Re: haskins wins
Posted: 11 Jul 2009, 14:54
could u martin if u could go for it i pick u to do mhaskins and broadhurstTommy Gunn13 wrote:Could u do super flyweight Martin??
Page 2 of 2
Re: haskins wins
Posted: 11 Jul 2009, 15:03
leeharding wrote:could u martin if u could go for it i pick u to do mhaskins and broadhurstTommy Gunn13 wrote:Could u do super flyweight Martin??
Yeah id make Comfortable. I was under 8.6 for my last fight the day before. I walk around just over the Bantam weight limit..
When i turned over i was 7 stone 12 pound.. I will ask FM for the fight
Re: haskins wins
Posted: 11 Jul 2009, 16:37
Good hope it comes off,think Broadhurst might get to him before you tho..
I totally dislike Haskins,if u fight with that style your got to be able to back it up(Like Hamed)
I totally dislike Haskins,if u fight with that style your got to be able to back it up(Like Hamed)
Re: haskins wins
Posted: 11 Jul 2009, 16:41
Wasnt impressed by the Dickinson brothers boh looked sloppy but are still young and adjusting to the pro's
Re: haskins wins
Posted: 13 Jul 2009, 05:28
People are being kind to Haskins saying he is a poor mans Hamed, he's not even a poor mans Pickering. Slow, messy, bad balance, knackered after 3 rounds. Would back both Power and Broadhurst over him comfortably.
Fought a punch bag in Burkinshaw on Friday who wasn't ready and I still felt he looked shite.
Fought a punch bag in Burkinshaw on Friday who wasn't ready and I still felt he looked shite.
Re: haskins wins
Posted: 13 Jul 2009, 07:54
power v broadhurst ide like martin to destroy him very talented boxer but think he aint as gd as he thinks he is smash the pair of them martinLenny wrote:People are being kind to Haskins saying he is a poor mans Hamed, he's not even a poor mans Pickering. Slow, messy, bad balance, knackered after 3 rounds. Would back both Power and Broadhurst over him comfortably.
Fought a punch bag in Burkinshaw on Friday who wasn't ready and I still felt he looked shite.
Re: haskins wins
Posted: 13 Jul 2009, 10:04
I rate Broadhurst highly,i think he can go a long way....leeharding wrote:power v broadhurst ide like martin to destroy him very talented boxer but think he aint as gd as he thinks he is smash the pair of them martinLenny wrote:People are being kind to Haskins saying he is a poor mans Hamed, he's not even a poor mans Pickering. Slow, messy, bad balance, knackered after 3 rounds. Would back both Power and Broadhurst over him comfortably.
Fought a punch bag in Burkinshaw on Friday who wasn't ready and I still felt he looked shite.
Re: haskins wins
Posted: 13 Jul 2009, 12:51
i have never seen Broadhurst box but just from what I have read he would do Haskins. When I saw Haskins ring entrance and subsequent performance against Napa when he lost cos his arm was f*cked (and cos he was getting battered too) I though what an arrogant little get.
I mite not have seen the best of Haskins, in the ring, or from a personal POV, but LondonIrish on a good nite would beat him handily I think.
I mite not have seen the best of Haskins, in the ring, or from a personal POV, but LondonIrish on a good nite would beat him handily I think.
Re: haskins wins
Posted: 13 Jul 2009, 12:57
DefinitlyNorthEastBoxingFan wrote:i have never seen Broadhurst box but just from what I have read he would do Haskins. When I saw Haskins ring entrance and subsequent performance against Napa when he lost cos his arm was f*cked (and cos he was getting battered too) I though what an arrogant little get.
I mite not have seen the best of Haskins, in the ring, or from a personal POV, but LondonIrish on a good nite would beat him handily I think.