Page 2 of 2

Re: Greens Response to Roy

Posted: 06 Apr 2010, 03:53
by Adamj1987
toppity wrote:danny needs to leave these has-beens behind and go have a meaningful fight.
concured lets see him against captain huck

Re: Greens Response to Roy

Posted: 06 Apr 2010, 04:45
by oliverfennell
amwsnw wrote:Can this be posted on current scene ?? Would be great to see the response forn the yanks...
No response from the yanks - just a slanging match between Aussies!

Re: Greens Response to Roy

Posted: 06 Apr 2010, 08:00
by Brute
Adamj1987 wrote:
toppity wrote:danny needs to leave these has-beens behind and go have a meaningful fight.
concured lets see him against captain huck

Why is Huck ranked in front of Cunningham, in spite of Cunningham having KOed him?

Re: Greens Response to Roy

Posted: 06 Apr 2010, 08:02
by dberry
Adamj1987 wrote:
toppity wrote:danny needs to leave these has-beens behind and go have a meaningful fight.
concured lets see him against captain huck
Hear, hear!

Re: Greens Response to Roy

Posted: 06 Apr 2010, 08:09
by dberry
Brute wrote:
Adamj1987 wrote:
toppity wrote:danny needs to leave these has-beens behind and go have a meaningful fight.
concured lets see him against captain huck

Why is Huck ranked in front of Cunningham, in spite of Cunningham having KOed him?
Even after my last post, Ive got to add, Steve Cunningham is the Cruiserweight champion at the moment, reguardless of title held. Huck, though, is a much better prospect than an over the hill, over hyped, blown up middle weight.

Re: Greens Response to Roy

Posted: 06 Apr 2010, 08:10
by dberry
dberry wrote:
Brute wrote:
Adamj1987 wrote: concured lets see him against captain huck

Why is Huck ranked in front of Cunningham, in spite of Cunningham having KOed him?
Even after my last post, Ive got to add, Steve Cunningham is the Cruiserweight champion at the moment, regardless of title held. Huck, though, is a much better prospect than an over the hill, over hyped, blown up middle weight.