Posted: 15 Sep 2003, 20:19
Incidentally, how did you score that Leonard-Hagler fight, MW?
MW, you see an X on Bennie's post - I don't see that.bennie wrote:It's your good advice!! Where's Goz when I need him...MightyWarrior wrote:bennie wrote:Can someone confirm for me that they can see my avatar of Julio Cesar Chavez cracking Jose Luis Ramirez please.
I was just about to ask you, what the fukcs up with your avatar??! All we can see is - x - can you sort it out please bennie? Are you on the Stafford Ale again tonight?
I thought Leonard won it, Hagler fought the wrong fight by trying to outbox Sugar Ray. Should've steam rolled him like he did Hearns.bennie wrote:Incidentally, how did you score that Leonard-Hagler fight, MW?
Damn right. It's people's de-sensitization to the problem which contributes to it's general acceptance in boxing.Kilburn wrote:Can I just say BOLLEX to all this "I've seen more outrageous decisions than that" nonsense. So effing what?? Does that mean we shouldn't make a fuss about De La Hoya v Mosley II (which Oscar CLEARLY won) just because the likes of Foreman v Schultz were even worse?
C'mon. Those other fights have nothing to do with this. It was terrible scoring by all 3 judges on saturday night, end of story.
I'm just stating a fact, there's been a lot worse than that, and there's little point in making a "fuss" cause it amounts sweet FA in the end.Kilburn wrote:Can I just say BOLLEX to all this "I've seen more outrageous decisions than that" nonsense. So effing what?? Does that mean we shouldn't make a fuss about De La Hoya v Mosley II (which Oscar CLEARLY won) just because the likes of Foreman v Schultz were even worse?
C'mon. Those other fights have nothing to do with this. It was terrible scoring by all 3 judges on saturday night, end of story.
How you doing mate??Kilburn wrote:Mighty Warrior I was talking purely from a fans perspective, nothing that any of us decide to complain about on these message boards amounts to "sweet FA in the end". It's just discussion.
I agree though there doesn't seem any point in De La Hoya trying to have the result reversed or even made into a no contest. The judges made their decisions on the fight and everyone has to accept it.
Yes, Hagler fought a stupid fight. I could never fathom why until I read an article on Rich Rose, former Nevada State Athletic Commissioner. Rose said that Hagler's immense pride was jarred by someone coming out of three years retirement to take him on, even if that someone was Sugar Ray Leonard. Hagler wanted to humiliate Leonard as a result and actually tried to outbox the master boxer in an attempt to do so. The more I watch the tape, the more I agree with Rose. Hagler blew it.MightyWarrior wrote:I thought Leonard won it, Hagler fought the wrong fight by trying to outbox Sugar Ray. Should've steam rolled him like he did Hearns.bennie wrote:Incidentally, how did you score that Leonard-Hagler fight, MW?
Mr lightsoot I know you think Mosley won, better not even go there BUT don't you think some of these refs and judges are just a bit too old anyway? I mean who says you have to have been scoring fights for 80 years to be any good at it?lightsoot wrote:
How you doing mate??![]()
Makes a change for you to be rucking about scoring. That's usually my domain!!
Bennie - My memory of events is that Hagler went away almost immediately after the fight and never really came back other than to pack his bags for Milan. I thought the rematch was mooted for a while after but Hagler seemed intent on walking away from the sport for good?bennie wrote:Yes, Hagler fought a stupid fight. I could never fathom why until I read an article on Rich Rose, former Nevada State Athletic Commissioner. Rose said that Hagler's immense pride was jarred by someone coming out of three years retirement to take him on, even if that someone was Sugar Ray Leonard. Hagler wanted to humiliate Leonard as a result and actually tried to outbox the master boxer in an attempt to do so. The more I watch the tape, the more I agree with Rose. Hagler blew it.MightyWarrior wrote:I thought Leonard won it, Hagler fought the wrong fight by trying to outbox Sugar Ray. Should've steam rolled him like he did Hearns.bennie wrote:Incidentally, how did you score that Leonard-Hagler fight, MW?
It took him years to get over that decision of course. It's a shame Leonard didn't give him a rematch. Sugar Ray took on Lalonde, Hearns and Duran in the two-and-a-half years that followed his shock win - and still looked good. So the fact he refused to take on Hagler during that same period speaks for itself. Leonard was no fool. he knew he'd kidded Hagler out of it.
The scorecard of the fight can be found here:
http://www.sommet.net/wbc1/home/latest/ ... gi?ID=3557
Couldn't access that page bennie, comes up unavailable - Come to think of it, it might've been a Mexican judge who came up with all those even rounds - Jo Jo something??bennie wrote:Yes, Hagler fought a stupid fight. I could never fathom why until I read an article on Rich Rose, former Nevada State Athletic Commissioner. Rose said that Hagler's immense pride was jarred by someone coming out of three years retirement to take him on, even if that someone was Sugar Ray Leonard. Hagler wanted to humiliate Leonard as a result and actually tried to outbox the master boxer in an attempt to do so. The more I watch the tape, the more I agree with Rose. Hagler blew it.MightyWarrior wrote:I thought Leonard won it, Hagler fought the wrong fight by trying to outbox Sugar Ray. Should've steam rolled him like he did Hearns.bennie wrote:Incidentally, how did you score that Leonard-Hagler fight, MW?
It took him years to get over that decision of course. It's a shame Leonard didn't give him a rematch. Sugar Ray took on Lalonde, Hearns and Duran in the two-and-a-half years that followed his shock win - and still looked good. So the fact he refused to take on Hagler during that same period speaks for itself. Leonard was no fool. he knew he'd kidded Hagler out of it.
The scorecard of the fight can be found here:
http://www.sommet.net/wbc1/home/latest/ ... gi?ID=3557
Good points, MW. I believe Hagler could have also got a 15-rounder if he'd really pushed (as you know, the last 15-rounder took place a year later), but again gave way to Leonard's camp. You can understand why he wanted to humiliate the Sugar Man.MightyWarrior wrote:Couldn't access that page bennie, comes up unavailable - Come to think of it, it might've been a Mexican judge who came up with all those even rounds - Jo Jo something??bennie wrote:Yes, Hagler fought a stupid fight. I could never fathom why until I read an article on Rich Rose, former Nevada State Athletic Commissioner. Rose said that Hagler's immense pride was jarred by someone coming out of three years retirement to take him on, even if that someone was Sugar Ray Leonard. Hagler wanted to humiliate Leonard as a result and actually tried to outbox the master boxer in an attempt to do so. The more I watch the tape, the more I agree with Rose. Hagler blew it.MightyWarrior wrote: I thought Leonard won it, Hagler fought the wrong fight by trying to outbox Sugar Ray. Should've steam rolled him like he did Hearns.
It took him years to get over that decision of course. It's a shame Leonard didn't give him a rematch. Sugar Ray took on Lalonde, Hearns and Duran in the two-and-a-half years that followed his shock win - and still looked good. So the fact he refused to take on Hagler during that same period speaks for itself. Leonard was no fool. he knew he'd kidded Hagler out of it.
The scorecard of the fight can be found here:
http://www.sommet.net/wbc1/home/latest/ ... gi?ID=3557
Yes Leonard really conned Hagler that night - Marvin's managers came in for some stick too - for agreeing to every demand Ray made before the fight, all to their man's disadvantage - ie the large ring for one.
Then Marv made things worse by coming out orthodox(??) and getting outboxed in the early rounds.
At one point, he responded to Leonard's showmanship by raising his arms in the air during a round - something Hagler never did. Just added to the impression he was gettting sucked into Ray's type of fight..
Leonard was a master of psychological warfare ( though Duran was more than a match in those stakes for a younger Leonard ).
I don't think De La Hoya could've beaten him for instance.
Not sure about Roy Jones - do you think he'd have beaten Leonard, at middleweight for instance?