Page 2 of 2
Re: Ian Jacobs
Posted: 10 Sep 2009, 00:08
by Eric t
It was probably either
Briggs
Green
Oganov
bika
Maybe briggs!!!!
He is retired but who knows he might have had a sparr
I read that thomas adamek had a few broken bones in his face after his fight with briggs, brutal sport.
Floyd mayweather has the right idea, get hit as little as possible and make as much money as possible
Re: Ian Jacobs
Posted: 10 Sep 2009, 03:25
by isabella
Eric t wrote:AntonS wrote:Brute wrote:Note on the schedule that Ian Jacobs is to fight William Hadlow in Logan Queensland in an eight rounder on September 19.
Jacobs seems to be a newcomer to boxing. Is anybody familiar with him? Was he a "kick boxer"?
The show had been Postponed/Cancelled
Ian Jacobs sustained fractured eye socket cheekbone and nose during sparring
Who was he sparring!!!!on east forum Alex Leapai & Ian jacobs are sparring partners both train together in the Brisbane City and just reading The Herald in the same gym Leapai & Haumono sparred last night.
Whoever it was he must have had some serious power, ian is a very tough guy, he went the distance with Gurkan Ozkan, he took some pretty good shots, mundine used ozkan as a sparring partner in preparation for his fight with antwun echols, he said that he is a lion
Re: Ian Jacobs
Posted: 10 Sep 2009, 04:02
by Eric t
Thanks for the info
He shouldn't be sparring big punching heavyweights who have no self control, if that is the case.
You don't throw bombs at a guy who you outweigh by 30 kilos
Re: Ian Jacobs
Posted: 10 Sep 2009, 04:18
by AntonS
Eric t wrote:Thanks for the info
He shouldn't be sparring big punching heavyweights who have no self control, if that is the case.
You don't throw bombs at a guy who you outweigh by 30 kilos
I heard it was Fred "The General" Mundraby
Re: Ian Jacobs
Posted: 10 Sep 2009, 04:23
by Eric t
AntonS wrote:Eric t wrote:Thanks for the info
He shouldn't be sparring big punching heavyweights who have no self control, if that is the case.
You don't throw bombs at a guy who you outweigh by 30 kilos
I heard it was Fred "The General" Mundraby
You must be joking
Ian must have developed Osteoporosis if that is the case
Re: Ian Jacobs
Posted: 10 Sep 2009, 04:50
by AntonS
Eric t wrote:AntonS wrote:Eric t wrote:Thanks for the info
He shouldn't be sparring big punching heavyweights who have no self control, if that is the case.
You don't throw bombs at a guy who you outweigh by 30 kilos
I heard it was Fred "The General" Mundraby
You must be joking
Ian must have developed Osteoporosis if that is the case
In boxing ya gotta believe
everything
Re: Ian Jacobs
Posted: 10 Sep 2009, 06:52
by prickle
it was a mixture of varga 88kg schmitt 79kg and shannon king 72kg,apparently blew his nose after when had swelling on eye and bang up she went eye closed up,maybe never fight again if doesnt heal,is a clean break in eye socket.
Re: Ian Jacobs
Posted: 10 Sep 2009, 07:21
by AntonS
prickle wrote:it was a mixture of varga 88kg schmitt 79kg and shannon king 72kg,apparently blew his nose after when had swelling on eye and bang up she went eye closed up,maybe never fight again if doesnt heal,is a clean break in eye socket.
Was he wearing head-gear? If not.....WHY NOT??
Re: Ian Jacobs
Posted: 12 Sep 2009, 04:33
by Captnhook
Obviously too old and frail, should stay in retirement. Too old to try his hand in boxing and wouldn't go anywhere. Glory days (debatable as only a kickboxer) are over old man.
Re: Ian Jacobs
Posted: 07 Jan 2010, 23:33
by Streets
Ok, so I see that this topic has been left to die but has anyone got a new date for this sic match-up???
Re: Ian Jacobs
Posted: 07 Jan 2010, 23:46
by buster007
darchinyan was running out of sparring partners in oz, so it sounds like he has hurt another partner.
Re: Ian Jacobs
Posted: 08 Jan 2010, 02:39
by Hounddawg
Eric t wrote:It was probably either
Briggs
Green
Oganov
bika
Maybe briggs!!!!
He is retired but who knows he might have had a sparr
I read that thomas adamek had a few broken bones in his face after his fight with briggs, brutal sport.
Floyd mayweather has the right idea, get hit as little as possible and make as much money as possible
Where has this bloke gone, i know he came back with a different name, but once my sterling detective work came into play he disappeared again?
Re: Ian Jacobs
Posted: 09 Jan 2010, 06:19
by colin russell
He was sparing an 81 kg amature from Logan and yes he was wearing head gear.
Re: Ian Jacobs
Posted: 06 Jan 2011, 04:04
by adamheight
colin russell wrote:He was sparing an 81 kg amature from Logan and yes he was wearing head gear.
what was his name?
Re: Ian Jacobs
Posted: 06 Jan 2011, 07:45
by colin russell
What the Adamheight you took 12 months to ask that question, and I think you know who it was anyway.
Re: Ian Jacobs
Posted: 06 Jan 2011, 07:57
by adamheight
colin russell wrote:What the Adamheight you took 12 months to ask that question, and I think you know who it was anyway.
lol
Re: Ian Jacobs
Posted: 06 Jan 2011, 08:55
by dberry
Well, please enlighten us, who was it?
Re: Ian Jacobs
Posted: 07 Jan 2011, 08:44
by Hounddawg
A guy i know trains at his Gym, says he doesn't allow head gear and no time is kept while sparring.
Re: Ian Jacobs
Posted: 07 Jan 2011, 17:55
by dberry
Hounddawg wrote:A guy i know trains at his Gym, says he doesn't allow head gear and no time is kept while sparring.
Sensible man, and I say this without a hint of irony as I too refuse to wear headgear for sparring and advise against it.
Re: Ian Jacobs
Posted: 09 Jan 2011, 17:53
by Marlin
Why's that daz? To make sure you're truly battle tested?
Re: Ian Jacobs
Posted: 09 Jan 2011, 18:22
by dberry
A paper was released calling for head gear to be banned in competition in the early nineties, and the AMA quickly buried it. I managed to obtain one of these through a friend studying human movement. The paper was from a study on the effectiveness of head gear and basically suggests boxers should not regularly use head gear as it increases the risk of brain damage and 'bleeds'. It was found that the padding offered no extra real protection from trauma, the the head as target is made larger, peripheral vision is reduced allowing more punches to sneak in and what would have been glancing blows with the glove sliding off a slippery head actually would grip (leather on leather) causing traumatic torsional rotation.
The paper also pointed out that in competition, cuts and one punch knock outs where less likely, meaning fights that would naturally be stopped due superficial damage or one concussive blow would keep going causing fighters to sustain continuous damaging blows.
Re: Ian Jacobs
Posted: 09 Jan 2011, 18:35
by Marlin
Wow, that is interesting. Perception is a funny thing...
Re: Ian Jacobs
Posted: 09 Jan 2011, 18:51
by Beltane
Dberry's comment:
It was found that the padding offered no extra real protection from trauma, the the head as target is made larger, peripheral vision is reduced allowing....
has been raised for decades by medical authorities, officials attempting to lessen the damage and the same conclusion was reached that padding does not really protect the brain and infact that deaths had been recorded where head gear had been worn.
I remember reading a book by Ray Mitchell written in the 1960s about death and safety in the ring and a whole chapter was devoted to safety improvements where the impact in reducing damage by wearing head gear was discussed and the conclusion was drawn that head gear and variations of head gear provided little value in protecting the brain.