BoxRec

bigped wrote:CRAIG MCEWAN

seems fairly even 30% each hopefully the fight gets made

2 words - James De Gale. Or ist that 3?

Seriously, he's not the best at the moment but you wait and see. Chunky is going to the very top. Just like A-Force...

MrBoxingUK2 wrote:

bigped wrote:CRAIG MCEWAN

#

did i miss a joke? lol ask macklin how the sparring with craig has been going?

Moore would be really strong up at middleweight, Barker looks a quality fighter but I just think Matt Macklin is in the form of his life at the moment and is the best in Europe.

Barker!!!!

demolitiondaley wrote:

danh wrote:barker the better middleweight of the bunch, moore wont win a world title at middleweight he isnt good enough at midd, macklin will also beat him if they ever box again.

How do you know how good or bad Jamie is going to be at middle? I think the weight will suit him better. I think he will beat Macklin for the European belt and he will definately go on to fight for a world title.

middleweight division is a harder division with the likes of pavlik, paul williams, winky wright,slyvester and felix sturm thats the top 5 and they all hold the 4 major belts can you honestly say that jamie could beat any of them i dont think he can, and i think macklin will beat jamie cause macklin has improved a million miles since the last thought in 2006, macklin just got his tactics wrong in there fight trying to bang jamie out and he just ran out of gas completley and i dont think he will make the same mistake again, but who knows?

danh wrote:

demolitiondaley wrote:

danh wrote:barker the better middleweight of the bunch, moore wont win a world title at middleweight he isnt good enough at midd, macklin will also beat him if they ever box again.

How do you know how good or bad Jamie is going to be at middle? I think the weight will suit him better. I think he will beat Macklin for the European belt and he will definately go on to fight for a world title.

middleweight division is a harder division with the likes of pavlik, paul williams, winky wright,slyvester and felix sturm thats the top 5 and they all hold the 4 major belts can you honestly say that jamie could beat any of them i dont think he can, and i think macklin will beat jamie cause macklin has improved a million miles since the last thought in 2006, macklin just got his tactics wrong in there fight trying to bang jamie out and he just ran out of gas completley and i dont think he will make the same mistake again, but who knows?

When your body is not struggling to make weight it will perform better then when tired from being weight drained etc, Jamie has struggled to make lightmiddle for a long time which was not a secret, he has also been improving his strength for a few years now so im sure he will be a handful for any middle around as he will be feeling good and reacting sharp he also has a better boxing brain than people realise............Martin is a very strong middle too the guy is like a brick wall shoulders like boulders and is improving massively and soon to be the new....................when he gets a shot at a title!!!

BARKERRRRRR

bigped wrote:

MrBoxingUK2 wrote:

bigped wrote:CRAIG MCEWAN

#

did i miss a joke? lol ask macklin how the sparring with craig has been going?

no mate i will ask darnell boone the guy that mcewan won a split decision over..what was boone's record???? 16-10 best in britain my arse...that is why he isn't on the list

For me it has to be between Moore and Maklin. I think they both have better boxing brains than Barker. Murray is coming up on the blind side and I think he will be a contender in the not too distant future. The other 2,,,,,, forget about it.

Moore and Maklin II would be a belter, and the winner takes the poll for me, so I edge Moore again. The fact that he's a little Chinese impersonator in his spare time shows that he eats too much sweet and sour pork between fights, but now he's got the flexibility of the 6 extra pounds I see him being stronger and fresher and beating Maklin.

So I call it:
1. Moore
2. Maklin
3. Barker
4. Murray
5. The rest

Mug!!!!!!!!!!

tntround1 wrote:For me it has to be between Moore and Maklin. I think they both have better boxing brains than Barker. Murray is coming up on the blind side and I think he will be a contender in the not too distant future. The other 2,,,,,, forget about it.

Moore and Maklin II would be a belter, and the winner takes the poll for me, so I edge Moore again. The fact that he's a little Chinese impersonator in his spare time shows that he eats too much sweet and sour pork between fights, but now he's got the flexibility of the 6 extra pounds I see him being stronger and fresher and beating Maklin.

So I call it:
1. Moore
2. Maklin
3. Barker
4. Murray
5. The rest

Mug!!!!!!!!!!

better boxing brains than barker what aload of shit

MrBoxingUK2 wrote:

bigped wrote:

MrBoxingUK2 wrote:

#

did i miss a joke? lol ask macklin how the sparring with craig has been going?

no mate i will ask darnell boone the guy that mcewan won a split decision over..what was boone's record???? 16-10 best in britain my arse...that is why he isn't on the list

Have a look through Boones record, some good names on it.

-Andre Ward, lost a close UD
-Lajuan Simon, recent World Title Challenger, DRAW
-Juan Pascal, lost UD
-Fernando Zuniga, lost MD
-Enrique Ornelas, lost close UD

I know he doesn't win much but he has been in with some quality fighters and is a lot better than his record suggests and appears to put up a good fight against most fighters.

danh wrote:

tntround1 wrote:For me it has to be between Moore and Maklin. I think they both have better boxing brains than Barker. Murray is coming up on the blind side and I think he will be a contender in the not too distant future. The other 2,,,,,, forget about it.

Moore and Maklin II would be a belter, and the winner takes the poll for me, so I edge Moore again. The fact that he's a little Chinese impersonator in his spare time shows that he eats too much sweet and sour pork between fights, but now he's got the flexibility of the 6 extra pounds I see him being stronger and fresher and beating Maklin.

So I call it:
1. Moore
2. Maklin
3. Barker
4. Murray
5. The rest

Mug!!!!!!!!!!

better boxing brains than barker what aload of poop

Obviously Poop. Is that Darren??? Like I said Better boxing brain (would both beat him IMO) and obviously just a better brain than danh.... Mug!

tntround1 wrote:

danh wrote:

tntround1 wrote:For me it has to be between Moore and Maklin. I think they both have better boxing brains than Barker. Murray is coming up on the blind side and I think he will be a contender in the not too distant future. The other 2,,,,,, forget about it.

Moore and Maklin II would be a belter, and the winner takes the poll for me, so I edge Moore again. The fact that he's a little Chinese impersonator in his spare time shows that he eats too much sweet and sour pork between fights, but now he's got the flexibility of the 6 extra pounds I see him being stronger and fresher and beating Maklin.

So I call it:
1. Moore
2. Maklin
3. Barker
4. Murray
5. The rest

Mug!!!!!!!!!!

better boxing brains than barker what aload of poop

Obviously Poop. Is that Darren??? Like I said Better boxing brain (would both beat him IMO) and obviously just a better brain than danh.... Mug!

i'll agree with dan...barker has the best boxing brain out of all of them

tntround1 what a twit!!!!!

potnoodle wrote:tntround1 what a twit!!!!!

i agree with you, must be a cockney twit using the word mug.

danh wrote:

potnoodle wrote:tntround1 what a twit!!!!!

i agree with you, must be a cockney twit using the word mug.

Do me a Cheesey Quaver, cause I wouldn't Adam & Eve it if I was you. I'll have to come down the Apple's in me Whistle and cause you some right Barney Rubble, or maybe we can just have a Pig's Ear.

Mug!!!

Eastman was pretty good back in the day, he achieved a lot.

MrBoxingUK2 wrote:

tntround1 wrote:

danh wrote: better boxing brains than barker what aload of poop

Obviously Poop. Is that Darren??? Like I said Better boxing brain (would both beat him IMO) and obviously just a better brain than danh.... Mug!

i'll agree with dan...barker has the best boxing brain out of all of them

Moore still your number 1???

Don't be a smart arse...

A peak and fit Moore (and not weight drained and shattered) was more than a match for Barker or any of these guys. First class fighter, gutted about last night.

As it stands I think Barker is the best.

Deno1986 wrote:

MrBoxingUK2 wrote:

bigped wrote: #

did i miss a joke? lol ask macklin how the sparring with craig has been going?

no mate i will ask darnell boone the guy that mcewan won a split decision over..what was boone's record???? 16-10 best in britain my arse...that is why he isn't on the list

Have a look through Boones record, some good names on it.

-Andre Ward, lost a close UD
-Lajuan Simon, recent World Title Challenger, DRAW
-Juan Pascal, lost UD
-Fernando Zuniga, lost MD
-Enrique Ornelas, lost close UD

I know he doesn't win much but he has been in with some quality fighters and is a lot better than his record suggests and appears to put up a good fight against most fighters.

CRAIG got his stoppage win at the weekend there,

ffrom what I saw it has to be Macklin,

Good shout with McEwan (Scottish Bias again) but I would say Barker, I think he is quality and would beat Macklin.

MrBoxingUK2 wrote:

bigped wrote:CRAIG MCEWAN

Was a nice article on craig in fridays boxing news there. big year for him this year watch this space