Page 2 of 2
Re: Regional Belts
Posted: 07 Jun 2010, 17:40
by allworld80
Crease wrote:One more question please Commish?
If a Regional Title holder is repeatedly called out by fighters in the top 25, but decides to defend against lesser boxers who are not in the top 25...
Will you intervene? Make titlists take the hard fights?
The regional belts will have to be defended within a reasonable time frame of being challenged, and should be based more on the order of challenge rather than the ranking.
And by reasonable time frame, I'd say within a few weeks.
Re: Regional Belts
Posted: 07 Jun 2010, 17:48
by Crease
tzyuforever wrote:The regional belts will have to be defended within a reasonable time frame...I'd say within a few weeks.
Are we talking every 2 weeks or every 3 weeks?
tzyuforever wrote:of being challenged, and should be based more on the order of challenge rather than the ranking.
First come, frist served then...
Thanks Commish.
Re: Regional Belts
Posted: 09 Jun 2010, 07:23
by Crease
Commish, I would like to make the application for the Castillo vs Morales fight to become the first NABA title fight.
Both fighters are ranked highly,
Castillo (13th) vs Morales (14th)
You won't get a more high-ranking or high-profile match-up than that for the NABA title.
Re: Regional Belts
Posted: 09 Jun 2010, 08:29
by Deno1986
Crease wrote:Commish, I would like to make the application for the Castillo vs Morales fight to become the first NABA title fight.
Both fighters are ranked highly,
Castillo (13th) vs Morales (14th)
You won't get a more high-ranking or high-profile match-up than that for the NABA title.
The rankings are irrelevant with regional belts.
Pep - Wright is also a high profile fight.