Re: British Ring Earnings? Hatton made almost double Calzaghe!!
Posted: 03 May 2010, 14:23
FLINT TALKS SO MUCH KAK IT IS UNBELIEVABLE! HE IS MAKING EVERYTHING UP TO LOOK KNOWLEDGABLE
MrBoxingUK2 wrote:FLINT TALKS SO MUCH KAK IT IS UNBELIEVABLE! HE IS MAKING EVERYTHING UP TO LOOK KNOWLEDGABLE
What exactly have I made up..............MrBoxingUK2 wrote:FLINT TALKS SO MUCH KAK IT IS UNBELIEVABLE! HE IS MAKING EVERYTHING UP TO LOOK KNOWLEDGABLE
mug? flint your from wales mate, stop watching football factory. also you are a liar, making out haye made 1.5 million of the valuev fight when in reality it was more like 4 or 5 milFLINT ISLAND wrote:MrBoxingUK2 wrote:FLINT TALKS SO MUCH KAK IT IS UNBELIEVABLE! HE IS MAKING EVERYTHING UP TO LOOK KNOWLEDGABLE
Thats not the case you MUG.
I have been backed up in this thread by a couple of posters in regard to Hameds wealth and deals, etc.
The finicial purses are rough estimates - but they are educated guesses.
*Also to the guy who said Calzaghe was paid £1 million for the Veit rematch - it was more around £700,000.
After taxes Haye would have done well to clear a £1 million for ValuevMrBoxingUK2 wrote:mug? flint your from wales mate, stop watching football factory. also you are a liar, making out haye made 1.5 million of the valuev fight when in reality it was more like 4 or 5 milFLINT ISLAND wrote:MrBoxingUK2 wrote:FLINT TALKS SO MUCH KAK IT IS UNBELIEVABLE! HE IS MAKING EVERYTHING UP TO LOOK KNOWLEDGABLE
Thats not the case you MUG.
I have been backed up in this thread by a couple of posters in regard to Hameds wealth and deals, etc.
The finicial purses are rough estimates - but they are educated guesses.
*Also to the guy who said Calzaghe was paid £1 million for the Veit rematch - it was more around £700,000.
so he got taxed 4 mil?FLINT ISLAND wrote:After taxes Haye would have done well to clear a £1 million for ValuevMrBoxingUK2 wrote:mug? flint your from wales mate, stop watching football factory. also you are a liar, making out haye made 1.5 million of the valuev fight when in reality it was more like 4 or 5 milFLINT ISLAND wrote:
Thats not the case you MUG.
I have been backed up in this thread by a couple of posters in regard to Hameds wealth and deals, etc.
The finicial purses are rough estimates - but they are educated guesses.
*Also to the guy who said Calzaghe was paid £1 million for the Veit rematch - it was more around £700,000.
I reckon he did clear a million - but no way did he bank £4 million.
Adam Booth takes his share as well - and Haye pays him extra than the average spit bucket holder - cos Booth is his best mate.
Maybe ive added a zero on there then mate, but i'm sure there was an article somewhere talking about the earnings from that bout and it was in there somewhere - and it was thousands, not hundreds they (perhaps mistakenly) reported.BIGMARK wrote:it wouldnt of been 5000 pounds to show it in a licensed premises more like 250-500. When i ran bars in Central London a Sky PPV boxing event was worked out against the rateable value of the site. I ran a sports bar in Camden for a short time which was a big unit on the high street and we would pay 350 quid for a PPV show but that was in the 90's.G0mez wrote:Depends on how much tax them have had to cough up.
Haye is a tad exagerated on £5m unless him basing himself in the tax haven of Turkish Cyrpus has done him a favour.
I'd expect the Valuev fight to be worth about £1.5 - 2m once they have factored in the licensed premises money. I heard it was £5,000 to show the fight in a pub.
Hatton vs Mayweather must have been worth an absolute packet to Ricky. I bet it ended up about £15m - £20m in the end with tickets, site fee's HBO & SKY money.
I think Hatton got about that for just his two fights with Manny and Floyd so i reckon you can put at least another 10-15 million on that. I imagine Haye will overtake him though, what would fights against the Klits generate?jim wright1 wrote:According to The Times sports rich list published yesterday, 4 Boxers made the 100 richest UK sports star list
Lennox was easily the wealthiest of the boxers with an estimated fortune of £95 million.
Hatton was the second richest on £29 million.
Hamed came in third richest boxer on £ 22 million.
Calzaghe was estimated to be worth £15 million.
Incidentally, Haye was estimated to be worth £5 million.
I wasn't surprised about Lennox and how much he earned but I didn't realise Hatton's wealth compared to his peers!
That is of course if the estimations on the list are anywhere near accurate.
I was also surprised at how far back Haye is, surely considering his achievements so far he must be worth more than that?
It must have been a mistake, my mate ran a huge SU bar and they paid £300 to screen Tyson Bruno 2G0mez wrote:Maybe ive added a zero on there then mate, but i'm sure there was an article somewhere talking about the earnings from that bout and it was in there somewhere - and it was thousands, not hundreds they (perhaps mistakenly) reported.BIGMARK wrote:it wouldnt of been 5000 pounds to show it in a licensed premises more like 250-500. When i ran bars in Central London a Sky PPV boxing event was worked out against the rateable value of the site. I ran a sports bar in Camden for a short time which was a big unit on the high street and we would pay 350 quid for a PPV show but that was in the 90's.G0mez wrote:Depends on how much tax them have had to cough up.
Haye is a tad exagerated on £5m unless him basing himself in the tax haven of Turkish Cyrpus has done him a favour.
I'd expect the Valuev fight to be worth about £1.5 - 2m once they have factored in the licensed premises money. I heard it was £5,000 to show the fight in a pub.
Hatton vs Mayweather must have been worth an absolute packet to Ricky. I bet it ended up about £15m - £20m in the end with tickets, site fee's HBO & SKY money.
The story told by Ian Darke on Sky back in the day was that £500k was dropped off by Naz at his parents' front room in a bin-liner. The story definitely wasnt about £50k.martin_g91 wrote:Blimey, this one got everyone going crazy !
Here's some of the points that have ben mentioned (As I understand them).
Naz's estimate is too low and so is Calzaghe's. Hatton's is a little high but not by much. And nobody has mentioned Lewis. Although he is way ahead of the rest, his estimate is also too low !
Some of the points people are arguing about on here are very simple to correct because they are matters of public record. For example, Calzaghe did get over a million for for the Veit return. This fight was won by purse bid and as a "Super Champion" boxing overseas Joe got an 80/20 split. Public and published at the time. Joe also had the majority of his earnings recorded in his cout case. Public and published.
Hamed did have huge sponsors (Playstation, Adidas, Golden Wonder, ART and so on), plus he was a very active and very well paid World Champion (not sure how much he got for his singing career but he earned every penny of it ;;-) ). It is also true that he has alot of property. His estimate is low.
The story about dropping a bin linner full of cash (50K) in the front room of his perents house was actually supposed to be on the counter in his Dads shop. This didn't happen. He gave his Dad ten grand and reporter made the rest up (not the first time that reporter has done so).
Hatton was a well piad and active champion but never got the cross over sponsors of a Hamed or Lewis. He was always plastered with logo's but they were always smaller, regional firms like builders and phone companies. Nice to get but would never move him up the rich list. Two bumper paydays helped.
Ian darke is, but whilst I'm sure he reported it (like many others at the time) he didn't make it up. It never happenedliamlion wrote:The story told by Ian Darke on Sky back in the day was that £500k was dropped off by Naz at his parents' front room in a bin-liner. The story definitely wasnt about £50k.martin_g91 wrote:Blimey, this one got everyone going crazy !
Here's some of the points that have ben mentioned (As I understand them).
Naz's estimate is too low and so is Calzaghe's. Hatton's is a little high but not by much. And nobody has mentioned Lewis. Although he is way ahead of the rest, his estimate is also too low !
Some of the points people are arguing about on here are very simple to correct because they are matters of public record. For example, Calzaghe did get over a million for for the Veit return. This fight was won by purse bid and as a "Super Champion" boxing overseas Joe got an 80/20 split. Public and published at the time. Joe also had the majority of his earnings recorded in his cout case. Public and published.
Hamed did have huge sponsors (Playstation, Adidas, Golden Wonder, ART and so on), plus he was a very active and very well paid World Champion (not sure how much he got for his singing career but he earned every penny of it ;;-) ). It is also true that he has alot of property. His estimate is low.
The story about dropping a bin linner full of cash (50K) in the front room of his perents house was actually supposed to be on the counter in his Dads shop. This didn't happen. He gave his Dad ten grand and reporter made the rest up (not the first time that reporter has done so).
Hatton was a well piad and active champion but never got the cross over sponsors of a Hamed or Lewis. He was always plastered with logo's but they were always smaller, regional firms like builders and phone companies. Nice to get but would never move him up the rich list. Two bumper paydays helped.
Personlly i find Darke credible.
Expand?FLINT ISLAND wrote:Calzaghe will be jealous now
Calzaghe is so vain in how he compares himself to others
Hatton - Witter would never have generated as much money as some people think, no US network was willing to pay for it and Witter has never been a draw (far from it, in fact).Godfather of Dole wrote:From the massive purses that are generated by trade fights such as Hatton-Witter. If Hatton had netted that fight then he may well have leapt into Lewis' league.Khaosai-Galaxy wrote:Hardly surprising when you consider he headlined 2 record breaking PPV's (with a % deal for both) and sold out large arena's for a number of years.
Where do some people think the money in boxing comes from?
robin reid fight was ppv.mickey1975 wrote:Calzahe never had a pay-per-view fight in this country,Hatton had several.The Mayweather fight was an absolute financial blockbuster.Also,Hatton himself is a "brand",his after dinner speaking,an evening with...,etc,will have kept the money flying in in-between fights.If anything,i am suprised he's not further ahead of Joe in earningsHeartbreak_Kid79 wrote:Hayes wealth should esculate as long as he holds onto his title.
It just shows how moriband the Cruiserweight division is generally regarded i suppose.....
Hatton always seemed to get more exposure than Calzaghe.... it wasn't till later on i his career that Joe went beyond the 'WBO' level, and got superstar fights. Still i'm surprised he is worth twice as much as Calzaghe.
I allways assumed he was a careful type when it came to money. Never seen him in a supercar and he looks like he shops at Next (nowt wrong with that BTW). You see guys like Holyfield and Mayweather and you KNOW for certain they will be broke one day but Hatton seems less flash and a lot smarter.Bomber 1 wrote:Hatton has made an absolute killing.. He made serious dough from both Mayweather and Pac fights.. Even down to tickets alone Im told he made serious ££ on all his fans selling them tickets.. They charged £100 on top of the value on the tickets for a fact for the Mayweather fight cos I know someone who bought one directly from his Dad.. Ricky also made a fortune on the city of manchester bill too!! I think he's closer to 40 mil than 30...![]()
I also believe that if he keeps spending in the promotion business and living it up the way he is he could end up another sad boxing story.. Hopefully not though..
Too true , cost me £1.29 for a cheese n bean melt the other day, you'da got change from a quid this time last year.MachoMan09 wrote:Gregg's isn't as cheap as it once was, though.