smith v simpson rd by rd.

crusader · Post by **crusader** » 04 Sep 2010, 16:46

76-76 all even for me.

hurlock · Post by **hurlock** » 04 Sep 2010, 16:46

10-10

cant split them, but close go to home fighter mainly.

tstephenson89 · Post by **tstephenson89** » 04 Sep 2010, 16:46

smith is a much better boxer tho

Baboon · Post by **Baboon** » 04 Sep 2010, 16:47

Chr1st, that is Darke commentating (I'm terrible recognising voices)? If so, he's swung around as if Simpson is now the second coming and Smith is mince. I think Simpson is taking over but Smith is still fighting a decent fight. Oh for some objective commentary....

77-76 Simpson

crusader · Post by **crusader** » 04 Sep 2010, 16:47

Simpson now the betting favorite.

Asterix · Post by **Asterix** » 04 Sep 2010, 16:48

The Sky commentators are almost always terrible. It's best just to ignore them.

TerribleTerry · Post by **TerribleTerry** » 04 Sep 2010, 16:48

Smith is dropping in some lovely shots from the outside but Simpson is killing him in the clinch and timing Swifty with his slower jab from the outside.

C'mon Swifty!

whicker · Post by **whicker** » 04 Sep 2010, 16:49

Quality fight, but then we knew it would be.

hurlock · Post by **hurlock** » 04 Sep 2010, 16:50

10-9 simpson.

crusader · Post by **crusader** » 04 Sep 2010, 16:50

86-85 Simpson

TerribleTerry · Post by **TerribleTerry** » 04 Sep 2010, 16:50

Asterix wrote:The Sky commentators are almost always terrible. It's best just to ignore them.

watching on line with the sound off

Baboon · Post by **Baboon** » 04 Sep 2010, 16:50

Hate giving even rounds, but Smith took the first half of that and simpson the second. Really good fight.

87-86 Simpson

hurlock · Post by **hurlock** » 04 Sep 2010, 16:54

best rd for smith for a while 10-9 for smith

crusader · Post by **crusader** » 04 Sep 2010, 16:54

95-95

Baboon · Post by **Baboon** » 04 Sep 2010, 16:54

Smith landed some lovely straight rights, but lunged with others. SMith's round, but he's going to have to watch being countered when he charges in like that.

Quiet round for Simpson

96-96

dondada · Post by **dondada** » 04 Sep 2010, 16:54

sg1985 wrote:Just threw a tenner at 16/1 on the draw at bet365.

Good shout, young un.

tstephenson89 · Post by **tstephenson89** » 04 Sep 2010, 16:55

smiths got the class and am pedigree simpsons got the brute strength and quaker porridge oats inside him

hurlock · Post by **hurlock** » 04 Sep 2010, 16:58

smith boxing & moving well but getting caught with silly shots

10-10 all down to the last rd :!:

crusader · Post by **crusader** » 04 Sep 2010, 16:58

105-104 Simpson

dondada · Post by **dondada** » 04 Sep 2010, 16:58

Simpson's best round of the fight, for me. Swifty needs to pull this last one out of his arse, for sure.

Baboon · Post by **Baboon** » 04 Sep 2010, 16:58

106-105...10-9 Simpson

All of a sudden Smith falling short with his punches. Better work countering and on the inside from Simpson.

TerribleTerry · Post by **TerribleTerry** » 04 Sep 2010, 16:59

tstephenson89 wrote:smiths got the class and am pedigree simpsons got the brute strength and quaker porridge oats inside him

Both lads are putting on a great fight - all credit to them both

tstephenson89 · Post by **tstephenson89** » 04 Sep 2010, 16:59

alot to respect for the pair of them i fuckin love a good tear up.

ThereByTheGrace · Post by **ThereByTheGrace** » 04 Sep 2010, 17:00

A pair of plodders - Lindsay will be sitting laughing watching this dross

Baboon · Post by **Baboon** » 04 Sep 2010, 17:01

10-9 Simpson

116-114 Simpson

Simpson landed better shots inside again. Nice uppercut in their too.

smith v simpson rd by rd.

Re: smith v simpson rd by rd.

Re: smith v simpson rd by rd.

Re: smith v simpson rd by rd.

Re: smith v simpson rd by rd.

Re: smith v simpson rd by rd.

Re: smith v simpson rd by rd.

Re: smith v simpson rd by rd.

Re: smith v simpson rd by rd.

Re: smith v simpson rd by rd.

Re: smith v simpson rd by rd.

Re: smith v simpson rd by rd.

Re: smith v simpson rd by rd.

Re: smith v simpson rd by rd.

Re: smith v simpson rd by rd.

Re: smith v simpson rd by rd.

Re: smith v simpson rd by rd.

Re: smith v simpson rd by rd.

Re: smith v simpson rd by rd.

Re: smith v simpson rd by rd.

Re: smith v simpson rd by rd.

Re: smith v simpson rd by rd.

Re: smith v simpson rd by rd.

Re: smith v simpson rd by rd.

Re: smith v simpson rd by rd.

Re: smith v simpson rd by rd.