Page 95 of 180
Re: Boxrec Ratings - Read first before commenting on the ratings
Posted: 14 Apr 2016, 19:46
by ImranSarwar
How is it, "points" a.t. I'm given various reviews at different times??????? And, is their a permanent record of "changes"? John Wilkinson 1855 have seen '1' point, '2 points', '3 points' at various times off of the fifth line. Listed for Supermiddleweight [I'm true -w- boxer..but, yes, boxed the hvy]
I'll like to say two more things here. Other than, I >DO NOT< understand in least HOW the ratings are compiled. I "compliment" the institution of BoxRec* for the sheer VASTNESS of their work [hire the About.com boxing man!][buy up DD chains and McDonald's restaurants but..lets.."conference!".......][<<< "dreams!"
: )] -BUT- "seem the human touch missing". I will site TWO "samples", that do NOT make sense. [I've projected these two often already!] aa. How is it BILLY BACKUS rated a.t. 50 slots above MARLON STARLING? That is a "JOKE". bb. FLOYD PATTERSON RATED SO HIGHLY a.t. @HVY.wt. HOW?
Floyd Patterson ERA was UNIQUE. But....he may of been able to win vs Marciano. "Maybe"! BUT, that is hypothetical reasoning OF COURSE!
Floyd Patterson rated above GEORGE FOREMAN? That is IMPOSSIBLE!
O.K., last: I like to use ERNIE SHAVERS, RON LYLE, KEN NORTON against each other a.t. 1-2-3 per a rating. Some gents like to PLAY THAT HERE? Their is only one RIGHT ANSWER. [That's why I LIKE this group. Nice test to Seperate the Real Estate agents from the true boxing people]
Re: Boxrec Ratings - Read first before commenting on the ratings
Posted: 15 Apr 2016, 04:07
by mike1989
Who don't be write me please how are the new ratings ???? please ) ???????????????
Re: Boxrec Ratings - Read first before commenting on the ratings
Posted: 15 Apr 2016, 11:02
by John
mike1989 wrote:Who don't be write me please how are the new ratings ???? please ) ???????????????
I'm sure Martin will update the wiki page soon
Re: Boxrec Ratings - Read first before commenting on the ratings
Posted: 15 Apr 2016, 15:46
by computerrank
John wrote:mike1989 wrote:Who don't be write me please how are the new ratings ???? please ) ???????????????
I'm sure Martin will update the wiki page soon
done ...
Re: Boxrec Ratings - Read first before commenting on the ratings
Posted: 15 Apr 2016, 16:43
by mike1989
guys I don't razgovarivaju is in English for some example for example Pacquiao, or why almost anyone with time is 20-50 years, not cut the rating can not be said about boxers new guard. Do before the grass was greener and the sun shone brighter ??? )
Re: Boxrec Ratings - Read first before commenting on the ratings
Posted: 15 Apr 2016, 17:57
by JCS
mike1989 wrote:guys I don't razgovarivaju is in English for some example for example Pacquiao, or why almost anyone with time is 20-50 years, not cut the rating can not be said about boxers new guard. Do before the grass was greener and the sun shone brighter ??? )
What the hell?
Re: Boxrec Ratings - Read first before commenting on the ratings
Posted: 15 Apr 2016, 18:22
by John
razgovaraju is Croation for speak
Re: Boxrec Ratings - Read first before commenting on the ratings
Posted: 16 Apr 2016, 02:15
by Manrae
computerrank wrote:John wrote:mike1989 wrote:Who don't be write me please how are the new ratings ???? please ) ???????????????
I'm sure Martin will update the wiki page soon
done ...
Hello, I was just wondering if the ratings change affects this page or not
http://boxrec.com/media/index.php/BoxRe ... al_Ratings
Re: Boxrec Ratings - Read first before commenting on the ratings
Posted: 16 Apr 2016, 04:10
by pugilisticspecialist
computerrank wrote:... additionally ... by the ratings program
- inactive boxers are assigned to the division with best 3 performances within their career
Then why is Juan Manuel Marquez listed as a welterweight?
Re: Boxrec Ratings - Read first before commenting on the ratings
Posted: 16 Apr 2016, 05:02
by computerrank
pugilisticspecialist wrote:computerrank wrote:... additionally ... by the ratings program
- inactive boxers are assigned to the division with best 3 performances within their career
Then why is Juan Manuel Marquez listed as a welterweight?
Juan Manuel Marquez is inactive, but in detail the ratings waits to change it until 2 year after his last bout.
Might be inactive boxers want to be stay active actually and thry want to be rated at their last weight division.
Re: Boxrec Ratings - Read first before commenting on the ratings
Posted: 16 Apr 2016, 05:05
by computerrank
I think so ... I will make a try.
Re: Boxrec Ratings - Read first before commenting on the ratings
Posted: 16 Apr 2016, 17:05
by computerrank
... first step done ... looks different ... has to be detailed ...
Re: Boxrec Ratings - Read first before commenting on the ratings
Posted: 17 Apr 2016, 01:22
by Manrae
computerrank wrote:
... first step done ... looks different ... has to be detailed ...
Oh wow, that was fast
Great work btw
Re: Boxrec Ratings - Read first before commenting on the ratings
Posted: 17 Apr 2016, 03:27
by mike1989
Explain please for example how Pacquiao in the ranking of all-time has moved from the second ten positions on the fifth ????
Re: Boxrec Ratings - Read first before commenting on the ratings
Posted: 17 Apr 2016, 08:59
by computerrank
mike1989 wrote:Explain please for example how Pacquiao in the ranking of all-time has moved from the second ten positions on the fifth ????
I looked into it - this is a bug in the new program release v27.
I fixed it and a corrected release v27a will be launched.
... is in place now ...
Re: Boxrec Ratings - Read first before commenting on the ratings
Posted: 18 Apr 2016, 06:07
by mike1989
why Holyfield is so a lot added in rank, I see that the age of 80 and on our time only to lose in the ratings ????? Holyfield had 6 top-ranking and largest value of the maximum rating he did not have ????
Re: Boxrec Ratings - Read first before commenting on the ratings
Posted: 18 Apr 2016, 09:23
by mike1989
Write please the example now this is a rating of all-time look ratings has changed the rating komuto komuto diminish added ????
Re: Boxrec Ratings - Read first before commenting on the ratings
Posted: 18 Apr 2016, 11:20
by computerrank
mike1989 wrote:Write please the example now this is a rating of all-time look ratings has changed the rating komuto komuto diminish added ????
Holyfield's all time rating development
the numbers:
- year
- anual rating
- ranking points accumulated
- opponent rank points accumulated
- points for career top rating
Code: Select all
Cruiserweight 1985 240 42 9 0 34 499 Evander Holyfield
Cruiserweight 1986 672 235 75 66 94 499 Evander Holyfield
Cruiserweight 1987 1068 373 141 82 149 499 Evander Holyfield
Cruiserweight 1988 1073 461 207 104 150 499 Evander Holyfield
Heavyweight 1989 792 499 240 109 150 499 Evander Holyfield
Heavyweight 1990 1079 632 306 175 151 499 Evander Holyfield
Heavyweight 1991 1089 709 372 185 152 499 Evander Holyfield
Heavyweight 1992 562 749 405 192 152 499 Evander Holyfield
Heavyweight 1993 706 881 471 258 152 499 Evander Holyfield
Heavyweight 1994 509 913 493 267 152 499 Evander Holyfield
Heavyweight 1995 310 921 501 267 152 499 Evander Holyfield
Heavyweight 1996 518 1020 534 333 152 499 Evander Holyfield
Heavyweight 1997 587 1066 567 347 152 499 Evander Holyfield
Heavyweight 1998 516 1099 600 347 152 499 Evander Holyfield
Heavyweight 1999 411 1198 633 413 152 499 Evander Holyfield
Heavyweight 2000 386 1224 655 416 152 499 Evander Holyfield
Heavyweight 2001 298 1243 662 429 152 499 Evander Holyfield
Heavyweight 2002 258 1268 670 446 152 499 Evander Holyfield
Re: Boxrec Ratings - Read first before commenting on the ratings
Posted: 19 Apr 2016, 03:20
by mike1989
please write the rating Wladimir Klitschko and Holyfield ??
Re: Boxrec Ratings - Read first before commenting on the ratings
Posted: 23 Apr 2016, 12:37
by computerrank
Code: Select all
Heavyweight 1999 176 32 8 0 25 7035 Wladimir Klitschko
Heavyweight 2000 405 111 41 13 57 7035 Wladimir Klitschko
Heavyweight 2001 431 147 74 13 60 7035 Wladimir Klitschko
Heavyweight 2002 467 194 107 21 65 7035 Wladimir Klitschko
Heavyweight 2003 303 202 115 21 65 7035 Wladimir Klitschko
Heavyweight 2005 313 230 130 35 65 7035 Wladimir Klitschko
Heavyweight 2006 543 373 196 101 76 7035 Wladimir Klitschko
Heavyweight 2007 612 453 262 101 90 7035 Wladimir Klitschko
Heavyweight 2008 720 540 328 112 101 7035 Wladimir Klitschko
Heavyweight 2009 872 694 394 178 122 7035 Wladimir Klitschko
Heavyweight 2010 793 779 460 186 133 7035 Wladimir Klitschko
Heavyweight 2011 855 878 526 219 133 7035 Wladimir Klitschko
Heavyweight 2012 690 911 559 219 133 7035 Wladimir Klitschko
Heavyweight 2013 720 1010 625 252 133 7035 Wladimir Klitschko
Heavyweight 2014 807 1142 691 318 133 7035 Wladimir Klitschko
Heavyweight 2015 590 1175 724 318 133 7035 Wladimir Klitschko
Re: Boxrec Ratings - Read first before commenting on the ratings
Posted: 23 Apr 2016, 15:21
by mike1989
thank you. I thought You forgot my question )...
Re: Boxrec Ratings - Read first before commenting on the ratings
Posted: 23 Apr 2016, 15:46
by mike1989
I have a question for rating of Klitschko- opponent rank points accumulated :
2007 Lamon Brewster isn't the Klitschko prenez rating points ???
2012 Tony Thompson isn't the Klitschko prenez rating points ???
2015 Bryant Jennings isn't the Klitschko prenez rating points ???
2004 not at all prenes rating Klitschko (2010 points at the end of the year)???? there was victory on Devarim Williamson (219 points at the time of the battle) ???
Re: Boxrec Ratings - Read first before commenting on the ratings
Posted: 23 Apr 2016, 15:50
by mike1989
and as Holyfield rank in opponent points accumulated 1999 added 66 points if he had a draw and a defeat from Lewis ????
Re: Boxrec Ratings - Read first before commenting on the ratings
Posted: 23 Apr 2016, 17:02
by computerrank
mike1989 wrote:I have a question for rating of Klitschko- opponent rank points accumulated :
2007 Lamon Brewster isn't the Klitschko prenez rating points ???
2012 Tony Thompson isn't the Klitschko prenez rating points ???
2015 Bryant Jennings isn't the Klitschko prenez rating points ???
2004 not at all prenes rating Klitschko (2010 points at the end of the year)???? there was victory on Devarim Williamson (219 points at the time of the battle) ???
The tables only list boxers with their years, when they were in the top 10 of their annual best performance division.
But ... I guess, I should have a look into it - looks strange ...
Re: Boxrec Ratings - Read first before commenting on the ratings
Posted: 24 Apr 2016, 02:37
by mike1989
thank you. opponent rank points accumulated by the top 10? top 15? top 30 ??? to the attention of the rating of which is taken at the time of the match or at the end of the year ???