Page 2 of 2
Re: Lightheavy 20's vs 40's
Posted: 28 Mar 2010, 19:20
by Goodnight, Irene
dempseyfire wrote:Even though I view Charles as the greater fighter I actually have to go with Tunney in a head to head. I think Tunney was able to stick to a disciplined fight plan better than Ezzard and that would prove the difference in a very even matchup. Wish there was more footage of Charles though in his 175 prime.
Don't know if I'll ever see someone give him a, "10% chance" against Charles again if I live to be 100. That is just obscene.
Re: Lightheavy 20's vs 40's
Posted: 29 Mar 2010, 06:26
by Panzerfaust
For me , the Charles-Tunney fight would be a coin toss . I see it as wide open . I think Charles would handle Greb pretty well, just as Tunney did in some of their later encounters.
Greb vs Moore, does Greb outwork Moore or Moore land the ko?
Re: Lightheavy 20's vs 40's
Posted: 29 Mar 2010, 13:19
by Ambling Alp
I think Greb would probably win a decision the first time they would have fought. However, Moore would probably adjust and win in subsequent meetings.