Page 2 of 3
Re: Mundine Vs Woods
Posted: 12 Jan 2010, 00:47
by smelodies
adamheight wrote:smelodies wrote:Mundine is beatable, look at medleys face after the fight, hardly a mark so a lot must have landed on the gloves, medley caught him almost every time he opened up, if his work rate was 30% better he could have won that fight, the stupid basted wouldn't let his hands go for some reason.
Mundine is like kessler, he stands upright.
smelodies, why dont you go and have a little chat with yourself? what a proposterous thing to say
I'm talking about his defence, actually it is probably a bit better than kesslers.
Re: Mundine Vs Woods
Posted: 12 Jan 2010, 00:49
by Sweet P
adamheight wrote:smelodies wrote:Mundine is beatable, look at medleys face after the fight, hardly a mark so a lot must have landed on the gloves, medley caught him almost every time he opened up, if his work rate was 30% better he could have won that fight, the stupid basted wouldn't let his hands go for some reason.
Mundine is like kessler, he stands upright.
smelodies, why dont you go and have a little chat with yourself? what a proposterous thing to say
I agree Adam, They are like chalk and cheese. Total opposites in there fighting Styles. Kessler is a straight up right European fighter using a good jab and straight right.
Re: Mundine Vs Woods
Posted: 12 Jan 2010, 00:53
by Sweet P
smelodies wrote:adamheight wrote:smelodies wrote:Mundine is beatable, look at medleys face after the fight, hardly a mark so a lot must have landed on the gloves, medley caught him almost every time he opened up, if his work rate was 30% better he could have won that fight, the stupid basted wouldn't let his hands go for some reason.
Mundine is like kessler, he stands upright.
smelodies, why dont you go and have a little chat with yourself? what a proposterous thing to say
I'm talking about his defence, actually it is probably a bit better than kesslers.
Your digging yourself in deeper now
Mundine uses a defencive style similar to RJJ and Toney. Using shoulder rolls and relieing on his speed to aviod or lesson punches. Kessler uses an orthodox defence. Totally diffrent
Re: Mundine Vs Woods
Posted: 12 Jan 2010, 00:58
by smelodies
ben k wrote:smelodies wrote:adamheight wrote:
smelodies, why dont you go and have a little chat with yourself? what a proposterous thing to say
I'm talking about his defence, actually it is probably a bit better than kesslers.
Your digging yourself in deeper now
Mundine uses a defencive style similar to RJJ and Toney. Using shoulder rolls and relieing on his speed to aviod or lesson punches. Kessler uses an orthodox defence. Totally diffrent
Kessler uses the shoulder a fair bit, his defence is closer to kesslers than it is to andre wards, kessler couldn't land a punch on ward cause the angles and his footwork
If he can build on what he is doing now i give woods a chance of beating mundine because he uses angles and he is fast and stong and he uses spoiling tactics.
I'm sure he said yesterday that he went to America to prepare for kariz, if he keeps going there and getting good sparring and keeps learning new tricks and increases the work rate then he has a chance of beating mundine.
I hope woods can beat him, if no one in australia beats him then when he is retired he will boast that he is better than everyone, no one here could beat him, fighters and their egos, they are anoying at times ain't they

, i like watching them perform but i don't like a lot of their personalities.
Re: Mundine Vs Woods
Posted: 12 Jan 2010, 01:28
by RAB2204
I dont think this fight should happen at all. Wood is nowhere in the same league as mundine i think they should make a contract where wood has to win his next 5 or 6 fights or get his record up to sumthing like 15-1 whilst choc should venture overseas(i hope)...& then fight at the start of 2011 so Garth has more experience .

Re: Mundine Vs Woods
Posted: 12 Jan 2010, 01:31
by smelodies
RAB2204 wrote:I dont think this fight should happen at all. Wood is nowhere in the same league as mundine i think they should make a contract where wood has to win his next 5 or 6 fights or get his record up to sumthing like 15-1 whilst choc should venture overseas(i hope)...& then fight at the start of 2011 so Garth has more experience .

But he can improve, i watched his fight with oganov and his fight last night, it looked like he has improved
Re: Mundine Vs Woods
Posted: 12 Jan 2010, 01:42
by caveman
he is a raw novice, has done well, gunna be interesting to watch wat he does next
Re: Mundine Vs Woods
Posted: 12 Jan 2010, 04:41
by 'Frilla
Marlin wrote:You're in an Aussie forum, we don't give three shits about Clinton Woods. It is clear to us that we're talking about Australian, Garth.
And if you're not down with that, I've got two words for ya...
Suck it!!!!!!!!!!!!
Hornswoggle
Re: Mundine Vs Woods
Posted: 12 Jan 2010, 05:14
by Liver Crusher
Mundine will chew Garth Wood and spit him out!! The only Aussie fighter capable of beating Mundine is Geale!

Re: Mundine Vs Woods
Posted: 12 Jan 2010, 05:40
by 'Frilla
Liver Crusher wrote:Mundine will chew Garth Wood and spit him out!! The only Aussie fighter capable of beating Mundine is Geale!

Where have u been mate, havnt seen u on here for a while,
No one admires Geale more than u Mr LiverCrusher

Re: Mundine Vs Woods
Posted: 12 Jan 2010, 05:40
by 'Frilla
harshfriller wrote:Liver Crusher wrote:Mundine will chew Garth Wood and spit him out!! The only Aussie fighter capable of beating Mundine is Geale!

Where have u been mate, havnt seen u on here for a while,
No one admires Geale more than u Mr LiverCrusher

But i do agree with ur hypothesis

Re: Mundine Vs Woods
Posted: 12 Jan 2010, 05:47
by Hounddawg
Liver Crusher wrote:Mundine will chew Garth Wood and spit him out!! The only Aussie fighter capable of beating Mundine is Geale!

Whats Geale doing, any news on a scheduled fight?
Re: Mundine Vs Woods
Posted: 12 Jan 2010, 06:33
by smelodies
I think medley has the speed and skills to beat him but he chose not to let his hands go even though he had success when he did let them go.
Re: Mundine Vs Woods
Posted: 12 Jan 2010, 07:25
by JDC
ra2006 wrote:JDC wrote:Marlin wrote:At least I don't go into the British forum to talk trash.
We're sick of you pome's coming in here with nothing constructive to add.
Talk trash. lol
Seriously WTF - Pot Kettle, nuff said
Ive added more constructive post in my 400 than you have in 80,000. Your a very sad individual indeed
Before you get even more constructive, you would be wise to work on your grammer first.

My grammar lmao. You start a sentence with ''before'' and end it with ''first.'' Very good use of language there
Re: Mundine Vs Woods
Posted: 12 Jan 2010, 07:36
by JDC
toppity wrote:JDC wrote:Marlin wrote:At least I don't go into the British forum to talk trash.
We're sick of you pome's coming in here with nothing constructive to add.
Talk trash. lol
Seriously WTF - Pot Kettle, nuff said
Ive added more constructive post in my 400 than you have in 80,000. Your a very sad individual indeed
why the edit? Anyway, I'm sorry that you feel alienated. But that my friend, is life. It's no different anywhere else on the board. I suggest you go forth and find out.....no need to report back though.
I edited because I said I had 300 posts then noticed it was 400. Thats how much significance they have to me. I expect this is hard for you to grasp as you count every single post on your way to your next big target.
Now why would I feel alienated from that?
I have better things to do than post whore. Do you see your number of post as an extension of yourself? Are you proud of such a great achievement?
Re: Mundine Vs Woods
Posted: 12 Jan 2010, 08:52
by ra2006
JDC wrote:ra2006 wrote:JDC wrote:
Talk trash. lol
Seriously WTF - Pot Kettle, nuff said
Ive added more constructive post in my 400 than you have in 80,000. Your a very sad individual indeed
Before you get even more constructive, you would be wise to work on your grammer first.

My grammar lmao. You start a sentence with ''before'' and end it with ''first.'' Very good use of language there
It is good to see that you are at least making an effort with grammer and trying to improve it by analysis of the written form. But the way, you finish a sentance with a full stop.
Re: Mundine Vs Woods
Posted: 12 Jan 2010, 17:32
by Collins2000
Marlin wrote:At least I don't go into the British forum to talk trash.
We're sick of you pome's coming in here with nothing constructive to add.
Too insular, mate.
Re: Mundine Vs Woods
Posted: 12 Jan 2010, 18:54
by foxdog1923
Mundine or Woods?...
I'm going for Mundine, I like Garth but in the final he didnt fight the way he normally does. I guess he had to stick to his winning fight plan which made him the contender.
However I dont think that will work against Mundine.
Re: Mundine Vs Woods
Posted: 12 Jan 2010, 19:02
by toppity
JDC wrote:toppity wrote:JDC wrote:
Talk trash. lol
Seriously WTF - Pot Kettle, nuff said
Ive added more constructive post in my 400 than you have in 80,000. Your a very sad individual indeed
why the edit? Anyway, I'm sorry that you feel alienated. But that my friend, is life. It's no different anywhere else on the board. I suggest you go forth and find out.....no need to report back though.
I edited because I said I had 300 posts then noticed it was 400. Thats how much significance they have to me. I expect this is hard for you to grasp as you count every single post on your way to your next big target.
Now why would I feel alienated from that?
I have better things to do than post whore. Do you see your number of post as an extension of yourself? Are you proud of such a great achievement?
Thanks for the report. In future I would prefer that you followed instructions better though.
As far as my post count goes.....well yes, you've got me. It's a bit like small blokes syndrome. I also have a huge car so I feel better about myself.
I am indeed proud of my posting achievments. As my numbers go up, so to do my man points. I constantly think about posting, and very little else to be honest. One day, with heaps of practice, I hope to be able to go onto forums and insult people as well as you do.
Re: Mundine Vs Woods
Posted: 12 Jan 2010, 19:08
by Tinnie
Lets face it Mundine/Woods offers no surprises.
The real question is what washed league star is Mundine gonna recruit for his undercard this time?
....Martin Bella?
....Geoff Toovey?
.....in all seriousness i wouldnt be surprised if he pulls Big Willie out of his a$$ (no pun intended), i think he still hasnt found a club yet.
Mundine knows he cant attract an audience alone anymore........theres gonna be someone
Re: Mundine Vs Woods
Posted: 12 Jan 2010, 19:15
by JDC
ra2006 wrote:
But the way, you finish a sentance with a full stop.
But the way.
![[icon_shame.gif] :shame:](./images/smilies/icon_shame.gif)
That great English phrase. YOUR LANGUAGE SKILLS ARE SHOCKING.
Why start an argument claiming superiority in a subject which you are, at best, lacking?
By the way, I really don't care about unimportant things like this. However,I do find it highly amusing when someone with poor language skills attacks a posters language skills.
You have made two posts, each with errors, trying to discredit me on the basis of my language and grammar. You have proven that you are in no position to be critical.
Re: Mundine Vs Woods
Posted: 12 Jan 2010, 19:18
by JDC
toppity wrote:
Thanks for the report. In future I would prefer that you followed instructions better though.
Sorry, but I wont be bullied and keel over because of you post count. If you don't want to be responded to then don't attack me
Re: Mundine Vs Woods
Posted: 12 Jan 2010, 19:19
by Marlin
Good thing you keep coming back, you are adding so much to the forum by telling everyone how little they add to the forum

Re: Mundine Vs Woods
Posted: 12 Jan 2010, 19:25
by JDC
Marlin wrote:Good thing you keep coming back, you are adding so much to the forum by telling everyone how little they add to the forum

I'm enjoying it

Re: Mundine Vs Woods
Posted: 12 Jan 2010, 19:26
by toppity
JDC wrote:Marlin wrote:Good thing you keep coming back, you are adding so much to the forum by telling everyone how little they add to the forum

I'm enjoying it

see, we do add something afterall.