milmascaras1 wrote:saad,
damn, you surprised me! i thought you were one of those pacquiao weenie huggers!
Offended!? You're kidding, right? I'm not offended. I'm embarrassed by how childish you are.milmascaras1 wrote:irene,
apparently you can't take a little ribbing you little puss face! and for your info, that 240 you're referring to is all muscle, baby! jesus, it seems like everything "offends" your little ass. what do you want me to do, put a little sugar on my threads from now on so you won't feel so threatened? and as far as that jiu-jitsu expert i was kidding about, don't worry. i'm not an expert at jiu-jitsu but i do hold a master's degree in giving your little royal aussie ass a nice little american beatdown! now, how's that for a comeback. AUSSIE AUSSIE OY OY!
Marquez would beat Chavez too, feel free to cry some more about it. Julio would probably last the distance against Manny, but you can never discount Chavez quitting.milmascaras1 wrote:saad,
pacroids probably would anniliate chavez, steroids to boot! listen mijo, pacquiao, winning all those ABC titles couldn't carry chavez' jackstrap even if you loaned him your quail eggs. God forbid if chavez was fighting now in his prime! pacquiao would run from him but even faster than he ran from an old marquez!!!
I think Chavez would have beaten Marqez. As far as quitting goes I used to think Chavez would be the last man to quit in the ring, that is until the second Randall fight. Chavez quitting against Manny? I guess it could happen.SaadOffTheDeck wrote:milmascaras1 wrote:saad,
Marquez would beat Chavez too, feel free to cry some more about it. Julio would probably last the distance against Manny, but you can never discount Chavez quitting.
It was sickening the way they stole Randalls title, an absolute travesty.SaadOffTheDeck wrote:Marquez/Chavez would be a great fight, the Randall rematch was one of the most blatantly corrupt moments I've ever witnessed. Even worse than the Whitaker & taylor robberies.
My job as a moderator is to do with keeping the forum clean (merging topics, and so on) and making sure people abide by the rules. That doesn't stop me from having an opinion or pointing out facts.milmascaras1 wrote:Oh come on asterix, don't tell me you're feelings are hurt as well that i'm not all over pacquiao's nuts!. is it a crime that i don't like pacquiao and nuthug his every move? does everyone have to like him or they'll be considered a hater? and you act as if i'm the only fan here who does not like pacquiao. listen, i respect him as a human being and as a great fighter but the guy has gotten too much of a free ride by fighting nothing but old, washed up, not to mention cherrypicking opponents. that, you cannot deny. is it a crime that i don't consider him to be as great as you make him out to be? come on now, as a moderator isn't it your job to be subjective?
You don't see it because it is all behind closed doors. You don't get to know when someone has been punished.milmascaras1 wrote:asterix,
look, the other day you sent me a warning because i had used some foul language. funny but i don't see you doing the same thing to other forumers using the same type of language? is it because i have negative things to say about your beloved pacquiao? look, i respect the guy but i'm in no way manloving him like many of these forumers do. think about it, what would this forum look like if everyone uncontrollably gave mad manlove to pacquiao without any opposite point of views? hmmm!!!
It's not the language, it's the act. If you can't currently differentiate then I'm sure there are websites you can learn from.Asterix wrote:And you weren't warned for foul language, you were warned for insulting another poster > http://boxrec.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p ... 2#p2287642
I just don't get how any boxing enthusiest could hate a fighter whom they have never met, whether it be Delahoya, Mosley, Mayweather, Jones Jr, Pacquiao or almost any one of the athletes who train their guts out and risk their lives to entertain us. It is perverse. To constantly ridicule, accuse and generally express irrational one eyed hatred towards some one whom has not done any one any harm and who you've never met is small.milmascaras1 wrote:Oh come on asterix, don't tell me you're feelings are hurt as well that i'm not all over pacquiao's nuts!. is it a crime that i don't like pacquiao and nuthug his every move? does everyone have to like him or they'll be considered a hater? and you act as if i'm the only fan here who does not like pacquiao. listen, i respect him as a human being and as a great fighter but the guy has gotten too much of a free ride by fighting nothing but old, washed up, not to mention cherrypicking opponents. that, you cannot deny. is it a crime that i don't consider him to be as great as you make him out to be? come on now, as a moderator isn't it your job to be subjective?
It was just a prayer for some common decency but not surprisingly it didn't register with you.milmascaras1 wrote:dberry,
okay, i'm a great big fan of pacquiao! HAPPY?
240lbs & not an ounce of brain cell in the entire body.dberry wrote:I just don't get how any boxing enthusiest could hate a fighter whom they have never met, whether it be Delahoya, Mosley, Mayweather, Jones Jr, Pacquiao or almost any one of the athletes who train their guts out and risk their lives to entertain us. It is perverse. To constantly ridicule, accuse and generally express one eyed hatred towards some one whom has not done any one any harm and who you've never met is small.milmascaras1 wrote:Oh come on asterix, don't tell me you're feelings are hurt as well that i'm not all over pacquiao's nuts!. is it a crime that i don't like pacquiao and nuthug his every move? does everyone have to like him or they'll be considered a hater? and you act as if i'm the only fan here who does not like pacquiao. listen, i respect him as a human being and as a great fighter but the guy has gotten too much of a free ride by fighting nothing but old, washed up, not to mention cherrypicking opponents. that, you cannot deny. is it a crime that i don't consider him to be as great as you make him out to be? come on now, as a moderator isn't it your job to be subjective?
Mate, in the Pacquiao v Tszyu thread, you spoke eloquently, you used great knowlage and creditable reason debating your oppinion, you made rational, unbiased arguements and brought up a couple of points that I hadn't thought of. I respected what you said.milmascaras1 wrote:dberry,
okay, i'm a great big fan of pacquiao! HAPPY?
