Re: Who is the hardest man to ever step in a ring?
Posted: 10 May 2009, 14:17
G0mez wrote:Emile Griffith - depending on the opponent, he was extremely hard when entering the ring.
G0mez wrote:Emile Griffith - depending on the opponent, he was extremely hard when entering the ring.
Yeah, classic. Pure comedy genius.FLINT ISLAND wrote:G0mez wrote:Emile Griffith - depending on the opponent, he was extremely hard when entering the ring.![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
All very credible, but some one who sings into the ring facing the two biggest punching heavyweights of the modern area, when widely considered past it, gets mine.dr_devious wrote:Marvin Hagler was the hardest man of the recent era imo. He had a 15 year career, with 10-12 years at the top level and only ever took a count once, which was a disputed knockdown against Juan Roldan. He faced the most murderous punchers of the 70s and 80s like Cyclone Hart, Bennie Briscoe, Tommy Hearns and John Mugabi. Marvin proved himself to be indestructable, so he gets my vote.
The trainer of Joe Louis?bennie wrote:Jack Blackburn is the first name that springs to my mind.
I'm not arguing with the above evidence but surely bursting into tears tarnishes the hard man image a little.zzutak wrote:Oliver McCall
All other names mentioned above (though I can't verify for Joe Grim) were stopped or dropped at least once during their career, no one has come close to doing either to McCall (apart from second Lewis fight when he simply gave up) even in this 'fight' no defense at all in last round allowing free shots and he still didn't go down!
Carbo wrote:Yeah, classic. Pure comedy genius.FLINT ISLAND wrote:G0mez wrote:Emile Griffith - depending on the opponent, he was extremely hard when entering the ring.![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Kunt.
Yes, absolutely hilarious to mock a true warrior of the ring because of his sexuality with the kind of joke a seven year old would view as base and childish.E wrote:Oh I just got this....Come on carbo it's not that out of order. I think it's fairly funny I'm afraid....
I think his image was more 'crazy coke head' then hard man as such.zzutak wrote:Good point, though did Oliver ever have a 'hard man image?Matchfixer wrote:
I'm not arguing with the above evidence but surely bursting into tears tarnishes the hard man image a little.
Look, I respect Emile Griffith an AWFUL lot for coming out in a macho sport - it is virtually unknown for any pro sportsman to come out, let alone in boxing.Carbo wrote:Yes, absolutely hilarious to mock a true warrior of the ring because of his sexuality with the kind of joke a seven year old would view as base and childish.E wrote:Oh I just got this....Come on carbo it's not that out of order. I think it's fairly funny I'm afraid....
Why don't you go the whole hog and start mocking blacks, hispanics and jews, too?
Come on. Grow up, eh?
well saidE wrote:Look, I respect Emile Griffith an AWFUL lot for coming out in a macho sport - it is virtually unknown for any pro sportsman to come out, let alone in boxing.Carbo wrote:Yes, absolutely hilarious to mock a true warrior of the ring because of his sexuality with the kind of joke a seven year old would view as base and childish.E wrote:Oh I just got this....Come on carbo it's not that out of order. I think it's fairly funny I'm afraid....
Why don't you go the whole hog and start mocking blacks, hispanics and jews, too?
Come on. Grow up, eh?
But all I'm saying is that the joke, whilst being childish, is fairly tongue in cheek, and is not spiteful. There is no need for your over-the-top holier than though thought-fascism.
The gays I know would chuckle, they would just find it a bit silly.
I love the way people such as yourself get 'offended' at everything on behalf of other groups who probably wouldn't give a sh1t anyway.
Good facts Benniebennie wrote:You know, Emile Griffith contested 339 world title rounds in his career which puts him above the likes of Sugar Ray Robinson (288), Muhammad Ali (270) and Larry Holmes (254).
His last fight was against our own Alan Minter.
FLINT ISLAND wrote:The one who was the most beast.
The one who could take punshiment and still be standing.
The one who was impossible to destroy.

Thanks. It might make him No. 1 but I cannot be bothered to check Sven Ottke or Bernard Hopkins.TerribleTerry wrote:Good facts Benniebennie wrote:You know, Emile Griffith contested 339 world title rounds in his career which puts him above the likes of Sugar Ray Robinson (288), Muhammad Ali (270) and Larry Holmes (254).
His last fight was against our own Alan Minter.
They both have less.bennie wrote:Thanks. It might make him No. 1 but I cannot be bothered to check Sven Ottke or Bernard Hopkins.TerribleTerry wrote:Good facts Benniebennie wrote:You know, Emile Griffith contested 339 world title rounds in his career which puts him above the likes of Sugar Ray Robinson (288), Muhammad Ali (270) and Larry Holmes (254).
His last fight was against our own Alan Minter.