BoxRec

cutsman wrote:
Best to take sky's 18/1 on bellew rds 1-6

Interesting. Might be worth a punt. Stranger theyngs have happened.

The Insider wrote:

cutsman wrote:
Best to take sky's 18/1 on bellew rds 1-6

Interesting. Might be worth a punt. Stranger theyngs have happened.

Hmmm. It's a big price but in my view Bellew just hasn't shown anything to suggest he can hang with Stevenson. I see him as being on Don George's level - we'll see if he can take as much punishment. My guess is he can't.

Silakh to win

Bellew to win

Sturm to win

Treble pays 93/1 with sky bet.

The chances of it coming in.......?

Very slim but it's only a fiver so hey ho.

I think Sillakh is huge at 8/1 with Sky Bet to beat Kovalev. Granted, Kovalev may well starch him early but Sillakh is a world class talent and if he survives the early onslaught I could see him outboxing Kovalev.

SteveDow wrote:I think Sillakh is huge at 8/1 with Sky Bet to beat Kovalev. Granted, Kovalev may well starch him early but Sillakh is a world class talent and if he survives the early onslaught I could see him outboxing Kovalev.

Big if. I can see Sillakh folding very early under the bulldozer-like pressure exerted by Kovalev. Early on I thought Sillakh was a really exciting prospect but then he got beat by Grachev who was subsequently starched by the sub-standard Edwin Rodriguez. Hmmm.

I feel like Kovalev is like Golovkin in that either is to be beaten, the opponent will have to be very tough and slick. A technical boxer with a dig, or if they don't have a dig they need to have a good engine with a great defence and some moves (IE, Ward).

I feel like Stevenson doesn't fit the profile to beat Kovalev as I don't see him staying out of trouble for the whole fight. It's obviously possible his power could cause Sergey problems, but at this stage I don't trust Stevenson's ability to pull through a war, whereas Kovalev looks pretty damn sturdy.

Guys I have a question. I put a 5 fold accumulator on but accidentally hit number of lines = 5 and it multiplied my intended stake by 5. What does this mean for my accumulator? and how is it different from a standard accumulator???

Thanks

Riddick Blowe wrote:Guys I have a question. I put a 5 fold accumulator on but accidentally hit number of lines = 5 and it multiplied my intended stake by 5. What does this mean for my accumulator? and how is it different from a standard accumulator???

Thanks

Have you now bet each selection as a single win now too as well.as the Accumulator.

The Insider wrote:

Riddick Blowe wrote:Guys I have a question. I put a 5 fold accumulator on but accidentally hit number of lines = 5 and it multiplied my intended stake by 5. What does this mean for my accumulator? and how is it different from a standard accumulator???

Thanks

Have you now bet each selection as a single win now too as well.as the Accumulator.

Dunno, is it that? That I have put 5 singles on and the accumulator in addition? Would that make sense because why would it give added value on five singles.. looks like this

£0.00
Date Receipt Bet Type Number Of Lines Total Stake Paid
0000057 Accumulator (5) (To win) 5 £115.00

Anyone?
So after a huge weekend last week I am on for another monstrous accumulator.

Leicester Rugby WIN
Glasgow Rugby WIN
Stevenson stoppage 1-6
Sturm/Barker to go distance
Chisora stoppage

Kovalev, Stevenson and Chisora fights under 11 rounds is almost 2/1

You can get 20-1 Sillakh points at Skybet

Been a while since I've had a punt but I've gone in quite large on Stevenson in rounds 1-6 @ 13/8

Not really bothered this weekend, just had a few tiny outrageous bets to keep me interested.

Riddick Blowe wrote:

SteveDow wrote:I think Sillakh is huge at 8/1 with Sky Bet to beat Kovalev. Granted, Kovalev may well starch him early but Sillakh is a world class talent and if he survives the early onslaught I could see him outboxing Kovalev.

Big if. I can see Sillakh folding very early under the bulldozer-like pressure exerted by Kovalev. Early on I thought Sillakh was a really exciting prospect but then he got beat by Grachev who was subsequently starched by the sub-standard Edwin Rodriguez. Hmmm.

I feel like Kovalev is like Golovkin in that either is to be beaten, the opponent will have to be very tough and slick. A technical boxer with a dig, or if they don't have a dig they need to have a good engine with a great defence and some moves (IE, Ward).

I feel like Stevenson doesn't fit the profile to beat Kovalev as I don't see him staying out of trouble for the whole fight. It's obviously possible his power could cause Sergey problems, but at this stage I don't trust Stevenson's ability to pull through a war, whereas Kovalev looks pretty damn sturdy.

Based on what exactly? He's never been in with anyone with a real dig at world level.

Hagler2002 wrote:Been a while since I've had a punt but I've gone in quite large on Stevenson in rounds 1-6 @ 13/8

Was looking at that or AS rounds 1-4 @11/4.

Still undecided.

ShadrachSimmo wrote:

Hagler2002 wrote:Been a while since I've had a punt but I've gone in quite large on Stevenson in rounds 1-6 @ 13/8

Was looking at that or AS rounds 1-4 @11/4.

Still undecided.

What are the odds on a late stoppage for Stevenson? Say between 9-12? I struggle to see Bellew getting blown out really early.

Any chance Bellew toughs it out into the later rounds? I've got Adonis 1-6 but I'm a bit worried

I've got £17 on a bellew win at 4/1 and £3 on the draw at 25/1

My top tips for tonight:

Skeete Points and Chisora Stoppage. Double pays just over 6/5

Happy betting folks!

Derek Chisora to stop Ondrej Pala between rounds 5 and 8
Adonis Stevenson to stop Tony Bellew within 12 rounds (Sorry Tony)
Bradley Skeete to beat Colin Lynes outright
and
Sergey Kovalev to stop Ismayl Sillakh within 6 rounds

i've bet the Lucky 15 accumulator. But the odds on the 4 fold are 11.68/1

Sticking a bit of loose change on Sillakh on points at 16/1 for a bit of interest. He's a talented guy but has chin issues so wouldn't be surprised to see him get stopped early but if he can fight a cautious fights he has the skills to outbox Kovalev.

That's all for me this weekend.

Riddick Blowe wrote:Anyone?
So after a huge weekend last week I am on for another monstrous accumulator.

Leicester Rugby WIN
Glasgow Rugby WIN
Stevenson stoppage 1-6
Sturm/Barker to go distance
Chisora stoppage

Holy mother, I just need Barker/Sturm to go the distance now and it's another champagne accumulator for me.

Riddick Blowe wrote:

Riddick Blowe wrote:Anyone?
So after a huge weekend last week I am on for another monstrous accumulator.

Leicester Rugby WIN
Glasgow Rugby WIN
Stevenson stoppage 1-6
Sturm/Barker to go distance
Chisora stoppage

Holy mother, I just need Barker/Sturm to go the distance now and it's another champagne accumulator for me.

What's the odds on that lot m8?

I was wondering what people thought about next weekend as there is some money to be made. Malignaggi and Judah has me unsure who would you back for that?

Hagler2002 wrote:

Riddick Blowe wrote:

Riddick Blowe wrote:Anyone?
So after a huge weekend last week I am on for another monstrous accumulator.

Leicester Rugby WIN
Glasgow Rugby WIN
Stevenson stoppage 1-6
Sturm/Barker to go distance
Chisora stoppage

Holy mother, I just need Barker/Sturm to go the distance now and it's another champagne accumulator for me.

What's the odds on that lot m8?

Think it was 12/1 mate. Funny thing, I accidentally put 5 times the stake on it I meant to because I somehow ended up with 5 lines in the accumulator. Hagler, do you know what this '5 lines' business means for my accumulator as opposed to an accumulator of five with one line? I can't seem to find out anywhere.

Bet Placed At 29/11/2013

Bet Type Accumulator (4)

Stake Per Line £23.00

Number Of Lines 5

Total Stake Paid £115.00