Page 2 of 3
Re: Shane Cameron versus Anthony McCracken
Posted: 17 Nov 2010, 20:33
by Craig14
Sounds a great fight. The only person who had it for McCracken (on what I've read on this thread) is a first time poster who could be McCrackens mum or Anthony McCracken himself. If that's the case unlucky sport

Re: Shane Cameron versus Anthony McCracken
Posted: 17 Nov 2010, 21:26
by dan h
yid14 wrote:Sounds a great fight. The only person who had it for McCracken (on what I've read on this thread) is a first time poster who could be McCrackens mum or Anthony McCracken himself. If that's the case unlucky sport

Mate I have hundreds of posts??
I watched it with 2 other and we all scored it to Macracken by 2-3rounds. Cameron threw some great body shots but all through the middle rounds he looked tired and was wearing a lot of punches.
Regardless of who people though won I think it is a unanimous opinion that Green should not be wasting time fighting Cameron. Get him in with Vea
Re: Shane Cameron versus Anthony McCracken
Posted: 17 Nov 2010, 21:30
by crusader
Get Green in with another top 10/15ish type of fighter. I think it would be a bad move to go from clearly beating a guy like B.J. Flores to fighting Vea or Cameron. Green showed last night he is a world class CW. There is no need to be fighting guys who are struggling at a much lower level. I know Cameron is ranked number 21 by BoxRec, but I think that is a very inflated rating. He should not have been pushed by McCracken.
Re: Shane Cameron versus Anthony McCracken
Posted: 17 Nov 2010, 21:39
by dan h
crusader wrote:Get Green in with another top 10/15ish type of fighter. I think it would be a bad move to go from clearly beating a guy like B.J. Flores to fighting Vea or Cameron. Green showed last night he is a world class CW. There is no need to be fighting guys who are struggling at a much lower level. I know Cameron is ranked number 21 by BoxRec, but I think that is a very inflated rating. He should not have been pushed by McCracken.
Sorry what I meant was get Cameron in with Vea, not Green
I think Green should really try and find out just how good he is by trying to unify CW or win legit titles at LHW again and then retire.
Re: Shane Cameron versus Anthony McCracken
Posted: 17 Nov 2010, 22:02
by AntonS
dan h wrote:crusader wrote:Get Green in with another top 10/15ish type of fighter. I think it would be a bad move to go from clearly beating a guy like B.J. Flores to fighting Vea or Cameron. Green showed last night he is a world class CW. There is no need to be fighting guys who are struggling at a much lower level. I know Cameron is ranked number 21 by BoxRec, but I think that is a very inflated rating. He should not have been pushed by McCracken.
Sorry what I meant was get Cameron in with Vea, not Green
I think Green should really try and find out just how good he is by trying to unify CW or win legit titles at LHW again and then retire.
What's a
legit title these days??
Re: Shane Cameron versus Anthony McCracken
Posted: 17 Nov 2010, 22:05
by dan h
AntonS wrote:dan h wrote:crusader wrote:Get Green in with another top 10/15ish type of fighter. I think it would be a bad move to go from clearly beating a guy like B.J. Flores to fighting Vea or Cameron. Green showed last night he is a world class CW. There is no need to be fighting guys who are struggling at a much lower level. I know Cameron is ranked number 21 by BoxRec, but I think that is a very inflated rating. He should not have been pushed by McCracken.
Sorry what I meant was get Cameron in with Vea, not Green
I think Green should really try and find out just how good he is by trying to unify CW or win legit titles at LHW again and then retire.
What's a
legit title these days??
Good question that I could write a PHD on but won't.
What I consider it to be is WBC, WBA and IBF. some credit to WBO.
Re: Shane Cameron versus Anthony McCracken
Posted: 17 Nov 2010, 22:24
by Craig14
dan h wrote:yid14 wrote:Sounds a great fight. The only person who had it for McCracken (on what I've read on this thread) is a first time poster who could be McCrackens mum or Anthony McCracken himself. If that's the case unlucky sport

Mate I have hundreds of posts??
I watched it with 2 other and we all scored it to Macracken by 2-3rounds. Cameron threw some great body shots but all through the middle rounds he looked tired and was wearing a lot of punches.
Regardless of who people though won I think it is a unanimous opinion that Green should not be wasting time fighting Cameron. Get him in with Vea
Sorry mate I skipped over your response, I have no right to comment really (having not seen the fight) just abit of a Shane Cameron fan apologies

Re: Shane Cameron versus Anthony McCracken
Posted: 18 Nov 2010, 02:03
by Rogue
crusader wrote:Get Green in with another top 10/15ish type of fighter. I think it would be a bad move to go from clearly beating a guy like B.J. Flores to fighting Vea or Cameron. Green showed last night he is a world class CW. There is no need to be fighting guys who are struggling at a much lower level. I know Cameron is ranked number 21 by BoxRec, but I think that is a very inflated rating. He should not have been pushed by McCracken.
hmmmmm
Re: Shane Cameron versus Anthony McCracken
Posted: 18 Nov 2010, 03:49
by N2 Shape
Flores is a decent operator but WAY below World Class level........hes very much a stay the hell outa trouble fighter and wont take NO risks. A glance at his record would show the following as his best wins.....
Darnell wilson
Epifanio Mendoza
Patrick Nwamu
Hardly inspiring stuff!!
Having said that Green fought well against a much bigger guy, i think the Cameron fight makes the most sense for Green right now, he can cash in again big time with that fight. And after watching last night I think green beats Shane. Shane will at least press forward and look to throw meaningful shots but i think Danny is just to experience and seasonsed for him, Shane looks like he was lost some of his pop, and also looks suspect in the chin department with McCracken stunning him numerous times. His cuts are once again also a worry!
Re: Shane Cameron versus Anthony McCracken
Posted: 18 Nov 2010, 07:48
by dan h
I dont see how it makes money. Everyne has seen Cameron's last 2 fights on Green cards so they know he is going to get koed in 2rds, no one is going to want t pay for that. I have bought every green fight I can remember and I would no way in hell buy Green v Cameron. I would rather pay to see Macracken fight Green because at least he deserves a pay check.
Cameron should go back up to heavy. Green should fight Tomas Adamek.
Re: Shane Cameron versus Anthony McCracken
Posted: 18 Nov 2010, 10:02
by Hounddawg
I'm sorry i really shouldn't of read that last post....oh well here we go.
Flores is world class sorry,if he's not world class, at what level are your fighters, remember he's only 31, at the higher weights thats a young contender?
Fairs fair...don't hate, appreciate
How can you be the only person that thinks that Green vs Cameron makes sense, what haven't you learn't anything yet, does everyone on here speak spanish to you mate?
Cameron is as I've always said is a very average fighter.
Re: Shane Cameron versus Anthony McCracken
Posted: 18 Nov 2010, 17:28
by N2 Shape
Houndawg..........i always love these debates with you, however when have i ever claimed any of my fighters are world class??? NONE are until they beat world class opposition. In the meantime Green has made a habit of fighting washed up scrubs in his comeback Briggs lets not forget was a complete joke and made Aussie boxing a laughing stock! Flores I will commend him for as a legit opponent but certainly not WORLD class mate get a grip son, Flores is a good operator and sits as a B level fighter as he has NEVER beaten a top guy yet himself. Flores was actually taking a step up in opposition in fighting Green and I commend him for that even if Green himself was stepping up to a proper Cruiser.
Im not slagging Green off it was a good fight and a good opponent to be in with but if anyone thinks Flores is WORLD class then they are dreaming!
Re: Shane Cameron versus Anthony McCracken
Posted: 18 Nov 2010, 17:32
by crusader
N2 Shape wrote:Houndawg..........i always love these debates with you, however when have i ever claimed any of my fighters are world class??? NONE are until they beat world class opposition. In the meantime Green has made a habit of fighting washed up scrubs in his comeback Briggs lets not forget was a complete joke and made Aussie boxing a laughing stock! Flores I will commend him for as a legit opponent but certainly not WORLD class mate get a grip son, Flores is a good operator and sits as a B level fighter as he has NEVER beaten a top guy yet himself. Flores was actually taking a step up in opposition in fighting Green and I commend him for that even if Green himself was stepping up to a proper Cruiser.
Im not slagging Green off it was a good fight and a good opponent to be in with but if anyone thinks Flores is WORLD class then they are dreaming!
Darnell Wilson was ranked in the top ten by The Ring and most publications when Flores clearly defeated him. So he has beaten an opponent who was considered world class at the time.
Re: Shane Cameron versus Anthony McCracken
Posted: 18 Nov 2010, 18:09
by bigred83
N2 Shape wrote:Flores is a decent operator but WAY below World Class level........hes very much a stay the hell outa trouble fighter and wont take NO risks. A glance at his record would show the following as his best wins.....
Darnell wilson
Epifanio Mendoza
Patrick Nwamu
Hardly inspiring stuff!!
Having said that Green fought well against a much bigger guy, i think the Cameron fight makes the most sense for Green right now, he can cash in again big time with that fight. And after watching last night I think green beats Shane. Shane will at least press forward and look to throw meaningful shots but i think Danny is just to experience and seasonsed for him, Shane looks like he was lost some of his pop, and also looks suspect in the chin department with McCracken stunning him numerous times. His cuts are once again also a worry!
you say flores is "WAY below world class level" so where does that sit cameron?
im sorry mate but the cameron fight makes less sense than siaca or briggs. at least there were decent angles to those fights(although i never agreed with the briggs fight from the day it was mentioned as a possibility on this forum). green has taken a step forward with this last fight, and should continue to do so. to fight cameron will be a massive step backwards IMO. i appreciate you backing your fellow kiwi, but lets be honest here its a pointless fight apart from giving cameron a payday. a much better fight for cameron would be to build up a com title fight with vea for a few months. would be a much better and evenly matched fight as well. danny should aim for maybe the polish bloke, or jones as a step towards the TOP guys. but hey thats just my spin on it.
Re: Shane Cameron versus Anthony McCracken
Posted: 18 Nov 2010, 18:36
by Marlin
dan h wrote:I dont see how it makes money. Everyne has seen Cameron's last 2 fights on Green cards so they know he is going to get koed in 2rds, no one is going to want t pay for that. I have bought every green fight I can remember and I would no way in hell buy Green v Cameron. I would rather pay to see Macracken fight Green because at least he deserves a pay check.
Cameron should go back up to heavy. Green should fight Tomas Adamek.
He is well and truly entrenched in the heavyweight division now.
Re: Shane Cameron versus Anthony McCracken
Posted: 18 Nov 2010, 19:09
by dan h
Hey MARLIN I hear what your saying but all I mean is that is the fight I think he should make from my point of view because I would pay to watch it and it would be an absolute WAR! I realise Adamek is staying put at HW but c'mon don't tell me you wouldn't love to see Green v Adamek?
I any event we can all talk about what we want to see but at the end of the day, like always with Green and Mundine (post about 2005), his next fight will 9/10 be a fight that leaves us wanting. Ie Shane Cameron.
N2Shape are you saying Flores isn't world class but Cameron is? I think Flores would easily outpoint Cameron
Re: Shane Cameron versus Anthony McCracken
Posted: 18 Nov 2010, 20:09
by Marlin
BRASH American BJ Flores wants another crack at Danny Green - and will fight on his undercard to get it.
The Daily Telegraph can reveal Flores - who gave Australia's IBO cruiserweight champ his toughest fight since emerging from retirement two years ago - is tipped to be back in Australia next year fighting on a Green Machine Promotions event.
While the outgoing Las Vegan is gunning for a rematch with the West Australian, it's understood contract clauses insist he would have to excel in one or two undercard events before any talk of a second title shot.
"But I'd fight Danny Green again next month," Flores said when cornered at Perth airport yesterday.
"I know Markus Beyer gave him a rematch so, having made so many fans here in Australia, maybe Team Green could do the same with me - but this time at a bigger stadium in Sydney.
"You only had to see Danny after the bout to know what sort of fight I gave him. Check out his eye, his cheek, his jaw. I'm keen to get us fighting again and if, as part of our contract, that means me fighting on one of his undercards, I'd love to do it."
Despite starting as a $5 outsider with bookies, Flores attacked Green all night in a bout that was closer than the judges' scorecards of 116-112, 117-111 and 116-112.
"But it just wasn't enough to win in his home town," Flores shrugged.
"Unfortunately, the close rounds, they all went to Danny. And that's because he's a cagey fighter, a smart fighter and against me he was the busier fighter, even if those punches weren't effective.
"Honestly, people expected him to blow me over but I was never rocked, never saw stars. His trainer [Angelo Hyder] said Danny was going to cut me in half but the punches, they never hurt me."
Asked about his Hollywood-style approach to the fight, the man dubbed El Peligroso added: "Everyone said 'oh, BJ Flores is all talk', said I was just another cocky American.
"But I think people would agree I backed it up because when was the last time you saw Danny Green forced to fight like that? I don't think he's ever been forced to move back like that over 12 rounds.
"Actually, I was disappointed he was moving back the whole time because it felt like I was having to chase down the ferocious puncher.
"It felt like if I didn't come forward I wouldn't have got a fight. He felt a couple of my punches early and didn't want to come forward, so I tried to make the fight."
Flores said a strong overhand right he struck Green with in the fifth almost turned the bout.
"But he's very cagey," Flores said. "I came to his home town, weighed in at 195 pounds [88.5kg], I did everything he asked of me. And despite the fact everyone always talks about his power, I was never rocked, never hurt."
Maybe Cameron v Flores on a Green's next under card?
I actually wouldn't mind seeing that fight and I guess the winner would have a claim to getting a fight with Green???
Re: Shane Cameron versus Anthony McCracken
Posted: 18 Nov 2010, 20:38
by foxdog1923
See I always had my doubts about Danny Green being a puncher. He's a good boxer but puncher??...I dont think so and Flores confirmed this.
Good win by Danny though but next time I hear someone say Danny is a puncher Im gonna be thinkin pffft despite his string of KOs. Most of those KOs came through because he outclassed his opponents not 1 punch power that he only displayed once against Roy Jones so old might as well end his name with senior.
Re: Shane Cameron versus Anthony McCracken
Posted: 18 Nov 2010, 20:48
by Hounddawg
Foxdog, nice observation, he's no puncher like Ali is he, or david Tua is he? man you know your shitt, can't wait to see what comes next from you mate......Your really inciteful.
Vea will get the job Done by KO against Cameron.
Re: Shane Cameron versus Anthony McCracken
Posted: 19 Nov 2010, 04:19
by foxdog1923
Why dont you go and ask Flores FFS...lol
"Honestly, people expected him to blow me over but I was never rocked, never saw stars. His trainer [Angelo Hyder] said Danny was going to cut me in half but the punches, they never hurt me."-B.J Flores
I know B.J got beat, Danny was too good. B.J was in enough exchanges to feel Dannys power but when I was watching the fight it didnt look like Dannys power was really hurting B.J and vice versa. The statement above confirmed my suspiscions that I had during the fight.
Re: Shane Cameron versus Anthony McCracken
Posted: 19 Nov 2010, 05:53
by Hounddawg
foxdog1923 wrote:Why dont you go and ask Flores FFS...lol
"Honestly, people expected him to blow me over but I was never rocked, never saw stars. His trainer [Angelo Hyder] said Danny was going to cut me in half but the punches, they never hurt me."-B.J Flores
I know B.J got beat, Danny was too good. B.J was in enough exchanges to feel Dannys power but when I was watching the fight it didnt look like Dannys power was really hurting B.J and vice versa. The statement above confirmed my suspiscions that I had during the fight.
Wow....no really.. that was humane, and structured.
If you've seen Danny fight, you would have known that he had a plan for 12,why do you ask, well i'm glad you asked
Ever seen Green throw just 1 or 2 punch Combo's when rocking his opponents, and i don't know what feed you were watching but on my bigass TV ,3 feet away, I seen his head and Balance come undone quite a few times, only for Green to retreat.
Green was the quicker puncher, when everyone, including myself thought Flores was the quicker fighter. Handspeed went to Green.
Green also attempted the whole fight to lure Flores into trap, or was he simply just toying with Flores head.
Either way it was like Green was playing to Flores strengths, it mentally fucked flores, it took away his size,confidence and reach.
It was a really well thought out fight. Flores felt the power, you can't be serious that you actually believe an American boxer when he says he wasn't rocked/hurt. I've seen fighters who've been knockedout/stopped who later were interviewed saying it didn't hurt
So Greens not a puncher, well who the fark is?
Re: Shane Cameron versus Anthony McCracken
Posted: 19 Nov 2010, 06:23
by Hounddawg
N2 Shape wrote:Houndawg..........i always love these debates with you, however when have i ever claimed any of my fighters are world class??? NONE are until they beat world class opposition. In the meantime Green has made a habit of fighting washed up scrubs in his comeback Briggs lets not forget was a complete joke and made Aussie boxing a laughing stock! Flores I will commend him for as a legit opponent but certainly not WORLD class mate get a grip son, Flores is a good operator and sits as a B level fighter as he has NEVER beaten a top guy yet himself. Flores was actually taking a step up in opposition in fighting Green and I commend him for that even if Green himself was stepping up to a proper Cruiser.
Im not slagging Green off it was a good fight and a good opponent to be in with but if anyone thinks Flores is WORLD class then they are dreaming!
"But to hear you say it , makes me love you baby" Cuba gooding jnr, Jerry Mcguire.
I love the debates as well, and it doesn't go too far
We'll find out very soon if he's more than you think, personally i thought he performed really well, he's world class your just simply hating.
He's very young for his size, his mums hot, his Mrs even hotter, and everyone of them are promotional machines, well spoken people.
Did i forget to mention he can fight, surely everyone here agrees.
Crusader thanks for the facts on Darnell. Not many people wanted Flores, Green has just thrown him a huge bone and Flores will run with it.
I really don't want to see a rematch personally, but why doesn't GreenMachine promote Flores for a couple of undercard fights.
Re: Shane Cameron versus Anthony McCracken
Posted: 19 Nov 2010, 07:57
by foxdog1923
Ive got no real way to prove my points. Ive just recently become a Green fan and have watched some of his old fights against decent oppositon and the ones Ive seen he normally breaks down his opponents and then knocks them out. I think B.J was expecting Danny to do the same and thats why B.J made the comments that he did.
IMO I dont see Danny as a puncher but I have no real way to prove this and with his string of KOs it makes my point even harder get across. I still hold on to my beliefs and keep them reserved.
Oh and I'd love to see Vea and Shane. I'd say Shane via KO in the late rounds.
Re: Shane Cameron versus Anthony McCracken
Posted: 19 Nov 2010, 09:56
by amwsnw
Green is a puncher dont worry about that. What green is not is an Ali or RJJ when it comes to foot work. He was on the ropes many times and BJ would not come in and exchange because he felt Danny's power a couple of times and didnt like it. He may not of been rocked but he was hurt.
I for one wouldnt mind seeing a rematch. A fight with Cameron may have interest in NZ but would only draw loud criticism from here.
Ideally, get another champ over here. I am sure GMP can match any purse Cunningham coul;d get in the USA. Cameron v Flores on the undercard would be a good match up but I see someone as slick as BJ winning a wide UD in that one.
Re: Shane Cameron versus Anthony McCracken
Posted: 19 Nov 2010, 22:53
by jezzamundo
Danny Green is unquestionably a huge puncher at 168lb and 175lb, but in the 200lb Cruiserweight division, his power is good enough, but nothing special. He certainly shook Flores a few times, but never had him badly hurt.
I disagree that Green was the quicker fighter - Flores clearly had the advantage in handspeed, especially early in the fight. Green realised this and knew that if he kept coming forward he would be countered all night. He fought a good game plan by making Flores be the aggressor - something that Flores was clearly not comfortable doing. It makes me wonder if this would have been a better strategy for fighting Mundine back in 2006, I actually think it would have been (although Green was clearly drained and low on energy and probably would have lost anyway).
I'd pick Flores to stop Cameron late, possibly on cuts if they ever fought. If not, a rather wide decision to Flores. I wouldn't mind seeing Green vs Flores 2, but I hope he fights another world class opponent first.