Page 2 of 2
Re: The Noob Thread
Posted: 18 Dec 2009, 23:19
by kevo
toppity wrote:HomicideHenry wrote:Nah, the Commish over ruled your dirty tricks, so I'm sticking with Thornton and Crumble. Next week Braddock is taking on Archie Moore (Sav agreed) and Burns will be taking on Tommy Gibbons (toppity agreed), etc.
You'll have to wait til week four Gene 'Looney' Tunney to get his chance
I did not agreee as I do not have Gibbons in my stable.
Noob Move.
HomicideHenry is constantly getting trainers/fighter names mixed up. Sort it out Noob!
Re: The Noob Thread
Posted: 18 Dec 2009, 23:45
by kevo
Boxbuzz and HomicideHenry matching fighters outside of the Arrange a Fight Thread.
Noob Move? Aye and aye
Re: The Noob Thread
Posted: 22 Dec 2009, 11:06
by kevo
The End wrote:Saad Muhammad calls out Michael Moorer
Harold Johnson calls out Virgil Hill
Posted in the 'Fight Card 1 Results' Thread
Re: The Noob Thread
Posted: 22 Dec 2009, 17:13
by Marlin
From the arrange fight thread:
jBacca wrote:Grimm wrote:I'm callin out slow ass Gavilan for a stable war.
Stable war?
kevo, I'm calling noob move. This is at least the second time your boy hasn't been able to grasp the concept of a stable war.
Last season SAV and I took about 23 posts trying to explain it to him...
Re: The Noob Thread
Posted: 22 Dec 2009, 17:21
by jBacca
Marlin wrote:From the arrange fight thread:
jBacca wrote:Grimm wrote:I'm callin out slow ass Gavilan for a stable war.
Stable war?
kevo, I'm calling noob move. This is at least the second time your boy hasn't been able to grasp the concept of a stable war.
Last season SAV and I took about 23 posts trying to explain it to him...
Kevo.
Marlin is clearly oblivious to the fact i'm asking for a stable war, and not what one is. Only adamjnoob might pose such a question if it did exist.
SO
I hereby nominate Marlin.
Re: The Noob Thread
Posted: 22 Dec 2009, 17:24
by Marlin
Nice attempt at a get out jbacnoob... I have history on my side though.
Re: The Noob Thread
Posted: 22 Dec 2009, 23:13
by BoxBuzz
We strongly suggest that people retract and rescind any and all noob characterizations toward one another, as it is both unkind and demeaning. I suggest an accentuating of the positive, and an eliminating of the negative with full conscious intent. Never, never, never, give in to anything other than a positive and honorable course of action.
Re: The Noob Thread
Posted: 23 Dec 2009, 00:14
by SAV
aye to the boxbuzz and HH..
the marlin/jbacca looks to be a misunderstanding. no vote yet.
Re: The Noob Thread
Posted: 23 Dec 2009, 12:27
by kevo
Marlin - It seems pretty clear that Bacca is offering Grimm a stable war. Not a noob move
jBacca - False accusations of noobery do not warrant punishment. Not a noob move.
Re: The Noob Thread
Posted: 23 Dec 2009, 17:26
by Smally Big Plums
kevo wrote:Marlin - It seems pretty clear that Bacca is offering Grimm a stable war. Not a noob move
jBacca - False accusations of noobery do not warrant punishment. Not a noob move.
I see you're familiar with the noob codes of practice.
Re: The Noob Thread
Posted: 24 Dec 2009, 02:17
by Grimm
kevo wrote:Marlin - It seems pretty clear that Bacca is offering Grimm a stable war. Not a noob move
jBacca - False accusations of noobery do not warrant punishment. Not a noob move.
noob move - defending a noob move
Re: The Noob Thread
Posted: 24 Dec 2009, 08:26
by kevo
Errr......no.
Re: The Noob Thread
Posted: 24 Dec 2009, 08:27
by Adamj1987
kevo wrote:Errr......no.
i must agree with kevo
Re: The Noob Thread
Posted: 24 Dec 2009, 14:46
by SAV
Grimm wrote:kevo wrote:Marlin - It seems pretty clear that Bacca is offering Grimm a stable war. Not a noob move
jBacca - False accusations of noobery do not warrant punishment. Not a noob move.
noob move - defending a noob move
this puts you on thin ice for another noob move grimm
Re: The Noob Thread
Posted: 24 Dec 2009, 14:49
by kevo
Grimm is a noob move.