BoxRec

Thats just SKY being SKY. Fkking useless.

... is it safe to assume that all of the big fights will cost us (or you as I never pay for B/O) £15 big ones?

Mayweather
Pacquiao
Hatton - if he returns
Haye
Khan - perhaps four a year :surprised:

If those fighters fight twice a year, then that's ten PPV's.



One or two a year I can deal with.

But ten?

America has had to do it for years. We've been lucky it hasn't happened sooner.

Fecking Yanks. Always setting precedents.

Sky have been charging wrestling on ppv for years. The undercard better be good.

leforge wrote:Sky have been charging wrestling on ppv for years.

To me, that's like ITV charging you to watch Coronation Street.

D

Dioufy wrote:

leforge wrote:Sky have been charging wrestling on ppv for years.

To me, that's like ITV charging you to watch Coronation Street.

D

I'd pay to watch ken barlow kick off again some of his scraps were right thrillers,yes £15 pound to see the 'Weatherfield whirlwind' is a bargain

if Khan v Hatton is made i expect it will cost more than £15

Dioufy wrote:

leforge wrote:Sky have been charging wrestling on ppv for years.

To me, that's like ITV charging you to watch Coronation Street.

D

Isn't it only marquee events that they charge (Mania, Rumble, Summerslam)?