BoxRec

Thanks Kylamy for the updates on what appeared on paper looked a stew, but with now the background to actually what happened in the fight and with the attitude of our fighting representative now out in the open, it easy to see it was a case of us downunder assuming the worst when in fact things were so much different.

ryan711 wrote:king was saying he knocked him down in the first round and they rang the bell straight away and waited to put the count on its bullshit

an oldie but a goodie:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JsDNTF-EUG4

as far as getting robbed overseas. nothings better than when danny williams went to spain and fought konstantin airich on a ahmet oener promotion.

have a look at the 6th round. danny was close to stopping airich and the promoter lent over and rang the bell with 95 secs left in the round...have a listen to the commentators.

attrocious refereeing


"In round two Danny got 2 points deducted for only his 2nd low blow warning.

In round 3 Danny got 2 standing 8 counts even though it was't in the rules. Danny's tape also came loose and he had to cut it himeself after the ref let him fight for over a minute with it.

In round 4 Danny got a count after a slip (he threw a right and slipped).

In round 5 Airich went down and the ref gave him 10 seconds PLUS an extra 10 to recover.

In round 6, Danny had Airich is huge trouble after 1 minute but the bell rang after 1:25 of the round! Unreal!"

paz beat davidson in sydney 2 years ago(king got the decision) have not been a fan of his since,he did improve,but not a lot

p4p1 wrote:

Beltane wrote:Two judges barely giving King a round and the other being on the level giving it to King by a point, suggests a stew of the highest order.

Basically you have to win by KO in these joints.

its the same in australia

Yeah right it's the same in australia certain fighters who train with certain people only have to go the distance

oliverfennell wrote:

dberry wrote:Before jumping to conclusions, has anyone actually seen the fight?

LOL exactly what I was thinking. Who's to say the 114-115 wasn't the dubious score?

Y'see.

Don't just assume a result is crooked just because one of your guys loses a points decision in a foreign land.

oliverfennell wrote:

oliverfennell wrote:

dberry wrote:Before jumping to conclusions, has anyone actually seen the fight?

LOL exactly what I was thinking. Who's to say the 114-115 wasn't the dubious score?

Y'see.

Don't just assume a result is crooked just because one of your guys loses a points decision in a foreign land.

you,re right,i think brad has got it straight from the stable,johnny lewis silence should say it all,not that he ever blows up,the judge you are talking about also has worried me over some of his referreeing,i think everyone should be accountable, and as mark said ,if your from the right stable you are likely to get the nod,it does happen here. all the best