Page 2 of 9

Re: Boxing Monthly - Excellent Read

Posted: 23 Nov 2010, 14:10
by Adamj1987
Ian 'Mr' McNeilly wrote:
gasman wrote:Who were these chief sportswriters et al you were giving out about in the editorial! :lol: I bet I can guess (and I agree totally with your sentiments!) :OhYes:
Listen my man, I go all over the fecking place, to big shows and small (though not as often as I used to, granted). For the Ruiz fight, hardly any of the fellas to whom Glyn refers showed up - no story, you see? You get the lads from the nationals who cover boxing - Ron Lewis, Jeff Powell, Kevin Mitchell, Gareth Davies, Pat Sheehan, Nick Parkinson etc - but when there's a 'big' fight, the general sports journos (i.e. football writers who occasionally turn their hands to turn up and they know absolutely f*ck all.

I was going to do a 'bits and bobs' piece from ringside about it. Some silly c*nt wrote down 'Dave Perrez' instead of Dave Parris; another had written that it was for the WBO title, etc.

I knew about 20% of those in the press section. We need the sport to be more mainstream but it's dangerous in the hands of silly buggers who know nowt.
totally agree Ian, reading some of the pieces in the rags i pick things up all the time and i wouldn't say I'm the best to pick up mistakes. they should do what Buncy suggested in a BM many moons ago and a newspaper give a guy a small column to cover the domestic and European fights and the papers wouldn't be so unprepared when a 'big' fight happens.

Re: Boxing Monthly - Excellent Read

Posted: 23 Nov 2010, 14:50
by big lennox
hitman_hatton1 wrote:yeah guillermo jones was a lucky one.

although he subsequently failed a drugs test so it didn't matter. :oops:

jones & sellars were the 2 best he boxed during his title reign.

not much to write home about.

carl thompson deserved a rematch.

although i blame warren for being a stubborn old goat on that one. :roll:
Jones went on to do very well, and Sellers absolutely blasted Carl Thompson, which showed his quality and punching power.I think Johnny beat some very good fighters in his time. He also got top side of Jirov in sparring as well...there was a reason why Jirov didn't fight him when the fight was being mooted :-)

Re: Boxing Monthly - Excellent Read

Posted: 23 Nov 2010, 15:20
by Final round
A new issue already?!...time flies.

Re: Boxing Monthly - Excellent Read

Posted: 23 Nov 2010, 16:37
by dondada
Final round wrote:A new issue already?!...time flies.
Yes, they're out every month :lol:

Seriously though, I know what you mean.

Re: Boxing Monthly - Excellent Read

Posted: 23 Nov 2010, 17:48
by Final round
Ian 'Mr' McNeilly wrote:
Final round wrote:A new issue already?!...time flies.
Yes, they're out every month :lol:

Seriously though, I know what you mean.

:D Last months copy is still lingering around, open on the rankings page next to me!

Re: Boxing Monthly - Excellent Read

Posted: 23 Nov 2010, 17:50
by dondada
Final round wrote:
Ian 'Mr' McNeilly wrote:
Final round wrote:A new issue already?!...time flies.
Yes, they're out every month :lol:

Seriously though, I know what you mean.

:D Last months copy is still lingering around, open on the rankings page next to me!
I think Jan's is out even quicker so the hard working editor can get pissed for a month.

Re: Boxing Monthly - Excellent Read

Posted: 23 Nov 2010, 17:58
by Final round
Ian 'Mr' McNeilly wrote:
Final round wrote:
Ian 'Mr' McNeilly wrote: Yes, they're out every month :lol:

Seriously though, I know what you mean.

:D Last months copy is still lingering around, open on the rankings page next to me!
I think Jan's is out even quicker so the hard working editor can get pissed for a month.
:lol: Complete with free Calendar I hope!

Re: Boxing Monthly - Excellent Read

Posted: 23 Nov 2010, 18:46
by LeedsLad
I hope he is serious about getting Froch on Sky.

Really though, Sky need to re-examine their policy of giving contracts to promoters. Instead they should make them bid for TV dates by putting together top quality cards like the Mag 7. If a card is good enough, give it a date..... treat PPV's on their own merit rather than having certain fighters on PPV regardless.

I'm sure the likes of Haye won't run away to the BBC just because Sky get the stick out and start playing hard ball..... because they don't want to know boxing any more!

The dross that was Haye vs Harrison shouldn't be repeated - the main event was gash as predicted, but they need to show the undercard action live. It was a missed opportunity for people to take some interest in the likes of Stuart Hall.... yet we seem to be saying the same thing over and over.

Less chat, more action.

Oh, and bin the Commonwealth title, asap :lol:

Re: Boxing Monthly - Excellent Read

Posted: 24 Nov 2010, 05:13
by Glyn Leach
Ian 'Mr' McNeilly wrote:I think Jan's is out even quicker so the hard working editor can get pissed for a month.
Oi! I'm polishing the next one off by the 8th then into hospital for major life-threatening real man surgery on the 10th (hip replacement, smashed the old one several years ago in New York having fallen out of a cab after an evening on the beer with Bunce, can't remember what fight I was there for) — laid up for six weeks, so I'll be going nowhere this Xmas (which is not to say I won't be getting drunk, probably quite often).

But yes, the issues do come thick and fast at this time of year. Next one will be out 15th Dec, and yes, free calendar again. And no, it won't include any 11 Dec reports, which drives me up the wall. We just can't extend our deadline at that time of year — if we did, it would mean coming out on 22nd Dec, which would be suicidal sales-wise. Gutter but no way around it.

Re: Boxing Monthly - Excellent Read

Posted: 24 Nov 2010, 13:21
by princess
Glyn Leach wrote:
princess wrote:
Glyn Leach wrote:
Should have asked Adam Smith that?
I'd definitely like to know what he has to say about that, for sure, but that's with hindsight. The interview, which was done about a month ago, is about Smith — a specific fight isn't the issue when the man has just been made head of Sky boxing, the most powerful man in boxing not called Barney Francis. The interview is about Smith, his general policy and vision, and I think he explains himself well. Why don't you tweet him, find out about any specific fights or specific issues that may concern you, I'm sure he'll answer. but at the time we spoke to him, that fight wasn't an issue.
How many Bridesmaids do we need honey x[/quote]

Ahah, you! Good, I'm stitching you up good and proper in the next issue![/quote]

You know i like being stitched up thats why i,m marrying you :OhYes:

Re: Boxing Monthly - Excellent Read

Posted: 24 Nov 2010, 13:23
by J
:OhYes: u coudl go visit him in hospital Jane...he wont be able to run away...sorry Glyn :DDD

Re: Boxing Monthly - Excellent Read

Posted: 25 Nov 2010, 02:58
by oliverfennell
hitman_hatton1 wrote:remember that fight when he barely threw a shot for 6 rds.

then bang and knocked the guy out. :D
That fight? Didn't you just describe all of them?

Seriously, though, if it was the Sellers fight, Nelson was the only boxer who could make a contest that saw both men go down, a bad injury, a one-punch knockout and a from-behind win boring!

Re: Boxing Monthly - Excellent Read

Posted: 25 Nov 2010, 06:31
by Bomber 1
It's always a great read, I've never bought a bad copy

Re: Boxing Monthly - Excellent Read

Posted: 25 Nov 2010, 07:14
by Buncey
The New York gig was the famous non-fight...one pregnant boxer, Duran in a foul mood and Holyfield's man with a disease...fight off. But, we got our unique press passes...all offers accepted for the laminate which is still in a brown envelope. Money will go to buying GL flowers and grapes.
By the way, BBC London 94.9 tonight (Thurs) at 8pm for an hour with an all-star cast of thousands.

Adios.

Re: Boxing Monthly - Excellent Read

Posted: 25 Nov 2010, 07:35
by Glyn Leach
Buncey wrote:The New York gig was the famous non-fight...one pregnant boxer, Duran in a foul mood and Holyfield's man with a disease...fight off. But, we got our unique press passes...all offers accepted for the laminate which is still in a brown envelope. Money will go to buying GL flowers and grapes.
By the way, BBC London 94.9 tonight (Thurs) at 8pm for an hour with an all-star cast of thousands.

Adios.
Holyfield-Akinwande! Christ that was a depressing trip.

Re: Boxing Monthly - Excellent Read

Posted: 25 Nov 2010, 08:22
by T.M.K
Glyn Leach wrote:
Buncey wrote:The New York gig was the famous non-fight...one pregnant boxer, Duran in a foul mood and Holyfield's man with a disease...fight off. But, we got our unique press passes...all offers accepted for the laminate which is still in a brown envelope. Money will go to buying GL flowers and grapes.
By the way, BBC London 94.9 tonight (Thurs) at 8pm for an hour with an all-star cast of thousands.

Adios.
Holyfield-Akinwande! Christ that was a depressing trip.
Which is why you got drunk, thus making the injury occur...... so we can actually blame Big Henry for you breaking a bone? At least he caused some hurt that weekend then :wink:

Col :lol:

Re: Boxing Monthly - Excellent Read

Posted: 25 Nov 2010, 08:25
by Glyn Leach
Actually I think 'the incident' happened before the cancellation Col. Must have been jetlag :wink:

Re: Boxing Monthly - Excellent Read

Posted: 25 Nov 2010, 08:34
by T.M.K
Glyn Leach wrote:Actually I think 'the incident' happened before the cancellation Col. Must have been jetlag :wink:
Ah - so the hepatitis was all a smoke-screen! :roll: King Henry didn't wish to fight without the number one editor feeling fully fit :box:

If only your princess had been there to help you out of the cab huh? :lol:

Colski

Re: Boxing Monthly - Excellent Read

Posted: 25 Nov 2010, 11:54
by princess
J wrote::OhYes: u coudl go visit him in hospital Jane...he wont be able to run away...sorry Glyn :DDD
Ha ive already got the bed next to him booked :TU:

Re: Boxing Monthly - Excellent Read

Posted: 25 Nov 2010, 11:56
by princess
T.M.K wrote:
Glyn Leach wrote:Actually I think 'the incident' happened before the cancellation Col. Must have been jetlag :wink:
Ah - so the hepatitis was all a smoke-screen! :roll: King Henry didn't wish to fight without the number one editor feeling fully fit :box:

If only your princess had been there to help you out of the cab huh? :lol:

Colski
If id have been there it wouldnt have been a cab he was falling out of :DDD

Re: Boxing Monthly - Excellent Read

Posted: 25 Nov 2010, 16:27
by Final round
princess wrote:
T.M.K wrote:
Glyn Leach wrote:Actually I think 'the incident' happened before the cancellation Col. Must have been jetlag :wink:
Ah - so the hepatitis was all a smoke-screen! :roll: King Henry didn't wish to fight without the number one editor feeling fully fit :box:

If only your princess had been there to help you out of the cab huh? :lol:

Colski
If id have been there it wouldnt have been a cab he was falling out of :DDD

:oo You should get a job writing letters for porn magazines...if they still exist anymore

Re: Boxing Monthly - Excellent Read

Posted: 25 Nov 2010, 16:36
by -KOKid-
I agree, a very good issue out this month.
The jouralism is head and shoulders above whatever can be found on the net.

I was also very excited about Adam Smith becoming boxing boss at Sky.
That can only be good, and I feel it's important that the TV executives that have influence also have passion for the sport.
That is a recipe for success.

Keep up the good work BM!

Re: Boxing Monthly - Excellent Read

Posted: 25 Nov 2010, 17:46
by princess
Final round wrote:
princess wrote:
T.M.K wrote: Ah - so the hepatitis was all a smoke-screen! :roll: King Henry didn't wish to fight without the number one editor feeling fully fit :box:

If only your princess had been there to help you out of the cab huh? :lol:

Colski
If id have been there it wouldnt have been a cab he was falling out of :DDD

:oo You should get a job writing letters for porn magazines...if they still exist anymore
I thought boxing monthly was a porn mag ? Oh dear i think i,m on the wrong forum sorry guys :(

Re: Boxing Monthly - Excellent Read

Posted: 25 Nov 2010, 18:07
by Final round
princess wrote:
Final round wrote:
princess wrote: If id have been there it wouldnt have been a cab he was falling out of :DDD

:oo You should get a job writing letters for porn magazines...if they still exist anymore
I thought boxing monthly was a porn mag ? Oh dear i think i,m on the wrong forum sorry guys :(
:lol: What you talkin' about ? sweaty half naked muscled..... :oo that's it I'm not buying another issue again!

Re: Boxing Monthly - Excellent Read

Posted: 25 Nov 2010, 19:17
by princess
Final round wrote:
princess wrote:
Final round wrote:
:oo You should get a job writing letters for porn magazines...if they still exist anymore
I thought boxing monthly was a porn mag ? Oh dear i think i,m on the wrong forum sorry guys :(


:lol: What you talkin' about ? sweaty half naked muscled..... :oo that's it I'm not buying another issue again!
I swear i really thought it was. I Really didnt get why you men buy it I thought it was defo a womans mag Ha But now at least that confirms the rumour Glyn leach is Gay Sweatty muscled men !!! You know what I mean Colski :lol: I did see him at at punk gig in the early ninetys but maybe that was a cover He was trying to get Charlie Harper autograph and Charlie defo swings both ways If anyone doesnt know who Charlie is Lead singer from UK Subs Punk is my other passion x