13
19%
Lopez - T/KO
42
62%
DRAW
1
1%
Kambosos - T/KO
6
9%
Kambosos - Decision
6
9%
 
Total votes: 68

Ruthless-RKO
Welterweight
Posts: 101073
Joined: 24 Apr 2016, 11:59

Re: Teofimo Lopez vs. George Kambosos Jr. - September 11, 2021

Post by Ruthless-RKO »

maverick23 wrote: 24 Jul 2021, 08:38
Bandog wrote: 24 Jul 2021, 08:17 Hope ticket sales improve, so Teo isn't sent into quarantine by uncle bob again.
Huh? Tickets aren’t on sale are they?!
And ticket takes have nothing to do with BOB. It’s Triller
H8Usernames
Featherweight
Posts: 1196
Joined: 21 Mar 2020, 21:02

Re: Teofimo Lopez vs. George Kambosos Jr. - September 11, 2021

Post by H8Usernames »

What's fair and square is that Triller get to hold this event in october in australia. Kambosos already made the flight once and Teo cancelled, now its Teo's turn to get on a plane. October-September there isn't a huge difference really so Trillers request is modest and the little shit Teo is just trying to escape on a technicality. What happens if the IBF sides with Teo is that the matter goes to the courts for a lengthy legal battle. Lomachenko was a decent fighter, this guy Kambosos also seems like a respectable fellow but the rest of these idiots in and near that division simply make me want to vomit, what a bunch of sissies and punks.
Ruthless-RKO
Welterweight
Posts: 101073
Joined: 24 Apr 2016, 11:59

Re: Teofimo Lopez vs. George Kambosos Jr. - September 11, 2021

Post by Ruthless-RKO »

Teofimo Lopez's Legal Team Increases Pressure For IBF To Rule On Lingering Kambosos Title Defense

Teofimo Lopez Jr. and his legal team will not budge on its stance for the lightweight champion’s next fight to happen sooner rather than later.

Patrick English, lead counsel for Lopez and manager David McWater submitted an updated filing with the International Boxing Federation (IBF), who continues to review all of the facts regarding the postponed title defense versus mandatory challenger George Kambosos Jr. The filing includes an updated complaint along with supporting evidence, as well as Certification letters from both Lopez and McWater—copies of which have been obtained by BS.com.

In each, the team collectively voices their displeasure over Triller Fight Club (identified as Proxima Event Productions, LLC) attempting to reschedule the aforementioned title fight beyond the scope of the original purse bid terms. The planned bout was moved from May 29 to June 5, then to June 19 before Lopez tested positive for Covid in forcing a postponement.

Lopez tested positive in June but produced a negative test near the end of the month. The reigning lineal/IBF/WBA/WBO champion professed a willingness to return on the first available fight date—which at the time was August 14, as announced by Trilller.

From there, came the suggestion of the fight landing on an already scheduled Pay-Per-View event on September 11 before Triller revealed that the fight was now heading to Australia in mid-October. The latter date is of concern to Lopez’s side for a number of reasons, including current COVID protocol with significant portions of Australia under lockdown, along with what Lopez’s legal team refers to as continued bait-and-switch tactics.

“At his point we draw a distinction as to what Mr. Lopez must do as opposed to what he is willing to do,” English notes in a 32-page document filed with the IBF. “We do not need to argue over whether Mr. Lopez must agree to and extension, because he is willing to do so. He is willing to reset the clock, so to speak, beginning on the date he was cleared to fight.

“That would have given Triller/ Proxima 15 days to submit a contract which would be in accord with the standard IBF contract for a bout to be held within 90 days. Triller/ Proxima first proposed August 14 at Madison Square Garden. That would have been acceptable. Then it proposed September 11. That too would have been acceptable. Both dates fall within 90 days of the reset date of June 29. Yet no contract was proffered for either date.”

The September 11 date was to have Lopez’s bout with Kambosos (19-0, 10KOs) paired up with an exhibition bout between Oscar De La Hoya and former UFC champion Vitor Belfort. The event was originally billed to take place in Las Vegas but will now air live on Pay-Per-View from Staples Center in Los Angeles.

Lopez-Kambosos was—as argued by Lopez through his attorney—used as part of the early promotion for De La Hoya-Belfort. Yet in lieu of a contract confirm the rescheduled date, Triller instead pushed the fight back further and out of the United States entirely. The location and its renewed Covid crisis is less concerning from a legal standpoint than honoring the parameters of the original purse bid won by Triller Fight Club on February 25.

“Putting aside completely for the moment the Covid crisis which is occurring in Australia, a purse bid is not an open ended option, though Triller/Proxima would have it so,” argues English. “They could have promoted the bout on August 14, a date within the 90 days and which was acceptable to Mr. Lopez. T

hey could have promoted it on September 11, a second date it proposed. The sold pay per view for that date. Yet again no contract came. Thus we have May 29, June 5, August 14, and September 11, a series of "bait and switch" moves which would do the most unscrupulous of promoters proud.”

Representatives from Triller have did not immediately respond to an inquiry as this goes to publish, though any response from the company will be reported accordingly. The IBF staff collectively declined comment, as the matter remains under review.

Lopez (16-0, 12KOs) and Kambosos (19-0, 10KOs) were originally due to fight June 5 at loanDepot Park in Miami, Florida, per the terms of a February 25 purse bid hearing. Triller Fight Club won the rights to the championship fight after submitting a massive bid of $6,018,000, far outpacing Eddie Hearn’s Matchroom Boxing and Bob Arum’s Top Rank, the latter who promotes Lopez.

The original terms of the purse bid called for the fight to take place within 90 days. The Pay-Per-View event was confirmed for June 5 during fight week for Triller’s previous outing this past April, ahead of Jake Paul’s first-round knockout of Ben Askren on April 17. Lopez-Kambosos was to have been paired up with an exhibition bout between Hall of Fame former two-division champion Evander Holyfield and Kevin McBride.

Given the scenario, Lopez and his side were fine with the fight taking place just outside of the specified deadline, given the career-high payday of $3,911,700 that he was due to earn.

Upon the canceled June date, the hope from Lopez was that the fight would be rescheduled for August 14, or September 11 at the latest. There is legal ground for Lopez to demand a contract for either of those dates, though it is also worth noting that a restructured contract with Top Rank was due to begin with a December 11 rematch with Vasiliy Lomachenko (15-2, 11KOs), whom he outpointed last October in Las Vegas to become unified champion.

An October date would all but kill such plans, with even September pushing it. August 14 is a crowded date for boxing, with stateside shows already airing on ESPN, DAZN and Showtime.

Regardless, Lopez’s side still awaits a contract of any kind confirming his next fight. The last contract received and signed—which was submitted as evidence in the complaint—was for the fight to take place June 5.

“I understand that Triller/Proxima has raised what is a complete red herring regarding my medical condition,” Lopez noted in a Certification letter. “I am fine and would be ready to engage in a bout with Kambosos on either August 14 (a date first announced by Triller) or September 11, a date for which Triller has been selling pay per view[s].

“The continued delays by Triller/Proxima are injuring my career… given that Kambosos is my mandatory I must engage in it prior to future bouts. Had Triller/Proxima promoted the bout on May 29, June 5, August 14 or September 11 I could have accepted a bout for December. l can still do so if Triller/Proxima is defaulted and one of the other bidders steps promptly to the plate to promote my bout.”

The call for a defaulted purse bid would leave Triller to still pay 10% of its winning purse amount, to be split 75/25 in favor of the defending champion. From there, the IBF would rule whether to award to the next highest bidder—which was Matchroom Boxing, followed by Top Rank—or vacate the purse bid altogether and call for a new round of negotiations.

Matchroom’s Eddie Hearn has yet to commit to or even comment on any lingering interest in securing the rights to the fight. Top Rank’s Bob Arum previously informed BS.com’s Keith Idec of a plan in place should his company inherit the fight.
H8Usernames
Featherweight
Posts: 1196
Joined: 21 Mar 2020, 21:02

Re: Teofimo Lopez vs. George Kambosos Jr. - September 11, 2021

Post by H8Usernames »

Be a man. Go to Australia and take your loss like one.
Evander
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13994
Joined: 07 May 2005, 16:49

Re: Teofimo Lopez vs. George Kambosos Jr. - September 11, 2021

Post by Evander »

Everyone is looking forward to seeing Teo.
A lot would love to see Teo Loma 2.
gregregegg
Lightweight
Posts: 9145
Joined: 29 Sep 2017, 04:08

Re: Teofimo Lopez vs. George Kambosos Jr. - September 11, 2021

Post by gregregegg »

At first i was enjoying the game and hoping the fight would take place in australia. But now i hear the plans for the Loma rematch december, get this mismatch done ASAP or just tell Kambosas to beat it. Loma rematch is 10x the fight of this shit.
Ruthless-RKO
Welterweight
Posts: 101073
Joined: 24 Apr 2016, 11:59

Re: Teofimo Lopez vs. George Kambosos Jr. - September 11, 2021

Post by Ruthless-RKO »

margaret thatcher
Featherweight
Posts: 39230
Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43

Re: Teofimo Lopez vs. George Kambosos Jr. - September 11, 2021

Post by margaret thatcher »

lopez should just vacate the ibf and rematch loma, he'd still have 2 belts
Ruthless-RKO
Welterweight
Posts: 101073
Joined: 24 Apr 2016, 11:59

Re: Teofimo Lopez vs. George Kambosos Jr. - September 11, 2021

Post by Ruthless-RKO »

margaret thatcher wrote: 09 Aug 2021, 04:10 lopez should just vacate the ibf and rematch loma, he'd still have 2 belts
The worse thing that happened to Lopez was Triller winning this bid.
gregregegg
Lightweight
Posts: 9145
Joined: 29 Sep 2017, 04:08

Re: Teofimo Lopez vs. George Kambosos Jr. - September 11, 2021

Post by gregregegg »

Once you have clearly beat the man at a weight class you shouldent cop poor mandatories. this was fine when it was just a keep busy. but if you have to cancel the loma rematch for it na. Tell IBF/Triller/Kambosos to Fuk off,, then fight loma.

Is that IBF belt going to do more for your legacy or bank balance than getting a second win over a p4p guy.... no way. and if he loses to loma big bucks in a trillogy.
Ruthless-RKO
Welterweight
Posts: 101073
Joined: 24 Apr 2016, 11:59

Re: Teofimo Lopez vs. George Kambosos Jr. - September 11, 2021

Post by Ruthless-RKO »

ironbeard
Super Featherweight
Posts: 17189
Joined: 15 Sep 2018, 20:00

Re: Teofimo Lopez vs. George Kambosos Jr. - September 11, 2021

Post by ironbeard »

Isn’t that precious?

This cannot be good for either boxer. Kambosos Jr has every right to be upset. Once it was postponed for the first time I suspected that it might never happen. I am still not convinced that it ever will come off.
KiwiRider
Super Lightweight
Posts: 26493
Joined: 11 Feb 2017, 22:25

Re: Teofimo Lopez vs. George Kambosos Jr. - September 11, 2021

Post by KiwiRider »

Just letting Loma marinate until he slows down :roll:
margaret thatcher
Featherweight
Posts: 39230
Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43

Re: Teofimo Lopez vs. George Kambosos Jr. - September 11, 2021

Post by margaret thatcher »

is triller just trolling lopez and kambo here or something

ffs teo drop the ibf!
H8Usernames
Featherweight
Posts: 1196
Joined: 21 Mar 2020, 21:02

Re: Teofimo Lopez vs. George Kambosos Jr. - September 11, 2021

Post by H8Usernames »

It's ridiculous to claik that Triller can't delay the show for a month or two. This is a fight made through a pursebid process and hell fights are often delayed for 6 months or more. Then taking into account that Teofimo originally delayed the fight.... what is the b1tch crying about?
squiggy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2094
Joined: 04 Feb 2008, 03:35

Re: Teofimo Lopez vs. George Kambosos Jr. - September 11, 2021

Post by squiggy »

These two are just not going to fight. That's what I take in the poll.
candyslim
Welterweight
Posts: 5464
Joined: 06 Jun 2016, 06:13

Re: Teofimo Lopez vs. George Kambosos Jr. - September 11, 2021

Post by candyslim »

I'm now totally bored by it and have moved on. If it ever happens, great but I'm done worrying about it.
Onetimeonly
Super Featherweight
Posts: 11584
Joined: 16 Oct 2018, 06:28

Re: Teofimo Lopez vs. George Kambosos Jr. - September 11, 2021

Post by Onetimeonly »

KiwiRider wrote: 15 Aug 2021, 17:25 Just letting Loma marinate until he slows down :roll:
Loma don't want none
ironbeard
Super Featherweight
Posts: 17189
Joined: 15 Sep 2018, 20:00

Re: Teofimo Lopez vs. George Kambosos Jr. - September 11, 2021

Post by ironbeard »

Onetimeonly wrote: 19 Aug 2021, 08:04
KiwiRider wrote: 15 Aug 2021, 17:25 Just letting Loma marinate until he slows down :roll:
Loma don't want none
I agree.

Lomassiah wanted none of Teo for the first 6 innings of the first fight because if he DID engage he knew that Lopez might knock his head clean out of the park.
Ruthless-RKO
Welterweight
Posts: 101073
Joined: 24 Apr 2016, 11:59

Re: Teofimo Lopez vs. George Kambosos Jr. - September 11, 2021

Post by Ruthless-RKO »

Ruthless-RKO
Welterweight
Posts: 101073
Joined: 24 Apr 2016, 11:59

Re: Teofimo Lopez vs. George Kambosos Jr. - October 5, 2021

Post by Ruthless-RKO »

About time

Hulu only holds 5k or so..

And PPV price I guess ain’t the worst considering they were looking at $59 when first announced.
KiwiRider
Super Lightweight
Posts: 26493
Joined: 11 Feb 2017, 22:25

Re: Teofimo Lopez vs. George Kambosos Jr. - October 5, 2021

Post by KiwiRider »

Stuffed if I'm gonna pay for this.
It ain't PPV, simple.
I might be a Furious George fan, but I'm not a mug.
Ruthless-RKO
Welterweight
Posts: 101073
Joined: 24 Apr 2016, 11:59

Re: Teofimo Lopez vs. George Kambosos Jr. - October 5, 2021

Post by Ruthless-RKO »

KiwiRider wrote: 23 Aug 2021, 15:54 Stuffed if I'm gonna pay for this.
It ain't PPV, simple.
I might be a Furious George fan, but I'm not a mug.
And it’s a Tuesday..
Ruthless-RKO
Welterweight
Posts: 101073
Joined: 24 Apr 2016, 11:59

Re: Teofimo Lopez vs. George Kambosos Jr. - October 5, 2021

Post by Ruthless-RKO »

Triller sends contracts to Teofimo Lopez, George Kambosos for Oct. 5 title fight at MSG

The Teofimo Lopez-George Kambosos soap opera appears to be reaching its conclusion.

Triller's Ryan Kavanaugh told ESPN he sent contracts on Monday to both Lopez and Kambosos for the undisputed lightweight title fight to take place Oct. 5 at New York's Hulu Theater at MSG.

"We're really excited about it: Tuesday night boxing in New York," Kavanaugh said. He added that the pay-per-view will be available for $19.99 via FITE or for $2.99 as part of a monthly Triller subscription.

The IBF's deadline for Triller to submit contracts and maintain its rights to the fight is Tuesday. That deadline was part of an IBF ruling that scrapped Triller's plan to hold the fight Oct. 17 in Sydney. The New Jersey-based organization mandated the fight can't be staged in a country that requires quarantine. Australia currently enforces a 14-day quarantine period.

The struggle to finalize a date and site for the undisputed lightweight title fight led to a legal dispute between Lopez's manager, David McWater, and Kavanaugh. After the IBF ruling, Kavanaugh made efforts to hold the fight in the Middle East. Ultimately, he decided on New York, where Triller has a monthly Tuesday night boxing series. It debuted earlier this month with heavyweight contender Michael Hunter and a Verzuz rap battle between The Lox and Dipset.

Lopez-Kambosos will represent the rare high-profile boxing match that doesn't take place on a Saturday. The fight for all four 135-pound belts will land just four days before Tyson Fury and Deontay Wilder conclude their trilogy for the heavyweight title on Oct. 9 in Las Vegas.

And it will be at a location Lopez is all too familiar with. ESPN's No. 6 pound-for-pound boxer has competed at MSG (theater or the big room) six times, most notably a second-round KO of Richard Commey in December 2019. That was Lopez's first title fight.

The 24-year-old from Brooklyn, New York, added three more titles in his next outing, an October decision win over Vasiliy Lomachenko. Lopez (16-0, 12 KOs) was set to defend his championship against Kambosos (19-0, 10 KOs) on June 19 in Miami but tested positive for COVID days before.

The repeated delays to hold Lopez-Kambosos ended Top Rank's hope of pairing Teofimo and Loma in a December rematch. Lomachenko remains in talks for a Dec. 11 fight against Commey in New York. Lopez will earn $3.912 million, a career-high payday. He made $1.35 for the Lomachenko fight.

Kambosos, a 28-year-old Australian, became the mandatory challenge with a decision win over Lee Selby in October. He's set to earn $2.106 million, also a career best.
H8Usernames
Featherweight
Posts: 1196
Joined: 21 Mar 2020, 21:02

Re: Teofimo Lopez vs. George Kambosos Jr. - October 5, 2021

Post by H8Usernames »

Look forward to seeing Kambosos stop the Teo hypetrain for good.
Post Reply