Your Fury - Mcdermott scorecards

oliverfennell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5564
Joined: 15 Feb 2007, 06:37

Re: Your Fury - Mcdermott scorecards

Post by oliverfennell »

A lot of people had it a draw, and me too, althoughI did watch it for the first time only after seeing the result and reading the fall-out, so I approached my viewing of it with that in mind, i.e. seeing how the ref could score it the way he did.

However I'd say of the five rounds I gave Fury, only three were definite; the other two were close.

Did commentary sway opinions? Possibly. It's not unusual for me to disagree with the commentators over a round, but when I hear they had it the other way, it can make me doubt myself. That's natural.

And another point to bear in mind - when an underdog is doing well, you perhaps notice his work more than the other guy's, because the very fact of him doing well is a surprising/spectacular sight.
Adamj1987
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5400
Joined: 14 Oct 2008, 16:16

Re: Your Fury - Mcdermott scorecards

Post by Adamj1987 »

oliverfennell wrote:A lot of people had it a draw, and me too, althoughI did watch it for the first time only after seeing the result and reading the fall-out, so I approached my viewing of it with that in mind, i.e. seeing how the ref could score it the way he did.

However I'd say of the five rounds I gave Fury, only three were definite; the other two were close.

Did commentary sway opinions? Possibly. It's not unusual for me to disagree with the commentators over a round, but when I hear they had it the other way, it can make me doubt myself. That's natural.

And another point to bear in mind - when an underdog is doing well, you perhaps notice his work more than the other guy's, because the very fact of him doing well is a surprising/spectacular sight.
i agreed with the comentators about the work mcderrmott did he did the better shots but the rounds i gave tyson are when he outworked mcdermott and he didnt do that enough for me
Asterix
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7128
Joined: 02 Nov 2007, 10:42

Re: Your Fury - Mcdermott scorecards

Post by Asterix »

Superheavyweight wrote:I’m all for eliminating draws, but how exactly?

13 rounds and no pussy footing?
I don't think you can eliminate draws, and it's not fair to. What about if two fighters were completely evenly matched throughout the fight? You think one of them should still win?

Say you go with your idea of no even rounds and an odd number of total rounds, a knock down can still occur to make the fight a draw.
oliverfennell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5564
Joined: 15 Feb 2007, 06:37

Re: Your Fury - Mcdermott scorecards

Post by oliverfennell »

Superheavyweight wrote:
Asterix wrote:
Superheavyweight wrote:I’m all for eliminating draws, but how exactly?

13 rounds and no pussy footing?
I don't think you can eliminate draws, and it's not fair to. What about if two fighters were completely evenly matched throughout the fight? You think one of them should still win?

Say you go with your idea of no even rounds and an odd number of total rounds, a knock down can still occur to make the fight a draw.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R11xwjLIQQ0&fmt=18
Your point being?

(At least it wasn't a video of a Russian operatic version of The Banana Bunch In Space, which I half-expected it to be)
oliverfennell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5564
Joined: 15 Feb 2007, 06:37

Re: Your Fury - Mcdermott scorecards

Post by oliverfennell »

Superheavyweight wrote:Tyson Fury vs. John McDermott
How does countering Asterix's argument that draws are valid results, and that even if we DID use your system, you wouldn't eliminate draws because of the incidence of knockdowns, with a video of a fight which WASN'T a draw, work?
jBacca
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5563
Joined: 14 Sep 2008, 17:40

Re: Your Fury - Mcdermott scorecards

Post by jBacca »

Aslong as rounds can be scored a draw, then draws won't be eliminated.
Dioufy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7351
Joined: 16 Sep 2006, 23:09

Re: Your Fury - Mcdermott scorecards

Post by Dioufy »

DG. wrote:98-92 to Mcdermott.

:DDD
Same.
oliverfennell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5564
Joined: 15 Feb 2007, 06:37

Re: Your Fury - Mcdermott scorecards

Post by oliverfennell »

Superheavyweight wrote:I was referring to this.
Asterix wrote:I don't think you can eliminate draws, and it's not fair to. What about if two fighters were completely evenly matched throughout the fight? You think one of them should still win?

Say you go with your idea of no even rounds and an odd number of total rounds, a knock down can still occur to make the fight a draw.
But the score was 98-92. What's your point??
brian13
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1853
Joined: 07 Dec 2008, 15:01

Re: Your Fury - Mcdermott scorecards

Post by brian13 »

I had it 98 - 93 Mc Dermott
Nightmare Roy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16417
Joined: 18 May 2003, 17:29

Re: Your Fury - Mcdermott scorecards

Post by Nightmare Roy »

Off the top of my head i can't remember but i had Big John winning by 3 rounds, I know i was swearing at the TV when i heard the refs card and so was my Missis
n1ebf
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4267
Joined: 20 Sep 2007, 10:33

Re: Your Fury - Mcdermott scorecards

Post by n1ebf »

i scored it Mcdermott 98 Fury 94 O Connor 10,000.
alexpaterson
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4310
Joined: 22 Feb 2009, 11:22

Re: Your Fury - Mcdermott scorecards

Post by alexpaterson »

7-3 to McDermott he was outjabbing the 5inch taller man he was overwealming Fury he showed how to beat Fury walk forward with head movement and throw straight punches as he has a poor defence and lacks power imo
oliverfennell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5564
Joined: 15 Feb 2007, 06:37

Re: Your Fury - Mcdermott scorecards

Post by oliverfennell »

Superheavyweight wrote:Who should have won, Fury or McDermott?
I scored it a draw, but I wasn't working the fight. Your system would have had no bearing on this fight or O'Connor's verdict.
Post Reply