Re: Tony Jeffries Round by Round
Posted: 23 Jul 2010, 18:37
Draw.....Guess I was wrong. Fair score. Banbula would have won for sure if it was ten.
I'm surprised that the ref scored it even. I thought it was a fair verdict, but typically the prospects always get the benefit of the doubt. Although I didn't think highly of Jeffries, I didn't think the first blemish on his record would come to someone of this caliber.Horse wrote:Is anyone surprised?
whicker wrote:Apparantly it was meant to be 6 rounds....
![]()
![]()
![]()
Frank Maloney's interview, thinks Banbula only won round 7 .....
Not really, I've yet to be wowed by him as a pro. He looks solid but lacks the X factor several of the other Olympians have.Horse wrote:Is anyone surprised?
Jeffries barely beat King. I am not sure why they decided to step him up against Banbula when he has been struggling against lesser opposition.crusader wrote:I'm surprised that the ref scored it even. I thought it was a fair verdict, but typically the prospects always get the benefit of the doubt. Although I didn't think highly of Jeffries, I didn't think the first blemish on his record would come to someone of this caliber.
I guess they (and I to some degree) thought the King fight was an off night for Jeffries.Horse wrote:Jeffries barely beat King. I am not sure why they decided to step him up against Banbula when he has been struggling against lesser opposition.crusader wrote:I'm surprised that the ref scored it even. I thought it was a fair verdict, but typically the prospects always get the benefit of the doubt. Although I didn't think highly of Jeffries, I didn't think the first blemish on his record would come to someone of this caliber.
Didn't Maloney say they asked for the change from 8 to 6 on thursday. Looks like stamina could be a real issue with Jeffries, gassed after 6 fairly even paced rounds.whatashambles wrote:Not really, I've yet to be wowed by him as a pro. He looks solid but lacks the X factor several of the other Olympians have.Horse wrote:Is anyone surprised?
Just on the six rounds, looking back through the notes on the bout on Boxrec it was always scheduled to be an 8 rounder, since it was inserted 3 weeks ago
In 8 rounds rather than 6 King would have had him.crusader wrote:I guess they (and I to some degree) thought the King fight was an off night for Jeffries.Horse wrote:Jeffries barely beat King. I am not sure why they decided to step him up against Banbula when he has been struggling against lesser opposition.crusader wrote:I'm surprised that the ref scored it even. I thought it was a fair verdict, but typically the prospects always get the benefit of the doubt. Although I didn't think highly of Jeffries, I didn't think the first blemish on his record would come to someone of this caliber.
Thought that myself about the lack of advice. Shambles all round from Maloney, Jeffries, Rimmer and as you say the cutman.fatman wrote:Jeffries corner want shooting, they where an absolute joke, he had an awful round and the dialogue went, 'come on, look at me Tony, f**cking come on' whats all that about? how about some advice? John Rawling said that Bobby Rimmer was in his corner, was that Rimmer? I could well be wrong but it didnt look like him to me. And they done a poop job on the cut.
I don't get that though. Bout lengths are changed at the last minute regularly. I'm sure there was a fight on a Hatton card this year at the very end of the night that was trimmed in length from 6 to 4.vargas wrote:Didn't Maloney say they asked for the change from 8 to 6 on thursday. Looks like stamina could be a real issue with Jeffries, gassed after 6 fairly even paced rounds.whatashambles wrote:Not really, I've yet to be wowed by him as a pro. He looks solid but lacks the X factor several of the other Olympians have.Horse wrote:Is anyone surprised?
Just on the six rounds, looking back through the notes on the bout on Boxrec it was always scheduled to be an 8 rounder, since it was inserted 3 weeks ago
you would of give i banbula by one? the big idiot didnt throw a punch in anger in the first four which in my boxing book gives jaff the first four soo if you all belive that banbula clearly won the last four then you should take a long look at yourself.. and before u give it the old i am biased bullsh*t i think jaffa boxed poor tonight and the cut and misunderstanding of the fight length added more to the situation but how some of you can say banbula won is beyond me!!billy bessey wrote:plaudits to the ref at last a ref with balls i would habe give it to bambula by 1 but i expected the ref to give it to tony clearly
Jeffries didn't throw much more over the first 4 than Banbula which meant they were all rather Close, and you could make a serious case for a 10-8 final round where Jeffries did feck all, was staggered and out on his feet in the endAdam1991 wrote:you would of give i banbula by one? the big idiot didnt throw a punch in anger in the first four which in my boxing book gives jaff the first four soo if you all belive that banbula clearly won the last four then you should take a long look at yourself.. and before u give it the old i am biased bullsh*t i think jaffa boxed poor tonight and the cut and misunderstanding of the fight length added more to the situation but how some of you can say banbula won is beyond me!!billy bessey wrote:plaudits to the ref at last a ref with balls i would habe give it to bambula by 1 but i expected the ref to give it to tony clearly
He unquestionbly won the last 2 rounds, most people would give Jeffries the first 2.Adam1991 wrote: how some of you can say banbula won is beyond me!!
We say it becaue we are looking at it unbiased and not as a fan or a mate of either fighter.Adam1991 wrote:you would of give i banbula by one? the big idiot didnt throw a punch in anger in the first four which in my boxing book gives jaff the first four soo if you all belive that banbula clearly won the last four then you should take a long look at yourself.. and before u give it the old i am biased bullsh*t i think jaffa boxed poor tonight and the cut and misunderstanding of the fight length added more to the situation but how some of you can say banbula won is beyond me!!billy bessey wrote:plaudits to the ref at last a ref with balls i would habe give it to bambula by 1 but i expected the ref to give it to tony clearly