Page 2 of 2
Re: Tyson Fury Fight
Posted: 11 Sep 2009, 17:03
by landon
me to please
Re: Tyson Fury Fight
Posted: 11 Sep 2009, 17:06
by jizzle
Maelstrom wrote:What a bunch of leeches.
All you mob come on here and complain about the quality of fights on offer in this country.
But... when there is one you want to watch, you don't step up and take out the subscription.
What incentive is there for anybody to put on good fights if they dont get paid for it?
You are obviously all going to say that there aren't enough other decent fights to justify the monthly payment to Sky, but if you feel that is the case you should go without, not break the law. That's tough - I pay because I am a boxing fan. The only way boxing will get better on Sky is if more people pay for it, not less - and this encourages that. And don't forget the £19.50 isn't just for boxing.
And.. even if there were 4 good fights a month most of you still wouldn't pay the subscription.
Sky and Maloney should ask Boxrec to ban threads like this instantly.
I havent posted for ages, but my blood is boiling.
Here here...
ADDITION - Unless its some crap online stream like Froch/Taylor and Woods/Cloud
Re: Tyson Fury Fight
Posted: 11 Sep 2009, 17:08
by bynino
and me please
Re: Tyson Fury Fight
Posted: 11 Sep 2009, 17:09
by MPG
bynino wrote:and me please
Sent
Re: Tyson Fury Fight
Posted: 11 Sep 2009, 17:11
by n1ebf
and me please
Re: Tyson Fury Fight
Posted: 11 Sep 2009, 17:17
by MPG
NorthEastBoxingFan wrote:and me please
Sent
Re: Tyson Fury Fight
Posted: 11 Sep 2009, 17:18
by n1ebf
Maelstrom wrote:What a bunch of leeches.
All you mob come on here and complain about the quality of fights on offer in this country.
But... when there is one you want to watch, you don't step up and take out the subscription.
What incentive is there for anybody to put on good fights if they dont get paid for it?
You are obviously all going to say that there aren't enough other decent fights to justify the monthly payment to Sky, but if you feel that is the case you should go without, not break the law. That's tough - I pay because I am a boxing fan. The only way boxing will get better on Sky is if more people pay for it, not less - and this encourages that. And don't forget the £19.50 isn't just for boxing.
And.. even if there were 4 good fights a month most of you still wouldn't pay the subscription.
Sky and Maloney should ask Boxrec to ban threads like this instantly.
I havent posted for ages, but my blood is boiling.
Yeah but you have to admit when you see that Ford Football jingle 12 times in 2 hours do you not want to just end it all and shoot yourself in the head?
When they stop the garbage, and the dire fights, and the sky sports news excessively tarted up women, and the duller than dishwater saturation coverage and ads for football.......that's when I'll consider Sky Sports pal.
I preferred Setanta tbh, that I paid for.
I take your point on the pub/ mate point though.
Re: Tyson Fury Fight
Posted: 11 Sep 2009, 17:19
by The_Don1
someone needs some man tampax around here!
Re: Tyson Fury Fight
Posted: 11 Sep 2009, 17:19
by brian13
Fury losing the first 2
Re: Tyson Fury Fight
Posted: 11 Sep 2009, 17:22
by whicker
brian13 wrote:Fury losing the first 2
On in play betting he is a clear favourite.
Re: Tyson Fury Fight
Posted: 11 Sep 2009, 17:22
by steve689
Good man Brian! RBR please.
Or is that morally unacceptable as well
D
Re: Tyson Fury Fight
Posted: 11 Sep 2009, 17:23
by whicker
steve689 wrote:Good man Brian! RBR please.
Or is that morally unacceptable as well
D
I've started a fresh round by round topic- handy if people could post there!
Re: Tyson Fury Fight
Posted: 11 Sep 2009, 17:31
by brian13
After 5 3 for mc dermott, 1 even, 1 fury