Page 2 of 2

Re: HOF VOTE: MICHAEL SPINKS

Posted: 12 May 2010, 13:21
by BoxBuzz
LOL...at the WBU level KO's are a dime a dozen

Re: HOF VOTE: MICHAEL SPINKS

Posted: 12 May 2010, 13:26
by SAV
BoxBuzz wrote:LOL...at the WBU level KO's are a dime a dozen
5-1

that is all

Re: HOF VOTE: MICHAEL SPINKS

Posted: 12 May 2010, 13:27
by SAV
BoxBuzz wrote:Well no one other than TJF makes that grade, but Spinks and Max are the only others that might, and I think your right the answer is neither. And TJF is only in because of a flaw in the dynamo.
no way maxi even comes close to being a HOF'er. EOD.

Re: HOF VOTE: MICHAEL SPINKS

Posted: 12 May 2010, 13:31
by BoxBuzz
SAV wrote:
BoxBuzz wrote:Well no one other than TJF makes that grade, but Spinks and Max are the only others that might, and I think your right the answer is neither. And TJF is only in because of a flaw in the dynamo.
no way maxi even comes close to being a HOF'er. EOD.

agreed, same with Moore, Foster and Spinks case closed.

WBU is purely meaningless....Even Bowe was not recognized UNTIL he dominated his way from WBU to EVery title on earth and defended it enough to times to quiet down his detractors.

this was of course before many of you were born.

Re: HOF VOTE: MICHAEL SPINKS

Posted: 16 May 2010, 10:42
by kevo
So what's the verdict?

Re: HOF VOTE: MICHAEL SPINKS

Posted: 16 May 2010, 10:55
by BoxBuzz
Inconclusive.

Re: HOF VOTE: MICHAEL SPINKS

Posted: 16 May 2010, 14:54
by jBacca
I have chlamydia.

Re: HOF VOTE: MICHAEL SPINKS

Posted: 16 May 2010, 15:33
by Neri
Buzz if you want to nominate Rosenbloom then do so in the HOF thread.

But by your logic, if Rosenbloom does deserve to get in then that also means Calzaghe does too, who went 2-1 over your man and dethroned Rosenbloom.

But to be honest, I don't think Joe belongs in the HOF. He was a tough fight for anyone and fought them all with some success but he was not part of the elite, just a good top 10 fighter . The point is if Rosenbloom and Calzaghe got in it would be lowering the bar but feel free to nominate whoever you want.

Re: HOF VOTE: MICHAEL SPINKS

Posted: 16 May 2010, 15:35
by Neri
Looks like it is a yes vote for Michael Spinks.

Congratulations to Spinks and manager Kevo.

Re: HOF VOTE: MICHAEL SPINKS

Posted: 16 May 2010, 15:37
by Neri
How many world title defences (not WBU) did Spinks make?

Re: HOF VOTE: MICHAEL SPINKS

Posted: 16 May 2010, 15:40
by allworld80
Neri wrote:How many world title defences (not WBU) did Spinks make?
If I'm reading his history right, it looks like he was 3-3-1 in world title fights, with one defense.

Re: HOF VOTE: MICHAEL SPINKS

Posted: 16 May 2010, 15:44
by Neri
tzyuforever wrote:
Neri wrote:How many world title defences (not WBU) did Spinks make?
If I'm reading his history right, it looks like he was 3-3-1 in world title fights, with one defense.
Patchy like the majority of world champions. Just shows how great Tiger Jack Fox was.

Re: HOF VOTE: MICHAEL SPINKS

Posted: 16 May 2010, 15:51
by allworld80
Neri wrote:Just shows how great Tiger Jack Fox was.
Fox was 16-2-1 in world title fights

Re: HOF VOTE: MICHAEL SPINKS

Posted: 16 May 2010, 15:53
by allworld80
Calzaghe was 5-4-1

Re: HOF VOTE: MICHAEL SPINKS

Posted: 16 May 2010, 15:54
by allworld80
Rosenbloom was 3-5-4 in title fights

Re: HOF VOTE: MICHAEL SPINKS

Posted: 16 May 2010, 15:56
by allworld80
And Moore was 4-1

Re: HOF VOTE: MICHAEL SPINKS

Posted: 16 May 2010, 15:57
by Neri
Thanks for the stats TF. Very interesting. :TU:

Re: HOF VOTE: MICHAEL SPINKS

Posted: 16 May 2010, 16:03
by jBacca
Deno is online :OhYes:

Re: HOF VOTE: MICHAEL SPINKS

Posted: 16 May 2010, 16:04
by hitman09
Finally.