Re: Who had the best CHIN of all time? (not p4p)
Posted: 24 Aug 2009, 08:07
the atomic bull as he has only been wobbled in the second lewis fight and he wasnt protecting himself at the time
Really? What makes you think that?Robinson wrote:Foreman version 2.0 had a much better chin than
Foreman version 1.alpha.
This is a non-pound-for-pound listing, though.enrique wrote:Every list always omits the best chin of all time.
Ignacio Ara, top middleweight contender, European and Spanish champion was never stopped in a 175 fight career.
Holyfield got wobbled badly by Bert Cooper and went down. Bert was never that harder puncher all his ko's where againt very soft opposition. And Bowe KO Holyfield in there 3rd fight. Id say Pinklon Thomas had a better chin IMO. If it was HEART Holy would be on the list for sure.IKSRTFO wrote:Mcall, Flush hits from Mike Tyson couldn't bother him much enough for him to be Tyson's sparring partner and never been dropped. I wonder why Holifield is not on this list?
You're going to factor sparring sessions in your reasoning?IKSRTFO wrote:Mcall, Flush hits from Mike Tyson couldn't bother him much enough for him to be Tyson's sparring partner and never been dropped. I wonder why Holifield is not on this list?
Goodnight, Irene wrote:It's a somewhat soft line-up, though.
Foreman, Frazier, Holmes & the like are not realistic contenders for the best chin of any HW.
He did not leave himself as open while hunting for the kill,The Great John L wrote:Really? What makes you think that?Robinson wrote:Foreman version 2.0 had a much better chin than
Foreman version 1.alpha.
Greatest HW chin of all-time? These guys? I'll give you the benefit of the doubt & imagine you read it as my saying they have average chins. To suggest Larry Holmes or George Foreman had a chin on-par with the likes of George Chuvalo, Tex Cobb or Oliver McCall is laughable.Grimm wrote:Goodnight, Irene wrote:It's a somewhat soft line-up, though.
Foreman, Frazier, Holmes & the like are not realistic contenders for the best chin of any HW.
I'm guessing you've never watched any Holmes or Foreman fights.
If you're mentioning Mike Tyson, yes seriously. Mike probably wasn't a professional enigma of a sparring partner. McCall was Mike's sparring partner really based on his ability to take a punch. No on notoriously have that claim.Goodnight, Irene wrote:You're going to factor sparring sessions in your reasoning?IKSRTFO wrote:Mcall, Flush hits from Mike Tyson couldn't bother him much enough for him to be Tyson's sparring partner and never been dropped. I wonder why Holifield is not on this list?
Seriously?
Better defensive skills? DId you see the Stewart fight? Or how about the fight against the obese 4'11" Qawi?Robinson wrote:He did not leave himself as open while hunting for the kill,The Great John L wrote:Really? What makes you think that?Robinson wrote:Foreman version 2.0 had a much better chin than
Foreman version 1.alpha.
seemed to develop more strength, as he trained for this
and he had better defensive skills.
He seemed to be more relaxed, and had better wits and
experience which helped him to stay more resilient, as an
older fighter.
Though, as we now version 1.0 was no slouch and took
some hard n heavy shots.