Page 2 of 2
Re: Matthew Hatton to fight for IBO
Posted: 03 Sep 2009, 11:30
by alexpaterson
I see N'Dou winning much more expierenced at a higher level I see him winning a wide UD or late stoppage for N'Dou I dont think Hatton is wolrd class
Re: Matthew Hatton to fight for IBO
Posted: 03 Sep 2009, 12:07
by DAVE2005
THEBUTCH wrote:It would be a good international 10 rounder, or a good commonwealth title fight, but attaching anything else to it just stinks.
why nobody rates the ibo on here anyway so what do you care?
the lads will be getting more money with it being a 12 rounder so good for them i say,and its a decent matchup so i dont see why people are complaing.you cant suite some people
![[icon_witsend.gif] :witzend:](./images/smilies/icon_witsend.gif)
Re: Matthew Hatton to fight for IBO
Posted: 04 Sep 2009, 06:32
by Captain Hook
I heard "world title shot" on the radio several times yesterday before finding out it was IBO.
:(
Joke...
Re: Matthew Hatton to fight for IBO
Posted: 04 Sep 2009, 07:15
by Adamj1987
Captain Hook wrote:I heard "world title shot" on the radio several times yesterday before finding out it was IBO.
:(
Joke...
indeed
Re: Matthew Hatton to fight for IBO
Posted: 04 Sep 2009, 07:58
by coneye
terrdilk wrote:why is every one getting on the back of the title when surley we should be getting behind our lads to bring another title home i personally dont rate mathew but i wish him all the luck in winning the title its good for british boxing
No its not, its good for Mathew Hatton thats all , if he wins he promotes himself has world champ, defends against lack lustre opponents , cons fans into buying tickets for world title shows ect ect ,
To do the best for british boxing he should try fighting at British level for decnt proper titles.
Re: Matthew Hatton to fight for IBO
Posted: 04 Sep 2009, 08:12
by Adamj1987
DAVE2005 wrote:THEBUTCH wrote:It would be a good international 10 rounder, or a good commonwealth title fight, but attaching anything else to it just stinks.
why nobody rates the ibo on here anyway so what do you care?
the lads will be getting more money with it being a 12 rounder so good for them i say,and its a decent matchup so i dont see why people are complaing.you cant suite some people
![[icon_witsend.gif] :witzend:](./images/smilies/icon_witsend.gif)
its is a decnt matchup tahts not the problem the problem is if hatton wins hes a titlist and will be promoted as a world champ when hes cant even get a brittish title
Re: Matthew Hatton to fight for IBO
Posted: 04 Sep 2009, 08:14
by leforge
Hatton won't win!
Re: Matthew Hatton to fight for IBO
Posted: 04 Sep 2009, 08:16
by Adamj1987
leforge wrote:Hatton won't win!
he shouldnt but you cant rule out some homecooking of teh scorecards or the ref ending it early if lovemore looks in trouble just a little bit
Re: Matthew Hatton to fight for IBO
Posted: 04 Sep 2009, 08:27
by leforge
I hope he loses otherwise I can see Hattons try to con us with more IBO shite!
Re: Matthew Hatton to fight for IBO
Posted: 04 Sep 2009, 10:13
by n1ebf
coneye wrote:terrdilk wrote:why is every one getting on the back of the title when surley we should be getting behind our lads to bring another title home i personally dont rate mathew but i wish him all the luck in winning the title its good for british boxing
No its not, its good for Mathew Hatton thats all , if he wins he promotes himself has world champ, defends against lack lustre opponents , cons fans into buying tickets for world title shows ect ect ,
To do the best for british boxing he should try fighting at British level for decnt proper titles.
exactly right
IMO he'll have rung the radio stations himself, or got his promotional outfit (his brother) to do it, rather than them come knocking on his door IMO.
I think he's wanting the Brit title to become vacant and to fight somebody like a Stuart Elwell, no disrespect or Barrie Jones type fighter for it. i.e. somebody less experienced, or just not as good...rather than try to win it the proper way, which is from a champion, or against a similarly prepared opponent. IMO.
Re: Matthew Hatton to fight for IBO
Posted: 04 Sep 2009, 10:21
by Captain Hook
No offence to Matthew but he's not very good, has lost to the likes of Watson - who is domestic level at best - and won't beat N'Dou.
But if he does, as someone mentioned, we will have to listen to how there have been two world champs in the Hatton family, and that will be sickening.
I can just see the faces of Ma and Pa Hatton now....
Re: Matthew Hatton to fight for IBO
Posted: 05 Sep 2009, 13:12
by steve689
It's not a bad fight if that ridiculous bauble wasn't involved. That said, even though Hatton could keep it competetive early on I see him getting stopped in about the 7th or 8th round. N'Dou has been in with such a higher class of opposition you could even argue this as a mismatch.
Re: Matthew Hatton to fight for IBO
Posted: 05 Sep 2009, 17:05
by Phenomenal-Nutrition
Matthew has done a good job of riding Ricky's coat tails and a good few Hatton supporters might buy it especially as he is using his brother's trick of using a phoney world title. Ndou was a perenial top10 gatekeeper at 140, and now at 147 is 38 a lightish hitter and a decent name for the taking. Matthew probably isn't good enough to beat him fair and square but if the judging is close it will go Mat's way because he's the home fighter and he's already benefited from 2 or so decisions that should have gone against him. However Ndou is better than Tackie who beat him imo and may well give Mat a pasting
Its a con, but the real world is full of cons
Re: Matthew Hatton to fight for IBO
Posted: 05 Sep 2009, 18:21
by stujones
PN - you thought Ben Tackie beat Matthew???
Re: Matthew Hatton to fight for IBO
Posted: 05 Sep 2009, 19:06
by danieljenkins
i dont wish him good luck because hes fat boys brother he gets a shot
kel brook and john odonnell desevers it more there better fighters. its not about how good you are anymore its about who you know
Re: Matthew Hatton to fight for IBO
Posted: 05 Sep 2009, 19:39
by brian13
13th of November at the MEN Arena LMAO. What's on in the MEN on the 14th of November, a little thing called UFC.
Re: Matthew Hatton to fight for IBO
Posted: 06 Sep 2009, 08:55
by brian13
boxrec wrote:Who would win if Matthew Hatton fought Tom Glover?
Hatton would win by decision
Re: Matthew Hatton to fight for IBO
Posted: 06 Sep 2009, 13:28
by sgtcecil
boxrec wrote:Who would win if Matthew Hatton fought Tom Glover?
glover by KO
![[icon_e_biggrin.gif] :D](./images/smilies/icon_e_biggrin.gif)
DD
Re: Matthew Hatton to fight for IBO
Posted: 07 Sep 2009, 11:22
by slapbangwhallop
there is an article about this future "world champion" and his IBO fight in the MEN today!
Re: Matthew Hatton to fight for IBO
Posted: 07 Sep 2009, 11:35
by n1ebf
Re: Matthew Hatton to fight for IBO
Posted: 07 Sep 2009, 12:41
by slapbangwhallop
Re: Matthew Hatton to fight for IBO
Posted: 07 Sep 2009, 13:12
by hitman_hatton1
he was on talksport this afternoon.
talking about the way he's worked his way into a world title shot by beating the likes of tackie and bami.
![[icon_e_biggrin.gif] :D](./images/smilies/icon_e_biggrin.gif)
Re: Matthew Hatton to fight for IBO
Posted: 07 Sep 2009, 13:31
by stujones
Why can't we forget about the title, and mention that it is a quality step up for Matthew.
Re: Matthew Hatton to fight for IBO
Posted: 11 Sep 2009, 10:42
by 1southpaw
Re: Matthew Hatton to fight for IBO
Posted: 11 Sep 2009, 10:51
by landon
Phenomenal-Nutrition wrote:Matthew has done a good job of riding Ricky's coat tails and a good few Hatton supporters might buy it especially as he is using his brother's trick of using a phoney world title. Ndou was a perenial top10 gatekeeper at 140, and now at 147 is 38 a lightish hitter and a decent name for the taking. Matthew probably isn't good enough to beat him fair and square but if the judging is close it will go Mat's way because he's the home fighter and he's already benefited from 2 or so decisions that should have gone against him. However Ndou is better than Tackie who beat him imo and may well give Mat a pasting
Its a con, but the real world is full of cons
couldnt agree with you more