Re: Zhilei Zhang vs. Joe Joyce II | TNT Sport - 23 September 2023
Posted: 17 Sep 2023, 05:16
Joyce should never have fought Zhang in the first place and just said he could beat him. Seems to work for Fury and his fans.
I’m not questioning the validity of Zhangs win, he largely outboxed Joyce for the 6 rounds it lasted. He won, the referee did what he felt was right, he stopped the fight because he felt the injury was too severe for the fight to continue. It was fair. The damage was caused by punches.Frostieballs wrote: ↑17 Sep 2023, 04:19That’s where we differ.Kilburn wrote: ↑16 Sep 2023, 19:04And I’m not saying the ref was wrong to do it either. The eye looked horrible. It was a fair result.Frostieballs wrote: ↑16 Sep 2023, 17:56
Wow. This is so different to how I saw it. The referee was definitely right to pull him out in my opinion
But losing on an eye injury (which is why the ref stopped the fight) is not the same as getting knocked out or wilting to the point where you can fight no longer.
I think it is the same as getting knocked out / stopped ….. on the basis that the damage occurred as a result of being soundly outboxed and taking sustained punishment.
Either way you have rendered your opponent unable to continue by outperforming them.
When it is that one sided the damage is coming out somewhere.
That's a fair point, but he's not the most emotive fighter even in victory. For me it was good to see someone not whining after.joshj909 wrote: ↑17 Sep 2023, 04:41Joyce did not complain at all. Didn't even look disappointed when the doctor called it.Frostieballs wrote: ↑17 Sep 2023, 04:19That’s where we differ.
I think it is the same as getting knocked out / stopped ….. on the basis that the damage occurred as a result of being soundly outboxed and taking sustained punishment.
Either way you have rendered your opponent unable to continue by outperforming them.
When it is that one sided the damage is coming out somewhere.
As I said mate, that’s where we differ. The validity of it is exactly the same to me.Kilburn wrote: ↑17 Sep 2023, 06:57I’m not questioning the validity of Zhangs win, he largely outboxed Joyce for the 6 rounds it lasted. He won, the referee did what he felt was right, he stopped the fight because he felt the injury was too severe for the fight to continue. It was fair. The damage was caused by punches.Frostieballs wrote: ↑17 Sep 2023, 04:19That’s where we differ.
I think it is the same as getting knocked out / stopped ….. on the basis that the damage occurred as a result of being soundly outboxed and taking sustained punishment.
Either way you have rendered your opponent unable to continue by outperforming them.
When it is that one sided the damage is coming out somewhere.
But when weighing up the rematch, it’s not insignificant to highlight that the fight was scheduled for 12 rounds not 6. And it’s not a stretch to say that Joyce could have continued. Zhang was doing a lot less by the end, Joe wasn’t staggering all over the ring from being hurt, he didn’t appear exhausted / at the end of his tether, and he could still see out of the eye.
Joyce is up against it next Saturday for obvious reasons. But to say the manor of his defeat last time is the same as getting knocked out, simply isn’t true.
Bad idea for the same tactics and crossing your fingers that your face holds upFrostieballs wrote: ↑17 Sep 2023, 14:08As I said mate, that’s where we differ. The validity of it is exactly the same to me.Kilburn wrote: ↑17 Sep 2023, 06:57I’m not questioning the validity of Zhangs win, he largely outboxed Joyce for the 6 rounds it lasted. He won, the referee did what he felt was right, he stopped the fight because he felt the injury was too severe for the fight to continue. It was fair. The damage was caused by punches.Frostieballs wrote: ↑17 Sep 2023, 04:19
That’s where we differ.
I think it is the same as getting knocked out / stopped ….. on the basis that the damage occurred as a result of being soundly outboxed and taking sustained punishment.
Either way you have rendered your opponent unable to continue by outperforming them.
When it is that one sided the damage is coming out somewhere.
But when weighing up the rematch, it’s not insignificant to highlight that the fight was scheduled for 12 rounds not 6. And it’s not a stretch to say that Joyce could have continued. Zhang was doing a lot less by the end, Joe wasn’t staggering all over the ring from being hurt, he didn’t appear exhausted / at the end of his tether, and he could still see out of the eye.
Joyce is up against it next Saturday for obvious reasons. But to say the manor of his defeat last time is the same as getting knocked out, simply isn’t true.
You could argue that had the eye not gone, he could have turned the fight around as Zhang was tiring.
Had he been knocked out with a Hail Mary shot you could similarly argue that had he not been caught - or if his chin was better - he could have turned the fight around.
I think we both agree, however, that he will have to change something!
there are weaknesses around the face, lots of scar tissue. I always worry those scars will open up as they're against near-bone. Either way we'll all be watching this fight and I don't think any of us know with any great confidence who the victor who will be.Coco wrote: ↑17 Sep 2023, 14:17Bad idea for the same tactics and crossing your fingers that your face holds upFrostieballs wrote: ↑17 Sep 2023, 14:08As I said mate, that’s where we differ. The validity of it is exactly the same to me.Kilburn wrote: ↑17 Sep 2023, 06:57
I’m not questioning the validity of Zhangs win, he largely outboxed Joyce for the 6 rounds it lasted. He won, the referee did what he felt was right, he stopped the fight because he felt the injury was too severe for the fight to continue. It was fair. The damage was caused by punches.
But when weighing up the rematch, it’s not insignificant to highlight that the fight was scheduled for 12 rounds not 6. And it’s not a stretch to say that Joyce could have continued. Zhang was doing a lot less by the end, Joe wasn’t staggering all over the ring from being hurt, he didn’t appear exhausted / at the end of his tether, and he could still see out of the eye.
Joyce is up against it next Saturday for obvious reasons. But to say the manor of his defeat last time is the same as getting knocked out, simply isn’t true.
You could argue that had the eye not gone, he could have turned the fight around as Zhang was tiring.
Had he been knocked out with a Hail Mary shot you could similarly argue that had he not been caught - or if his chin was better - he could have turned the fight around.
I think we both agree, however, that he will have to change something!
Yeah.margaret thatcher wrote: ↑16 Sep 2023, 17:38 never went down, but maybe that, and his badly damaged eye, shouldve given him a bit of respect for the power![]()
Really? I hadn't noticed.
fighting TBA, one of the most active fighters on the circuit https://boxrec.com/en/box-pro/716443
I read that he’d pulled out to fight Whittaker. Perhaps that was incorrect.
No chance McIntyre pulls it off?Manchester Hitman wrote: ↑18 Sep 2023, 15:31I like the look of Taylor - this is a decent step up opponent, so I look forward to seeing what kind of job he can do on him.
if i recall the forum was generally pretty excited about the fight, though a few thought it was easy for joyce
Yes I recall being surprised at the general reaction on here. I was definitely in the minority in not recognising the potential threat that Zhang was.margaret thatcher wrote: ↑18 Sep 2023, 15:52if i recall the forum was generally pretty excited about the fight, though a few thought it was easy for joyce