BoxRec

milmascaras1 wrote:saad,

damn, you surprised me! i thought you were one of those pacquiao weenie huggers!

Thinking isn't your strong suit. And you can just quote a post as opposed to typing a name for every post you make. But if you must, you should call me Mr. Muhammad.

I hate Pac, but he is truly a great fighter. He would mutilate Chavez.

"Thinking isn't your strong suit..." - Saad



Maybe if we all repeat it in unison long enough, he'll catch on. 240lbs of muscle, baby!

saad,

pacroids probably would anniliate chavez, steroids to boot! listen mijo, pacquiao, winning all those ABC titles couldn't carry chavez' jackstrap even if you loaned him your quail eggs. God forbid if chavez was fighting now in his prime! pacquiao would run from him but even faster than he ran from an old marquez!!!

milmascaras1 wrote:irene,

apparently you can't take a little ribbing you little puss face! and for your info, that 240 you're referring to is all muscle, baby! jesus, it seems like everything "offends" your little ass. what do you want me to do, put a little sugar on my threads from now on so you won't feel so threatened? and as far as that jiu-jitsu expert i was kidding about, don't worry. i'm not an expert at jiu-jitsu but i do hold a master's degree in giving your little royal aussie ass a nice little american beatdown! now, how's that for a comeback. AUSSIE AUSSIE OY OY!

Offended!? You're kidding, right? I'm not offended. I'm embarrassed by how childish you are.

Enough to the point where I think you're welcome to the last word. I'm putting you on Ignore. You're just not worth any of our time here at BOTP. Go ahead & make a little jibe about wet panties or whatever half-assed remark you can come up with --- it'll be the last, as far as I'm concerned

milmascaras1 wrote:saad,

pacroids probably would anniliate chavez, steroids to boot! listen mijo, pacquiao, winning all those ABC titles couldn't carry chavez' jackstrap even if you loaned him your quail eggs. God forbid if chavez was fighting now in his prime! pacquiao would run from him but even faster than he ran from an old marquez!!!

Marquez would beat Chavez too, feel free to cry some more about it. Julio would probably last the distance against Manny, but you can never discount Chavez quitting.

SaadOffTheDeck wrote:

milmascaras1 wrote:saad,
Marquez would beat Chavez too, feel free to cry some more about it. Julio would probably last the distance against Manny, but you can never discount Chavez quitting.

I think Chavez would have beaten Marqez. As far as quitting goes I used to think Chavez would be the last man to quit in the ring, that is until the second Randall fight. Chavez quitting against Manny? I guess it could happen.

Marquez/Chavez would be a great fight, the Randall rematch was one of the most blatantly corrupt moments I've ever witnessed. Even worse than the Whitaker & taylor robberies.

Duran hits Pacquiao in the bollocks in round 13, but the referee does not see it & Pacquiao is fucked!

Duran KO!

SaadOffTheDeck wrote:Marquez/Chavez would be a great fight, the Randall rematch was one of the most blatantly corrupt moments I've ever witnessed. Even worse than the Whitaker & taylor robberies.

It was sickening the way they stole Randalls title, an absolute travesty.

Just in case the people in this forum don't know milmascaras1, he's constantly posting negatively about Manny Pacquiao. Take what he says with a pinch of salt.

Oh come on asterix, don't tell me you're feelings are hurt as well that i'm not all over pacquiao's nuts!. is it a crime that i don't like pacquiao and nuthug his every move? does everyone have to like him or they'll be considered a hater? and you act as if i'm the only fan here who does not like pacquiao. listen, i respect him as a human being and as a great fighter but the guy has gotten too much of a free ride by fighting nothing but old, washed up, not to mention cherrypicking opponents. that, you cannot deny. is it a crime that i don't consider him to be as great as you make him out to be? come on now, as a moderator isn't it your job to be subjective?

milmascaras1 wrote:Oh come on asterix, don't tell me you're feelings are hurt as well that i'm not all over pacquiao's nuts!. is it a crime that i don't like pacquiao and nuthug his every move? does everyone have to like him or they'll be considered a hater? and you act as if i'm the only fan here who does not like pacquiao. listen, i respect him as a human being and as a great fighter but the guy has gotten too much of a free ride by fighting nothing but old, washed up, not to mention cherrypicking opponents. that, you cannot deny. is it a crime that i don't consider him to be as great as you make him out to be? come on now, as a moderator isn't it your job to be subjective?

My job as a moderator is to do with keeping the forum clean (merging topics, and so on) and making sure people abide by the rules. That doesn't stop me from having an opinion or pointing out facts.

I prefer boxing fans to attempt to speak from a neutral stand point. You obviously don't. It's nothing to with so called "nuthuggery".

asterix,

look, the other day you sent me a warning because i had used some foul language. funny but i don't see you doing the same thing to other forumers using the same type of language? is it because i have negative things to say about your beloved pacquiao? look, i respect the guy but i'm in no way manloving him like many of these forumers do. think about it, what would this forum look like if everyone uncontrollably gave mad manlove to pacquiao without any opposite point of views? hmmm!!!

milmascaras1 wrote:asterix,

look, the other day you sent me a warning because i had used some foul language. funny but i don't see you doing the same thing to other forumers using the same type of language? is it because i have negative things to say about your beloved pacquiao? look, i respect the guy but i'm in no way manloving him like many of these forumers do. think about it, what would this forum look like if everyone uncontrollably gave mad manlove to pacquiao without any opposite point of views? hmmm!!!

You don't see it because it is all behind closed doors. You don't get to know when someone has been punished.

If you ever see someone breaking the rules, please report the post(s).

And you weren't warned for foul language, you were warned for insulting another poster > http://boxrec.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p ... 2#p2287642

okay asterix, can you give me a list of the "insulting" words i can't use on these board? wait a minute, didn't saad, and irene insult me as well? or is this just a one way street where, because i don't like pacquiao very much, i get blamed for insulting others? if you can provide me with a list of "insulting" words i can no longer use then i will abide by your rules but i hope you apply these same rules to others as well!!!

Read my post:

Asterix wrote:And you weren't warned for foul language, you were warned for insulting another poster > http://boxrec.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p ... 2#p2287642

It's not the language, it's the act. If you can't currently differentiate then I'm sure there are websites you can learn from.

You expect too much from him, Asterix. He just asked you, as a Moderator, to be, "subjective," no?

Differentiating between anything isn't his strong suite. Much like thinking isn't, as Saad has already endeavoured to explain to him. That's why he's the latest edition to my Ignore List.

there are many "acts" when you're insulting somebody. can you expound on you meaning of "the act"? i mean, you seem to have these blinders on when differentating between "acts"! what's the big difference between me insulting little irene/saad and them insulting me? isn't insulting, insulting no matter how you say it? is it that my insulting was a little bit more insulting than their insulting was to me? can you please explain mr. moderator?

Duran better defense couple with his better offensive arsenal win this one. Pac will have his moments, but its not going to be enough. Duran by a clear UD.

milmascaras1 wrote:Oh come on asterix, don't tell me you're feelings are hurt as well that i'm not all over pacquiao's nuts!. is it a crime that i don't like pacquiao and nuthug his every move? does everyone have to like him or they'll be considered a hater? and you act as if i'm the only fan here who does not like pacquiao. listen, i respect him as a human being and as a great fighter but the guy has gotten too much of a free ride by fighting nothing but old, washed up, not to mention cherrypicking opponents. that, you cannot deny. is it a crime that i don't consider him to be as great as you make him out to be? come on now, as a moderator isn't it your job to be subjective?

I just don't get how any boxing enthusiest could hate a fighter whom they have never met, whether it be Delahoya, Mosley, Mayweather, Jones Jr, Pacquiao or almost any one of the athletes who train their guts out and risk their lives to entertain us. It is perverse. To constantly ridicule, accuse and generally express irrational one eyed hatred towards some one whom has not done any one any harm and who you've never met is small.

dberry,

okay, i'm a great big fan of pacquiao! HAPPY?

milmascaras1 wrote:dberry,

okay, i'm a great big fan of pacquiao! HAPPY?

It was just a prayer for some common decency but not surprisingly it didn't register with you.

hhaehre,

wtf are you talking about, common decency? wtf am i supposed to do, join into the pacquiao nuthuggery club? some of you people are just little whiners who seem to get all butthurt if someone criticizes your favorite fighters. oooooh, i know, this has got to be some flamin' liberal site where we're supposed to give ALL boxers positive critics! sorry buddy but where i come from (u.s.a.), we speak our mind and if the rest of the world doesn't like it, too bad! besides, who else matters other than the greatest country on this earth. sorry aussies and brits!!!

dberry wrote:

milmascaras1 wrote:Oh come on asterix, don't tell me you're feelings are hurt as well that i'm not all over pacquiao's nuts!. is it a crime that i don't like pacquiao and nuthug his every move? does everyone have to like him or they'll be considered a hater? and you act as if i'm the only fan here who does not like pacquiao. listen, i respect him as a human being and as a great fighter but the guy has gotten too much of a free ride by fighting nothing but old, washed up, not to mention cherrypicking opponents. that, you cannot deny. is it a crime that i don't consider him to be as great as you make him out to be? come on now, as a moderator isn't it your job to be subjective?

I just don't get how any boxing enthusiest could hate a fighter whom they have never met, whether it be Delahoya, Mosley, Mayweather, Jones Jr, Pacquiao or almost any one of the athletes who train their guts out and risk their lives to entertain us. It is perverse. To constantly ridicule, accuse and generally express one eyed hatred towards some one whom has not done any one any harm and who you've never met is small.

240lbs & not an ounce of brain cell in the entire body.

milmascaras1 wrote:dberry,

okay, i'm a great big fan of pacquiao! HAPPY?

Mate, in the Pacquiao v Tszyu thread, you spoke eloquently, you used great knowlage and creditable reason debating your oppinion, you made rational, unbiased arguements and brought up a couple of points that I hadn't thought of. I respected what you said.

I couldn't give two fvcks if you wheren't a Pacquiao fan. I just don't see the need to hate any fighter, particularly some one you don't know, and insult their fans. Especially when you show an objective, knowlagable veiw of boxing on some threads and then on others, this.