Re: Froch vs Dirrell TV Coverage
Posted: 05 Oct 2009, 16:40
No but we'll find a way for you mate, PM me on the day.leforge wrote:Is this going to be on Virginmedia?
No but we'll find a way for you mate, PM me on the day.leforge wrote:Is this going to be on Virginmedia?
Would be appreciated here too if at all possible.G0mez wrote:No but we'll find a way for you mate, PM me on the day.leforge wrote:Is this going to be on Virginmedia?
leforge wrote:By the looks of it, its sky only.
true but the the thing is, if froch was a warren fighter, if have to have a different attitude to even go wth that promoter, meaning - like in some kind of alternate universe - he'd only want the easiest fights for the best money. meaning no bloody way would he be fighting the likes of pascal, taylor, then dirrell and - is this one next? - kessler. it just isn't an ideal world.Phenomenal-Nutrition wrote:Hennessey really is piss poor at promoting his fighters. So not only is this on PPV meaning most wont see it, it might also be anyone with Virgin/Freevie dont even have the option to buy it? Then he couldnt even get Froch a proper world title fight TV deal against Taylor? Say what you want about Mr Warren but I guarantee if the roles were reversed Froch would be on Sky/ITV or Sky PPV
I'm not sure if thats true or not, Hamed fought some top fighters under Warren. Team Hatton was very cautious themselves, Warren reckoned they turned down all types of fights and they were cautious after Warren too. He did make the Tyszu fight and he did make the Lacy, KEssler and Hopkins fights for Calzaghe. HE also tried to make Harris/Mitchell fights for Hatton and Glen Johnson/Hopkins for Joe, don't think it was all his fight, these fights happening as they can be in his interest. Still hes given his a load of dross and conned us into believing hes selling something he isntAutobarn wrote:true but the the thing is, if froch was a warren fighter, if have to have a different attitude to even go wth that promoter, meaning - like in some kind of alternate universe - he'd only want the easiest fights for the best money. meaning no bloody way would he be fighting the likes of pascal, taylor, then dirrell and - is this one next? - kessler. it just isn't an ideal world.Phenomenal-Nutrition wrote:Hennessey really is piss poor at promoting his fighters. So not only is this on PPV meaning most wont see it, it might also be anyone with Virgin/Freevie dont even have the option to buy it? Then he couldnt even get Froch a proper world title fight TV deal against Taylor? Say what you want about Mr Warren but I guarantee if the roles were reversed Froch would be on Sky/ITV or Sky PPV
I fookin' hope so.Adamj1987 wrote:anyone know if they will show the abraham fight on the big screen at nottingham?
this is what warren was saying about the mitchell fight falling thru in 2004.Phenomenal-Nutrition wrote:I'm not sure if thats true or not, Hamed fought some top fighters under Warren. Team Hatton was very cautious themselves, Warren reckoned they turned down all types of fights and they were cautious after Warren too. He did make the Tyszu fight and he did make the Lacy, KEssler and Hopkins fights for Calzaghe. HE also tried to make Harris/Mitchell fights for Hatton and Glen Johnson/Hopkins for Joe, don't think it was all his fight, these fights happening as they can be in his interest. Still hes given his a load of dross and conned us into believing hes selling something he isnt
What a dumb ass statement.Frochattack! wrote:Both Andres in this tournament are absolute rubbish! At least Ward has beaten someone in Miranda that used to be a contender of sorts. Dirrell has no such qualifications.
yes, this is rocky territory. sorting out whose fault it was, warren's or the fighter's. we could all probably argue about all this forever. i have no doubt that hatton (i can fight micky mouse in manchester and the fans will watch) and "sicknote" joe have operated with caution, extreme caution. on the other hand, as you say, warren has served up some real steaming plates of muck. and then we have his options. the haye-mac negotiations seemed to go on forever until haye was dead at the weight and had recognition as "the man". been hearing that warren wanted 4 fight options on murray to fight khan (but this is on ESB forum so it's hard to verify).Phenomenal-Nutrition wrote:I'm not sure if thats true or not, Hamed fought some top fighters under Warren. Team Hatton was very cautious themselves, Warren reckoned they turned down all types of fights and they were cautious after Warren too. He did make the Tyszu fight and he did make the Lacy, KEssler and Hopkins fights for Calzaghe. HE also tried to make Harris/Mitchell fights for Hatton and Glen Johnson/Hopkins for Joe, don't think it was all his fight, these fights happening as they can be in his interest. Still hes given his a load of dross and conned us into believing hes selling something he isntAutobarn wrote:true but the the thing is, if froch was a warren fighter, if have to have a different attitude to even go wth that promoter, meaning - like in some kind of alternate universe - he'd only want the easiest fights for the best money. meaning no bloody way would he be fighting the likes of pascal, taylor, then dirrell and - is this one next? - kessler. it just isn't an ideal world.Phenomenal-Nutrition wrote:Hennessey really is piss poor at promoting his fighters. So not only is this on PPV meaning most wont see it, it might also be anyone with Virgin/Freevie dont even have the option to buy it? Then he couldnt even get Froch a proper world title fight TV deal against Taylor? Say what you want about Mr Warren but I guarantee if the roles were reversed Froch would be on Sky/ITV or Sky PPV
they are both good talents, the american andres. definitelythey are suspect - both have been down and hurt. both appear to be pretty much one handed.jamesmcdonnell wrote:What a dumb ass statement.Frochattack! wrote:Both Andres in this tournament are absolute rubbish! At least Ward has beaten someone in Miranda that used to be a contender of sorts. Dirrell has no such qualifications.
Ward dominated Miranda, a former world title challenger from bell to bell without taking a significant punch the whole fight, if you don't think that is a stellar performance, you're demented. Ward was also a standout amateur and gold medalist.
It may be too early in his career to be taking on the likes of Kessler, but Ward is an exceptional talent.
Autobarn wrote:they are both good talents, the american andres. definitelythey are suspect - both have been down and hurt. both appear to be pretty much one handed.jamesmcdonnell wrote:What a dumb ass statement.Frochattack! wrote:Both Andres in this tournament are absolute rubbish! At least Ward has beaten someone in Miranda that used to be a contender of sorts. Dirrell has no such qualifications.
Ward dominated Miranda, a former world title challenger from bell to bell without taking a significant punch the whole fight, if you don't think that is a stellar performance, you're demented. Ward was also a standout amateur and gold medalist.
It may be too early in his career to be taking on the likes of Kessler, but Ward is an exceptional talent.
vs inferior foes ward looks like the 2nd coming of roy jones. vs decent comp, he looks one handed, a bit short, and a bit cautious. he well beat miranda, but he was disappointed in his own showing. ward was mincing a lot in that fight, reminding me somewhat of ottke. he looked like ottke in the body of mundine. sort of.