Page 2 of 2

Re: prizefighter journeymen

Posted: 22 May 2009, 11:13
by Dioufy
I wouldn't watch it, not because I dislike journeymen, but because Prizefighter is crap without KD's or knockouts. The best Prizefighter's have been the big boys who can whack. Does anyone remember the lightweight Prizefighter? It was crap and boring.

Re: prizefighter journeymen

Posted: 22 May 2009, 11:45
by brian13
Dioufy wrote:I wouldn't watch it, not because I dislike journeymen, but because Prizefighter is crap without KD's or knockouts. The best Prizefighter's have been the big boys who can whack. Does anyone remember the lightweight Prizefighter? It was crap and boring.
The 2nd HW prizefighter was worse.

Re: prizefighter journeymen

Posted: 22 May 2009, 11:53
by alexpaterson
I think there should be 2 prospects 4 just under British level 2 last chance fighters-fighters who are old and this is there last chance of a title shot the prospects for excitiment the British level for expiernce and know how and the last chance fighters to give them a chance

Re: prizefighter journeymen

Posted: 22 May 2009, 13:55
by Dioufy
brian13 wrote:
Dioufy wrote:I wouldn't watch it, not because I dislike journeymen, but because Prizefighter is crap without KD's or knockouts. The best Prizefighter's have been the big boys who can whack. Does anyone remember the lightweight Prizefighter? It was crap and boring.
The 2nd HW prizefighter was worse.
Yeah, minus that one, the one's from light heavyweight have been good. 3/4 that have been belters isn't a bad ratio.

Re: prizefighter journeymen

Posted: 27 May 2009, 00:35
by Vendetta
:box: Prizefighter journeymen sounds a good idea, it would sell for that fact that its new and would have people talking about it.
alot of todays journeymen are better then one would think, sometimes they just need a chance to show.
Thumbs up to it. :bow: