Can you imagine somebody beating Liam Walsh, and then having to face Michael and Ryan in his next fights because it was in the original contract for facing Liam ?! I know they are different weights but I use the point to illustrate how daft it is that, if you beat Wlad, you must face Vitali next. This isn't a clause for the good of the sport, it is a clause for the good of the Klischko's.
I'm no apologist for Haye, and its great to see him making his own way in the division. The WBA route wasn't open to him when he moved into the heavyweight division, so he made a big fuss calling out the Klitschko's, as he'd nothing to lose. Negotiations stalled over the unfair, loaded terms that the Klitschko's demanded, and David went in another direction, dethroning Valuev, stopping his mandatory challenger Ruiz, and now he's cashing in on an inevitable domestic showdown, which will cap an outstanding year for him as a British athlete. Audley doesn't deserve a title shot but the sport is full of undeserving challengers. If Haye fought Shannon Briggs or Albert Sosnowski in 2010, anoraks on here would be slagging him off. Stuff the critics David, line your pockets and keep winning, that's what the greedy Klitschko's are doing