Page 2 of 3
Re: Khan - Kotelnik off?????
Posted: 13 Jun 2009, 09:30
by Poncey
Can Bobby Gunn drain in time.
Re: Khan - Kotelnik off?????
Posted: 13 Jun 2009, 10:04
by The Law
Emerson Poncey Name Ghent wrote:Can Bobby Gunn drain in time.

Re: Khan - Kotelnik off?????
Posted: 13 Jun 2009, 10:50
by whicker
GazMan85 wrote:
I'm thinking a late replacement.
It's 2 weeks notice - who, realistically, would be available?
Re: Khan - Kotelnik off?????
Posted: 13 Jun 2009, 11:02
by dazzer
i was thinking the other day, sky have not really done alot of promotion for this fight, they always try to sell khan nearly 2 months before, his fight now 2 weeks before and i have still not seen an advert for the fight.
could it be it is a big arena, and not many tix sold, £40 to sit up in the gods ?
Re: Khan - Kotelnik off?????
Posted: 13 Jun 2009, 15:13
by m1kee50
ESPN mentions Lamont Peterson.... some thoughts.... too big a fight for a replacement, Peterson can punch a bit/
Re: Khan - Kotelnik off?????
Posted: 13 Jun 2009, 15:19
by Coco
So Khan will win a world title the vacant/interim route against a short notice sub
I bet my mortgage it will be a super feather
Re: Khan - Kotelnik off?????
Posted: 13 Jun 2009, 15:59
by hitman_hatton1
Emerson Poncey Name Ghent wrote:Lamont might beat him. I see him as the lesser of the two Peterson's.
Might be worth picking up a bargain ticket.
yeah anthony is better.
lamont is good though.
stupid matchmaking from warren if he goes for it.

Re: Khan - Kotelnik off?????
Posted: 13 Jun 2009, 16:04
by sweetscience
hitman_hatton1 wrote:Emerson Poncey Name Ghent wrote:Lamont might beat him. I see him as the lesser of the two Peterson's.
Might be worth picking up a bargain ticket.
yeah anthony is better.
lamont is good though.
stupid matchmaking from warren if he goes for it.

i think they will postpone, remember what happened with the last last minute replacement
Re: Khan - Kotelnik off?????
Posted: 13 Jun 2009, 16:08
by crusader
If they take Peterson on short notice the better hope he is out of shape and off his game. The big speed advantage Khan had against Kotelnik will be much less of a factor and Peterson probably hits harder or at worst, just as had as Kotelnik.
Re: Khan - Kotelnik off?????
Posted: 13 Jun 2009, 16:52
by Coco
Expect Alex Arthur to be a late arrival in the WBA l/w ratings
Re: Khan - Kotelnik off?????
Posted: 13 Jun 2009, 23:44
by Grilling Machine
Emerson Poncey Name Ghent wrote:Can Bobby Gunn drain in time.
Can Matlala do the pies?
Teeth are a lottery pain-wise. Of the four wisdom teeth I've had taken three were fine but one was agony. I didn't even go jogging for a fortnight after because I was afraid of upsetting it.
Re: Khan - Kotelnik off?????
Posted: 14 Jun 2009, 05:51
by Spud
What really p*sses me off about this is on teletext or somewhere I read that a Frank W arren spokesperson has been quoted as stating "we are trying to establish the situation" - in my opinion they already know and yet again this is a situation where tickets are being sold and if there is something that effects that show then the information should be given to the fans IMMEDIATELY.
I could go into a rant but wont - other than to say - a certain promoter and this sort of situation is not uncommon when you look back over the last few years.
Re: Khan - Kotelnik off?????
Posted: 14 Jun 2009, 05:53
by REAL_DEAL
whats bradley prescott weight at
![[icon_e_confused.gif] :confused:](./images/smilies/icon_e_confused.gif)
Re: Khan - Kotelnik off?????
Posted: 14 Jun 2009, 06:00
by Spud
Exactly Mr Real Deal - there are plenty of opponents out there - but expect to be dissapointed.
Re: Khan - Kotelnik off?????
Posted: 14 Jun 2009, 07:07
by The Law
hitman_hatton1 wrote:Emerson Poncey Name Ghent wrote:Lamont might beat him. I see him as the lesser of the two Peterson's.
Might be worth picking up a bargain ticket.
yeah anthony is better.
lamont is good though.
stupid matchmaking from warren if he goes for it.

I personally think Lamont is technically a better boxer than his brother, but Anthony punches harder.
Re: Khan - Kotelnik off?????
Posted: 14 Jun 2009, 12:03
by liamlion
Is Derek Chisora still on the bill?
I know he got banned, its just his name is still appearing in certain London newspapers as appearing on the bill. Clearly if he isnt, then fwank should be making efforts to amend the fight poster.
Re: Khan - Kotelnik off?????
Posted: 14 Jun 2009, 12:09
by The Law
liamlion wrote:Is Derek Chisora still on the bill?
I know he got banned, its just his name is still appearing in certain London newspapers as appearing on the bill. Clearly if he isnt, then fwank should be making efforts to amend the fight poster.
Derek is definitely not on the bill.
Re: Khan - Kotelnik off?????
Posted: 14 Jun 2009, 12:19
by WildWaylon
The whole event needs cacelling then. Surely it wont go ahead with Khan fighting a bum who has no chance of winning.
Re: Khan - Kotelnik off?????
Posted: 14 Jun 2009, 12:28
by Horse
WildWaylon wrote:The whole event needs cacelling then. Surely it wont go ahead with Khan fighting a bum who has no chance of winning.
Since when is Khan fighting a bum who has no chance of winning?
Re: Khan - Kotelnik off?????
Posted: 15 Jun 2009, 04:50
by stujones
There is NO way Khan should be fighting for a vacant/interim championship... doesn't he have to be mandatory first.
Re: Khan - Kotelnik off?????
Posted: 15 Jun 2009, 04:52
by Wales
Ortiz fighting for interim WBA on the 27th, Sky should add this card to the PPV (juarez john on the undercard).
Is the bill advertised as "world championship boxing" - If so are there any world title fights on the bill aside form Khan Kotelnik, surely ticket refunds will be applicable if not.
Re: Khan - Kotelnik off?????
Posted: 15 Jun 2009, 05:30
by hitman_hatton1
The Law wrote:I personally think Lamont is technically a better boxer than his brother, but Anthony punches harder.
i disagree with that.
i think lamont is a bit more rough and ready.
anthony is more technical stand up boxer.
bit more to his game.
both good though.
too good for khan anyway.

Re: Khan - Kotelnik off?????
Posted: 15 Jun 2009, 06:51
by The Law
hitman_hatton1 wrote:The Law wrote:I personally think Lamont is technically a better boxer than his brother, but Anthony punches harder.
i disagree with that.
i think lamont is a bit more rough and ready.
anthony is more technical stand up boxer.
bit more to his game.
both good though.
too good for khan anyway.

I've always considered Lamont as the more slick boxer out of the two (eventhough they are both pretty slick).
Re: Khan - Kotelnik off?????
Posted: 15 Jun 2009, 07:10
by leforge
Fight now on July 18th according to sky sports new.
Re: Khan - Kotelnik off?????
Posted: 15 Jun 2009, 09:35
by lirva
leforge wrote:Fight now on July 18th according to sky sports new.
Good news. So the June 20 show is scrapped completely then?