Page 2 of 2

Re: Darren Barker v. Grzegorz Proksa

Posted: 14 Apr 2010, 20:39
by Deno1986
MrBoxingUK2 wrote:
Deno1986 wrote:
scrap iron wrote: Nuthuggers?!

I'm sure after Darren beats Proksa he wouldn't mind coming over to Ireland and give Lee a beating :OhYes:
Well, Andy said he wants the fight and has made that public so it's up to Mick Hennessy and Brian Peters to make it, that is if Barker wants to share the same canvas as Lee :wink:
yeh he made it public by saying in an interview :roll: peters needs to contact hennessy and im sure he will..but ghevor is next in line isn't he? so i cant see barker fighting lee
what's the :roll: for? How else would he have made it public, he has aid it on both Irish and British radio aswell. Ghevor is supposed to be AND should be next but if he is, why is Proksa being lined up? Barker should fight his mandatory first and consider the fight against Andy Lee.

Re: Darren Barker v. Grzegorz Proksa

Posted: 15 Apr 2010, 07:09
by MrBoxingUK2
Deno1986 wrote:
MrBoxingUK2 wrote:
Deno1986 wrote: Well, Andy said he wants the fight and has made that public so it's up to Mick Hennessy and Brian Peters to make it, that is if Barker wants to share the same canvas as Lee :wink:
yeh he made it public by saying in an interview :roll: peters needs to contact hennessy and im sure he will..but ghevor is next in line isn't he? so i cant see barker fighting lee
what's the :roll: for? How else would he have made it public, he has aid it on both Irish and British radio aswell. Ghevor is supposed to be AND should be next but if he is, why is Proksa being lined up? Barker should fight his mandatory first and consider the fight against Andy Lee.
how do we know he is fighting this polish guy,only slapbang has told us,gomez said ghevor is next,and im pretty sure he know's the hennessy people :TU:

Re: Darren Barker v. Grzegorz Proksa

Posted: 15 Apr 2010, 07:14
by MrBoxingUK2
barker does not HAVE to fight lee just because the irish want the fight made,there are bigger fights for barker out there that will get him highly ranked in the world rankings ;;-)

Re: Darren Barker v. Grzegorz Proksa

Posted: 15 Apr 2010, 07:25
by Deno1986
MrBoxingUK2 wrote:
Deno1986 wrote:
MrBoxingUK2 wrote: yeh he made it public by saying in an interview :roll: peters needs to contact hennessy and im sure he will..but ghevor is next in line isn't he? so i cant see barker fighting lee
what's the :roll: for? How else would he have made it public, he has aid it on both Irish and British radio aswell. Ghevor is supposed to be AND should be next but if he is, why is Proksa being lined up? Barker should fight his mandatory first and consider the fight against Andy Lee.
how do we know he is fighting this polish guy,only slapbang has told us,gomez said ghevor is next,and im pretty sure he know's the hennessy people :TU:
Slapbang was only relaying information that he heard from a reliable source. I'll let him explain it if he feels like it. I doubt it will be going ahead on that date though after Barker went the distance with Belghe

Re: Darren Barker v. Grzegorz Proksa

Posted: 15 Apr 2010, 08:17
by whiskey
Barker might have to have keyhole surgery on his hip so he can start doing the running again.

Maybe have another fight, or just have the op.

Re: Darren Barker v. Grzegorz Proksa

Posted: 15 Apr 2010, 09:29
by slapbangwhallop
MrBoxingUK2 wrote:
Deno1986 wrote:
MrBoxingUK2 wrote: yeh he made it public by saying in an interview :roll: peters needs to contact hennessy and im sure he will..but ghevor is next in line isn't he? so i cant see barker fighting lee
what's the :roll: for? How else would he have made it public, he has aid it on both Irish and British radio aswell. Ghevor is supposed to be AND should be next but if he is, why is Proksa being lined up? Barker should fight his mandatory first and consider the fight against Andy Lee.
how do we know he is fighting this polish guy,only slapbang has told us,gomez said ghevor is next,and im pretty sure he know's the hennessy people :TU:
A. I dont have to explain myself to dross like yourself.

B. FAO Deano, the fight will most likely not be happening now because the caveat was Barker had to come through the Belgacham fight easily, and as this didnt happen and Barker took the hiding of his (professional) career thus far then they are going to have to reassess the what they do with Frazzling Barren Ducker. ;)

Re: Darren Barker v. Grzegorz Proksa

Posted: 15 Apr 2010, 09:41
by Autobarn
i'm getting confused. i thought macklin was fighting gevor and barker was fighting proska?

can someone properly correct me so i have it right...

Re: Darren Barker v. Grzegorz Proksa

Posted: 15 Apr 2010, 14:25
by potnoodle
All the Irish want Frazzlin??? to fight Lee?? Why should Darren fight him? Barker is an undefeated european champion with BIG fights coming up. Surely lee would be a massive step down? Im sure if it was the other way round you wouldnt be telling lee to fight Barker!!! When Lee proves he is a real contender then i hope the fight happens.

Re: Darren Barker v. Grzegorz Proksa

Posted: 15 Apr 2010, 14:26
by MrBoxingUK2
potnoodle wrote:All the Irish want Frazzlin??? to fight Lee?? Why should Darren fight him? Barker is an undefeated european champion with BIG fights coming up. Surely lee would be a massive step down? Im sure if it was the other way round you wouldnt be telling lee to fight Barker!!! When Lee proves he is a real contender then i hope the fight happens.
x2

Re: Darren Barker v. Grzegorz Proksa

Posted: 15 Apr 2010, 14:30
by slapbangwhallop
potnoodle wrote:All the Irish want Frazzlin??? to fight Lee?? Why should Darren fight him? Barker is an undefeated european champion with BIG fights coming up. Surely lee would be a massive step down? Im sure if it was the other way round you wouldnt be telling lee to fight Barker!!! When Lee proves he is a real contender then i hope the fight happens.
Lee a massive step down? From what? From scrapping a points victory over a guy that Lee just beat convincingly? Aye right ya are son! :lol:

Re: Darren Barker v. Grzegorz Proksa

Posted: 15 Apr 2010, 14:39
by potnoodle
What has Lee got to offer Barker???

Re: Darren Barker v. Grzegorz Proksa

Posted: 15 Apr 2010, 14:41
by slapbangwhallop
potnoodle wrote:What has Lee got to offer Barker???
a chin and a pair of balls! ;)

Re: Darren Barker v. Grzegorz Proksa

Posted: 15 Apr 2010, 14:48
by potnoodle
slapbangwhallop wrote:
potnoodle wrote:What has Lee got to offer Barker???
a chin and a pair of balls! ;)
HaHaHa amazing!!! :lol:

Re: Darren Barker v. Grzegorz Proksa

Posted: 15 Apr 2010, 16:08
by leforge
slapbangwhallop wrote:
leforge wrote:Mccloskey fighting on 7th May. So can't see this being on 7th May too.
I think that this is the craic -

A. The 7th of May bill in London is happening.

B. If Barker coasted through the fight with Affif then he was on with Proksa on the bill

C. Thats now in doubt for obvious reason (thats not a pop just a statement of fact)

D. The McCloskey bill is a movable feast and that date is very provisional.
Mccloskey fighting on Friday 4th July I read. So who will fight on 7th may show?

Re: Darren Barker v. Grzegorz Proksa

Posted: 15 Apr 2010, 16:08
by leforge
I meant 4th June mccloskey fight!