Your Fury - Mcdermott scorecards
-
oliverfennell
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 5564
- Joined: 15 Feb 2007, 06:37
Re: Your Fury - Mcdermott scorecards
A lot of people had it a draw, and me too, althoughI did watch it for the first time only after seeing the result and reading the fall-out, so I approached my viewing of it with that in mind, i.e. seeing how the ref could score it the way he did.
However I'd say of the five rounds I gave Fury, only three were definite; the other two were close.
Did commentary sway opinions? Possibly. It's not unusual for me to disagree with the commentators over a round, but when I hear they had it the other way, it can make me doubt myself. That's natural.
And another point to bear in mind - when an underdog is doing well, you perhaps notice his work more than the other guy's, because the very fact of him doing well is a surprising/spectacular sight.
However I'd say of the five rounds I gave Fury, only three were definite; the other two were close.
Did commentary sway opinions? Possibly. It's not unusual for me to disagree with the commentators over a round, but when I hear they had it the other way, it can make me doubt myself. That's natural.
And another point to bear in mind - when an underdog is doing well, you perhaps notice his work more than the other guy's, because the very fact of him doing well is a surprising/spectacular sight.
Re: Your Fury - Mcdermott scorecards
i agreed with the comentators about the work mcderrmott did he did the better shots but the rounds i gave tyson are when he outworked mcdermott and he didnt do that enough for meoliverfennell wrote:A lot of people had it a draw, and me too, althoughI did watch it for the first time only after seeing the result and reading the fall-out, so I approached my viewing of it with that in mind, i.e. seeing how the ref could score it the way he did.
However I'd say of the five rounds I gave Fury, only three were definite; the other two were close.
Did commentary sway opinions? Possibly. It's not unusual for me to disagree with the commentators over a round, but when I hear they had it the other way, it can make me doubt myself. That's natural.
And another point to bear in mind - when an underdog is doing well, you perhaps notice his work more than the other guy's, because the very fact of him doing well is a surprising/spectacular sight.
Re: Your Fury - Mcdermott scorecards
I don't think you can eliminate draws, and it's not fair to. What about if two fighters were completely evenly matched throughout the fight? You think one of them should still win?Superheavyweight wrote:I’m all for eliminating draws, but how exactly?
13 rounds and no pussy footing?
Say you go with your idea of no even rounds and an odd number of total rounds, a knock down can still occur to make the fight a draw.
-
oliverfennell
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 5564
- Joined: 15 Feb 2007, 06:37
Re: Your Fury - Mcdermott scorecards
Your point being?Superheavyweight wrote:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R11xwjLIQQ0&fmt=18Asterix wrote:I don't think you can eliminate draws, and it's not fair to. What about if two fighters were completely evenly matched throughout the fight? You think one of them should still win?Superheavyweight wrote:I’m all for eliminating draws, but how exactly?
13 rounds and no pussy footing?
Say you go with your idea of no even rounds and an odd number of total rounds, a knock down can still occur to make the fight a draw.
(At least it wasn't a video of a Russian operatic version of The Banana Bunch In Space, which I half-expected it to be)
-
oliverfennell
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 5564
- Joined: 15 Feb 2007, 06:37
Re: Your Fury - Mcdermott scorecards
How does countering Asterix's argument that draws are valid results, and that even if we DID use your system, you wouldn't eliminate draws because of the incidence of knockdowns, with a video of a fight which WASN'T a draw, work?Superheavyweight wrote:Tyson Fury vs. John McDermott
Re: Your Fury - Mcdermott scorecards
Aslong as rounds can be scored a draw, then draws won't be eliminated.
Re: Your Fury - Mcdermott scorecards
Same.DG. wrote:98-92 to Mcdermott.
DD
-
oliverfennell
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 5564
- Joined: 15 Feb 2007, 06:37
Re: Your Fury - Mcdermott scorecards
But the score was 98-92. What's your point??Superheavyweight wrote:I was referring to this.
Asterix wrote:I don't think you can eliminate draws, and it's not fair to. What about if two fighters were completely evenly matched throughout the fight? You think one of them should still win?
Say you go with your idea of no even rounds and an odd number of total rounds, a knock down can still occur to make the fight a draw.
Re: Your Fury - Mcdermott scorecards
I had it 98 - 93 Mc Dermott
-
Nightmare Roy
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 16417
- Joined: 18 May 2003, 17:29
Re: Your Fury - Mcdermott scorecards
Off the top of my head i can't remember but i had Big John winning by 3 rounds, I know i was swearing at the TV when i heard the refs card and so was my Missis
Re: Your Fury - Mcdermott scorecards
i scored it Mcdermott 98 Fury 94 O Connor 10,000.
-
alexpaterson
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 4310
- Joined: 22 Feb 2009, 11:22
Re: Your Fury - Mcdermott scorecards
7-3 to McDermott he was outjabbing the 5inch taller man he was overwealming Fury he showed how to beat Fury walk forward with head movement and throw straight punches as he has a poor defence and lacks power imo
-
oliverfennell
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 5564
- Joined: 15 Feb 2007, 06:37
Re: Your Fury - Mcdermott scorecards
I scored it a draw, but I wasn't working the fight. Your system would have had no bearing on this fight or O'Connor's verdict.Superheavyweight wrote:Who should have won, Fury or McDermott?