BoxRec

MrBoxingUK2 wrote:frank maloney. you have let down your fighters and the british boxing public

That's taking it a bit too far.

diggler wrote:what a farce Shi t matchmaking price and jefferies need to be matched a lot tougher

I know it's hard to defend that but it's really hard getting matches for Olympians. I did some work with a US Olympian and nobody would fight him.
You either have fighters who won't fight him because they know they're just there to get beat or those that would fight them but are a bit too much of a risk at such an early stage. Frank was obviously just trying to get someone in on the cheap and hope that they are as good as their record and can give them a few rounds.

jBacca wrote:

MrBoxingUK2 wrote:frank maloney. you have let down your fighters and the british boxing public

That's taking it a bit too far.

why is it?? price and jeffries have trained hard for this. to get shocking opponent's like this.

Im going for Broadhurst UD with about 8 rds to 4

neil hibbert wrote:power stopped edmonds i believe had him down 4 times!

Decent win for Martin
do u know what round???

Could people please not post results unless the thread has a spoiler tag? I'll start one. Please edit the comments above.

whatashambles wrote:

diggler wrote:what a farce Shi t matchmaking price and jefferies need to be matched a lot tougher

I know it's hard to defend that but it's really hard getting matches for Olympians. I did some work with a US Olympian and nobody would fight him.
You either have fighters who won't fight him because they know they're just there to get beat or those that would fight them but are a bit too much of a risk at such an early stage. Frank was obviously just trying to get someone in on the cheap and hope that they are as good as their record and can give them a few rounds.

I understand that but would it not be worthwhile paying a little extra so the fighters progress doesn't stagnite

round 1; 10-9 haskins

Does it really matter about Price's and Jeffries's quality of opponent at this stage?

Isn't it more important to keep them busy?

not really warmed up yet--- fair enough, it's 12 rounds.

Horse wrote:Does it really matter about Price's and Jeffries's quality of opponent at this stage?

Isn't it more important to keep them busy?

as a fan, I like to see contests that are not pointless one sided.

if you keep feeding them these type of oppnent theyll never be ready for oppnents who punch back

round 2; 10-9 haskins

round 3; 10-10

2-1 Haskins after 3.

Broadhurst waits on Haskins like he´s Roy Jones or something. Just throw and you´ll win. 1-1-1.

10-9 Haskins.. i have him 3-1 up.

This Maloney bashing is unfair and here's why. If this is his worst show of the year, u still get a good main event on paper, Power-Edmonds and Webb-Morby. i got banned by Wazza because i slated a show that, main event aside, the best fight on paper was Liam Walsh-John Baguley. Maloney generally puts on deep (more bouts than all his rivals) well-matched bills. 'others' save that for PPV

round 4; 10-9 haskins, just robbed the round

another dire Haskins fight at the moment

The most fight so far has come from Darke "that's one of the worst rounds of boxing I have ever seen". go on Ian!

Commentator- "thats one of the worst rounds of boxing I've ever seen...!!!"

dbflex wrote:This Maloney bashing is unfair and here's why. If this is his worst show of the year, u still get a good main event on paper, Power-Edmonds and Webb-Morby. i got banned by Wazza because i slated a show that, main event aside, the best fight on paper was Liam Walsh-John Baguley. Maloney generally puts on deep (more bouts than all his rivals) well-matched bills. 'others' save that for PPV

I agree there- some of the Waz Friday Fight Night shows have awfully poorly matched undercards.

Most do, in fact.

Right, am giving up on scoring this shite.

What a shit fight.