BoxRec

Great summary Bennie but I have to disagree with you on this one. Mitchell's fight with Johanssen was life and death and Katsidis hits harder and is much tougher than Johansen. With Prescott, Mitchell deserves respect for a fine win but Prescott has been exposed as somewhat rather limited, depsite having a big punch. I think there are still a lot of questions to answered about Mitchell:has he got the power up at lightweight? Can he handle fighting at a fast past against a pressure fighter for 12 rounds?

We'll find out next week that's for sure. I just think Mitchell would have been better served taking a fight with Jesus Chavez, David Diaz or someone like that to help prepare him for a fight with Katsidis. I just feel Mitchell will have his moments but Katsidis will just be too insistent, walk through Mitchell's punches and outwork him for a decision win or late stoppage. He took some big shots of Escobedo and as you say, his face was a mess at the end. But he just walked through it all and outworked the better boxer in Escobedo. I hope I'm wrong though - I would love to see Mitchell pull it off.

If you saw "Hammer Time" sponsored by "Rainham Steel" with that picture in your local video shop. You'd think it was a gay porn movie.

I thought he was holding hoover attachments Where's the Shake 'n Vac?

come on you Irons

wow...that is bad...but at least it is a little eye-catching....even for the wrong reasons.

Odd that FW would think Katsidis giving Mitchell a clearly too-rough prostate examination whilst he was hoovering would sell a fight......

Maybe he can sell Nathan Cleverly's next fight with a poster of him being spit-roasted by Juergen Braehmer and Tavoris Cloud?

this poster is proper sore :!:

should be called dildo time as he looks like he's tooled up & probably smuggling an extra one in the back door


all jokes aside nothing better then too see an ozzy get batterd round the ring :!:

I dont like the poster much, it has the look of a WWE poster to my mind. Why call it gay which suggests you are anti gay and then follow up by saying you have no problem with gays. Lets be honest, you say pubicly gays are all right, then privately you call them "queer bastards". I can remember a leading homosexual back in the 1970s saying on TV he wanted everyone to refer to homosexuals as gay people. This didnt go down well with a lot of people especially my two cousins whose surname was gay. Until that time gay meant colourful, outgoing and happy. We used to say gay Paris but with the new meaning, we dont say that anymore. At school we were taught homosexuality was abnormal and a very negative practice, now we try to normalise it. My own view is what people do behind closed doors is their business, I just dont want to see it on the streets or in any public place for that matter We are an over tolerant society which is not good for us. Why should I tell my grandkids "you have a choice, opposite or same sex" OK you may think I am a bigot living in the past, thats fine if thats what you beleive. At least I am being honest and not two faced.

WildWaylon wrote:I dont like the poster much, it has the look of a WWE poster to my mind. Why call it gay which suggests you are anti gay and then follow up by saying you have no problem with gays. Lets be honest, you say pubicly gays are all right, then privately you call them "queer bastards". I can remember a leading homosexual back in the 1970s saying on TV he wanted everyone to refer to homosexuals as gay people. This didnt go down well with a lot of people especially my two cousins whose surname was gay. Until that time gay meant colourful, outgoing and happy. We used to say gay Paris but with the new meaning, we dont say that anymore. At school we were taught homosexuality was abnormal and a very negative practice, now we try to normalise it. My own view is what people do behind closed doors is their business, I just dont want to see it on the streets or in any public place for that matter We are an over tolerant society which is not good for us. Why should I tell my grandkids "you have a choice, opposite or same sex" OK you may think I am a bigot living in the past, thats fine if thats what you beleive. At least I am being honest and not two faced.

why call it gay
because it is maybe

i think your getting carried away on the gay front :!:

hurlock wrote:

WildWaylon wrote:I dont like the poster much, it has the look of a WWE poster to my mind. Why call it gay which suggests you are anti gay and then follow up by saying you have no problem with gays. Lets be honest, you say pubicly gays are all right, then privately you call them "queer bastards". I can remember a leading homosexual back in the 1970s saying on TV he wanted everyone to refer to homosexuals as gay people. This didnt go down well with a lot of people especially my two cousins whose surname was gay. Until that time gay meant colourful, outgoing and happy. We used to say gay Paris but with the new meaning, we dont say that anymore. At school we were taught homosexuality was abnormal and a very negative practice, now we try to normalise it. My own view is what people do behind closed doors is their business, I just dont want to see it on the streets or in any public place for that matter We are an over tolerant society which is not good for us. Why should I tell my grandkids "you have a choice, opposite or same sex" OK you may think I am a bigot living in the past, thats fine if thats what you beleive. At least I am being honest and not two faced.

why call it gay
because it is maybe

i think your getting carried away on the gay front :!:

Maybe I am but I dont like the normalising of homosexuality or two faced people.

you seem two faced on the subject.

i dont think its normal as we are here to reproduce.

public displays of affection i find disturbing when kids are walking around, i mean kids dont even know what there mum & dad done to get them here so they are innocent & dont need this early education.& the adopting a kid thing is cruel & im totally against it,but im not homophobic i know & like gay people & some are right characters

That poster is really crappy and cheap.....

hurlock wrote:you seem two faced on the subject.

i dont think its normal as we are here to reproduce.

public displays of affection i find disturbing when kids are walking around, i mean kids dont even know what there mum & dad done to get them here so they are innocent & dont need this early education.& the adopting a kid thing is cruel & im totally against it,but im not homophobic i know & like gay people & some are right characters

How am I two faced? I actually agree with most of what you have said. I am not saying something, while I beleive in another, that would make me two faced. I had horrible experiances as a teenager with homosexuals which hasnt helped me to like them. Two men or two women adopting is to me totally wrong. I am adopted and I see no problem with a normal couple giving a child a happy home. I was supposed to be going to my daughters birthday party this evening but I have decided not to go. A lad of 22 who I have watched grow up is going to be there with his male partner. My choice the lad knows how I feel so we would both be uncomfortable and so would his partner. I am of course homophobic, but I am an honest man and I admit to having no tolerance to homosexuals.

sad state of affairs really as gay people aint evil, they dont choose to be gay & shouldnt be shunned because of it.it makes me feel ill if i see two geezers petting i will either really immaturely laugh or blatantly grimace & i cant help that :!: but i dont hate them for that as im comftable with my own sexuality. somtimes i think people who hate gay's are gay...like they hate them for giving in to gayness i suppose DD

live and let live

Upton Park Fetish Night - Mitchell & Katsidis Regret Letting Graham Norton Do Fight Posters

http://boxedanslemerde.blogspot.com/201 ... -post.html

hurlock wrote:sad state of affairs really as gay people aint evil, they dont choose to be gay & shouldnt be shunned because of it.it makes me feel ill if i see two geezers petting i will either really immaturely laugh or blatantly grimace & i cant help that :!: but i dont hate them for that as im comftable with my own sexuality. somtimes i think people who hate gay's are gay...like they hate them for giving in to gayness i suppose DD

Any gay boxers? Now that would be a first.

Is there any reason to suppose it wouldn't be about 7% of them like the rest of the population

Sounds about right. Got a lesbian and a gay in my family.


Me personally are a lesbian