Warren on Audley

Twinkle Toes
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3342
Joined: 22 Sep 2003, 08:38

Re: Warren on Audley

Post by Twinkle Toes »

Can't help but feel that Warren is more annoyed that he missed out on the cash cow that Audley once was.

If the Chisora fight can be made, Harrison should take it.
Spud
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Warren on Audley

Post by Spud »

My Name Is Earl wrote:I know he has his haters, but looking forward to Wazza's book. :KO:

Big Ord being Haye's first defence would'nt be a surprise.
Yep - I think it will be a good read.
thepocketrocket
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3283
Joined: 16 Jan 2003, 06:26

Re: Warren on Audley

Post by thepocketrocket »

Did Warren outwork him or spark him clean out?? Nah, that was Guinn and Sprotty! Case closed
Finn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5509
Joined: 07 May 2009, 15:56

Re: Warren on Audley

Post by Finn »

thepocketrocket wrote:Did Warren outwork him or spark him clean out?? Nah, that was Guinn and Sprotty! Case closed

I think his point was if it wasnt for allegedly he would have got the big fights earlier instead of taking dangerous, no win fights. Khan, Hatton and Calzaghe got to avoid alot of domestic competition, fights that they would have won but there was always a risk they could loose from a clear punch like - sprott v harrison.
Boxingmad
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 670
Joined: 12 Jul 2004, 07:04

Re: Warren on Audley

Post by Boxingmad »

Allegedly was making sense there for once - what is Fraudley gonna do now? Even a work colleague of mine who watched on Friday says that he looks frightened when he fights!

He'll get into the domestic mix maybe, but I can see Chisora and McDermott beating him at this stage. I still haven't made up my mind on Tyson Fury yet.
Finn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5509
Joined: 07 May 2009, 15:56

Re: Warren on Audley

Post by Finn »

Boxingmad wrote:Allegedly was making sense there for once - what is Fraudley gonna do now? Even a work colleague of mine who watched on Friday says that he looks frightened when he fights!

He'll get into the domestic mix maybe, but I can see Chisora and McDermott beating him at this stage. I still haven't made up my mind on Tyson Fury yet.
oh well if your work colleague said so it must be true.
thepocketrocket
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3283
Joined: 16 Jan 2003, 06:26

Re: Warren on Audley

Post by thepocketrocket »

kingfinn wrote:
thepocketrocket wrote:Did Warren outwork him or spark him clean out?? Nah, that was Guinn and Sprotty! Case closed

I think his point was if it wasnt for allegedly he would have got the big fights earlier instead of taking dangerous, no win fights. Khan, Hatton and Calzaghe got to avoid alot of domestic competition, fights that they would have won but there was always a risk they could loose from a clear punch like - sprott v harrison.

Since when was Danny Williams(beaten by anyone remotely good)Domonick Guinn( a faded force) and Michale Sprott(barelely capabale of winning a British title) dangerous for a man who is supposedly world class?????? If these guys beat him Christ, what would Chagaev and the Klits do!

The guys he fought were springboards to good guys, if he wasnt capable of beating them thats his fault, not Warrens!

Unless he expected to jump from Matthew Ellis to VK!! Audley is delusional!!
hitman_hatton1
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6150
Joined: 26 Nov 2003, 20:57

Re: Warren on Audley

Post by hitman_hatton1 »

apparently he was on talksport this morning but i missed it.

i bet he was coming out with the usual.

probably slagging off prizefighter as well.

prizefighter is selling better than his shows outside of khan fights. :oops:
yiddo14
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Warren on Audley

Post by yiddo14 »

kingfinn wrote:
thepocketrocket wrote:Did Warren outwork him or spark him clean out?? Nah, that was Guinn and Sprotty! Case closed

I think his point was if it wasnt for allegedly he would have got the big fights earlier instead of taking dangerous, no win fights. Khan, Hatton and Calzaghe got to avoid alot of domestic competition, fights that they would have won but there was always a risk they could loose from a clear punch like - sprott v harrison.

Audley has never been in a dangerous, no win fight though.
Hatton's biggest domestic danger was Witter, a genuine world class banger who became a genuine world champion himself.
Audley's so called dangerous, no win fights have come against Sprott(never been any better than top 35 in the world)and Williams(got sparked everytime he has stepped up above domestic level bar the Tyson fight)
Finn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5509
Joined: 07 May 2009, 15:56

Re: Warren on Audley

Post by Finn »

thepocketrocket wrote:
kingfinn wrote:
thepocketrocket wrote:Did Warren outwork him or spark him clean out?? Nah, that was Guinn and Sprotty! Case closed

I think his point was if it wasnt for allegedly he would have got the big fights earlier instead of taking dangerous, no win fights. Khan, Hatton and Calzaghe got to avoid alot of domestic competition, fights that they would have won but there was always a risk they could loose from a clear punch like - sprott v harrison.

Since when was Danny Williams(beaten by anyone remotely good)Domonick Guinn( a faded force) and Michale Sprott(barelely capabale of winning a British title) dangerous for a man who is supposedly world class?????? If these guys beat him Christ, what would Chagaev and the Klits do!

The guys he fought were springboards to good guys, if he wasnt capable of beating them thats his fault, not Warrens!

Unless he expected to jump from Matthew Ellis to VK!! Audley is delusional!!
I assume you mean audley harrison not danny williams.
thepocketrocket
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3283
Joined: 16 Jan 2003, 06:26

Re: Warren on Audley

Post by thepocketrocket »

You misread it, maybe due the the brackets, i was asking why Danny, Guinn and Sprott were dangerous!! Deliberatretly didnt mention Audleys name!!!
hitman_hatton1
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6150
Joined: 26 Nov 2003, 20:57

Re: Warren on Audley

Post by hitman_hatton1 »

yiddo14 wrote:
kingfinn wrote:
thepocketrocket wrote:Did Warren outwork him or spark him clean out?? Nah, that was Guinn and Sprotty! Case closed

I think his point was if it wasnt for allegedly he would have got the big fights earlier instead of taking dangerous, no win fights. Khan, Hatton and Calzaghe got to avoid alot of domestic competition, fights that they would have won but there was always a risk they could loose from a clear punch like - sprott v harrison.

Audley has never been in a dangerous, no win fight though.
Hatton's biggest domestic danger was Witter, a genuine world class banger who became a genuine world champion himself.
Audley's so called dangerous, no win fights have come against Sprott(never been any better than top 35 in the world)and Williams(got sparked everytime he has stepped up above domestic level bar the Tyson fight)
:oops:
Finn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5509
Joined: 07 May 2009, 15:56

Re: Warren on Audley

Post by Finn »

thepocketrocket wrote:You misread it, maybe due the the brackets, i was asking why Danny, Guinn and Sprott were dangerous!! Deliberatretly didnt mention Audleys name!!!

Well williams knocked out mike tyson and had a world title fight against vitali klitschko and holds the british heavy weight title, i'd say that makes him fairly dangerous.
thepocketrocket
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3283
Joined: 16 Jan 2003, 06:26

Re: Warren on Audley

Post by thepocketrocket »

Yes, and he lost to Julius Francis and Sinan Samil Sam...Tyson was shot and Vitali brutalised him.

Not slating Danny, but this isnt a dangerous match up if you are serious world class is it?
leforge
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7790
Joined: 04 Mar 2005, 12:44

Re: Warren on Audley

Post by leforge »

Audley could be Euro champ in few fights time!
thepocketrocket
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3283
Joined: 16 Jan 2003, 06:26

Re: Warren on Audley

Post by thepocketrocket »

Oh Come on, Mike went on to lose to Kevin Fckin Mcbride. this was a shell of the version that Lennox beat, and that was a pretty shite version(so sad to watch :cry: )

Danny loses to Sprott and Sinan Samil Sam yet sometimes beats people of their ilk...he isnt, and never was a world class contender!!

And anyway, thats good if you are an average European title contender, but Audley was 'on the road to champsville'! Danny and friends should have been a notch on the belt, not a no win, dangerous fight!

Audley fecked himself by having no balls when the going go tough, Mr Frank is 100% per cent right on this one!!!
jamesmcdonnell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 45235
Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11

Re: Warren on Audley

Post by jamesmcdonnell »

Ant Evans wrote:
thepocketrocket wrote:Yes, and he lost to Julius Francis and Sinan Samil Sam...Tyson was shot and Vitali brutalised him.

Not slating Danny, but this isnt a dangerous match up if you are serious world class is it?
Danny beat a very good Tyson, and took some thunderous punches before coming back for the win. And after a 4 year break Vitali came back in his late 30s and has beaten the hell out of everyone in the division. Danny did as well as many "world" champions such as Kerbie Hide.
As good as the Tyson win appeared, Danny himself admitted Tyson was a shell of his former self. It was impressive by Danny, because even a very shopworn Tyson was probably better than Danny was, but Danny wanted it more and walked through hellfire to get the win. I think the punishment Danny took that night probably hastended his decline, and Vitali put the finishing touches.

Much as I like Danny, he was never world class, despite occasionally giving fleeting glimpses of what it would be like if he were world class.
Boxingmad
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 670
Joined: 12 Jul 2004, 07:04

Re: Warren on Audley

Post by Boxingmad »

jamesmcdonnell wrote:
Ant Evans wrote:
thepocketrocket wrote:Yes, and he lost to Julius Francis and Sinan Samil Sam...Tyson was shot and Vitali brutalised him.

Not slating Danny, but this isnt a dangerous match up if you are serious world class is it?
Danny beat a very good Tyson, and took some thunderous punches before coming back for the win. And after a 4 year break Vitali came back in his late 30s and has beaten the hell out of everyone in the division. Danny did as well as many "world" champions such as Kerbie Hide.
As good as the Tyson win appeared, Danny himself admitted Tyson was a shell of his former self. It was impressive by Danny, because even a very shopworn Tyson was probably better than Danny was, but Danny wanted it more and walked through hellfire to get the win. I think the punishment Danny took that night probably hastended his decline, and Vitali put the finishing touches.

Much as I like Danny, he was never world class, despite occasionally giving fleeting glimpses of what it would be like if he were world class.
One thing i noticed about Tyson the night he faced Danny was his physique. He looked like he had trained for the fight and indeed gave Williams hell for the first round or so. Could you really see Audley, Sprott, McDermott et al getting through that first round? As you say, even a shopworn Tyson was still a cut above.
Boxingmad
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 670
Joined: 12 Jul 2004, 07:04

Re: Warren on Audley

Post by Boxingmad »

kingfinn wrote:
Boxingmad wrote:Allegedly was making sense there for once - what is Fraudley gonna do now? Even a work colleague of mine who watched on Friday says that he looks frightened when he fights!

He'll get into the domestic mix maybe, but I can see Chisora and McDermott beating him at this stage. I still haven't made up my mind on Tyson Fury yet.
oh well if your work colleague said so it must be true.
Lol I think my point was that it was so blatantly obvious to those watching even to casual fans like my fellow co-worker that Audley just doesn't have the stomach for it and should just stick to playing poker.
oliverfennell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5564
Joined: 15 Feb 2007, 06:37

Re: Warren on Audley

Post by oliverfennell »

thepocketrocket wrote:Oh Come on, Mike went on to lose to Kevin Fckin Mcbride.
Re-watch Tyson-Williams and Tyson-McBride. If Tyson was 40% of his full self for Williams, he was barely 40% of the Williams fight for McBride. The Tyson who fought Williams would have wiped out McBtide in 30 seconds, but 13 months later he had absolutely nothing left.
damianhucker1
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3071
Joined: 20 Sep 2008, 17:36

Re: Warren on Audley

Post by damianhucker1 »

oliverfennell wrote:
thepocketrocket wrote:Oh Come on, Mike went on to lose to Kevin Fckin Mcbride.
Re-watch Tyson-Williams and Tyson-McBride. If Tyson was 40% of his full self for Williams, he was barely 40% of the Williams fight for McBride. The Tyson who fought Williams would have wiped out McBtide in 30 seconds, but 13 months later he had absolutely nothing left.
completely agree .
for some reason lately tysons legacy seems to have gone from a potential best over to a nobody , strange how time alters perception
stujones
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 27508
Joined: 29 Aug 2003, 15:08

Re: Warren on Audley

Post by stujones »

Tyson always looked in shape, even when way over the top in weight... which he was vs Williams.
Spud
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Warren on Audley

Post by Spud »

Excellent news - all this hatred for Audley is good news for whoever promotes him next - it will sell tickets - he will be in the newspapers - boxing will be in the news and then us ardent fans can p*ss ourselves when he is sparked.

I am in an ironic sort of way delighted Audley is in the news because it means boxing is - lets hope he gets a couple of stiffs to box although I couldn't tolerate too many and it generates a bit of interest and then hopefully a british boxers comes along puts us fans out of our misery and knocks Audley out and then we can start the hype game whoever does the job on Audley. :TU:
stujones
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 27508
Joined: 29 Aug 2003, 15:08

Re: Warren on Audley

Post by stujones »

Spud wrote:Excellent news - all this hatred for Audley is good news for whoever promotes him next - it will sell tickets - he will be in the newspapers - boxing will be in the news and then us ardent fans can p*ss ourselves when he is sparked.

I am in an ironic sort of way delighted Audley is in the news because it means boxing is - lets hope he gets a couple of stiffs to box although I couldn't tolerate too many and it generates a bit of interest and then hopefully a british boxers comes along puts us fans out of our misery and knocks Audley out and then we can start the hype game whoever does the job on Audley. :TU:
Sadly, he doesn't have the tools to back up his talk a little. He lost to Michael Sprott... without meaning to be disrepectful we cannot do much of a hype job on him.... never going to be a world champion, Sprott.

Heavyweight devision is a mess.
fluxstuff
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 126
Joined: 16 Nov 2008, 16:31

Re: Warren on Audley

Post by fluxstuff »

Didn't Audley have a tantrum at Haye for not featuring him on one of his Hayemaker shows?

Then said the only way to sort it out was for Haye to fight him. That's right, an established champion fighting a guy that lost to Martin Rogan.
Post Reply