BoxRec

Buncey wrote:OK...history lesson ladies:
Foreman got it wrong in Zaire. In the years that followed he chased Ali and took out full page adverts in New York Times and other papers and was the subject of a front page at Boxing News begging Ali for a rematch. Ali was busy with Dunne, Spaniards and stuff like!
Lewis and Tyson was late by five or six or seven years. Lewis and Holyfield was late. And, Bowe not fighting Lewis or Lewis not fighting Bowe was bigger at the time than Haye and Klitschkos making excuses, trust me.
You need to read contemporary newspaper reports - try my stuff in the Daily Telegraph for Lewis.
Stander...you serious?
It's been a long time on here since I had to talk to such a effing dimwit.
Now eff off and look up some papers and get an education you tosser.


Adios.

J wrote:As said i dont think its fair to put buncey and hart in the same bracket.

lefty wrote:

Carlos-Wigan wrote:

Captain Hook wrote:I know...he's stuck in the Ali era, the bloke hasn't a clue about anyone from 1980 onwards

In 20 years from now, that will be Steve Bunce!

ahh man bunce,personally the guy irritates the hell out of me!I find him entertaining in short bursts but after that he just gets annoying *in my opinion*

Buncey wrote: It's been a long time on here since I had to talk to such a effing dimwit.
Now eff off and look up some papers and get an education you tosser.


Adios.

Hagler2002 wrote:

Buncey wrote: It's been a long time on here since I had to talk to such a effing dimwit.
Now eff off and look up some papers and get an education you tosser.


Adios.

Classy

Buncey wrote:OK...history lesson ladies:
Foreman got it wrong in Zaire. ...
It's been a long time on here since I had to talk to such a effing dimwit.
Now eff off and look up some papers and get an education you tosser.


Adios.

Final round wrote:Funny thread, next thing you know all the wannabe 'boxing writers' will be digging out offensive bunce clips and posts and sending them to all the sports papers...how dare you employ such a rude opinionated man, he really upset me and I had to go and have a lie down etc....

Dioufy wrote:I agree, Stander wouldn't be a champ, but come on, dude. You don't have to settle for petty, and quite embarressing name-calling. Like someone said, you pimp your BBC slot out on here, yet bite the hand that feeds you. To resort to such silly retorts I thought was beyond a man like yourself.

Scottrf wrote:'People start crying'. Seems to me that it was you that flew off the handle when someone dared to question you. Cut the crap Buncey, you know your boxing but it doesn't mean your opinion rules over all. If that's how you are thinking then don't bother coming on here.

Everyone wants a rematch if they lose, you're supposed to win first time. I wasn't aware that calling for a rematch entitled you to one.

Scottrf wrote:Nothing to do with 'nice' it's having respect, so don't tell me to grow a pair. I've not once resorted to name calling in years of posting on forums, there's no need for it especially from a position of authority. If your opinions are valid or you come up with a good case you don't need to get personal, it's for the people who can't win an argument to do that. I've been a big fan of Bunce, I just think he's better than that.

Final round wrote:

Dioufy wrote:I agree, Stander wouldn't be a champ, but come on, dude. You don't have to settle for petty, and quite embarressing name-calling. Like someone said, you pimp your BBC slot out on here, yet bite the hand that feeds you. To resort to such silly retorts I thought was beyond a man like yourself.

Bite the hands that feed you... that's pretty bloody patronising.

Dioufy wrote:

Final round wrote:

Dioufy wrote:I agree, Stander wouldn't be a champ, but come on, dude. You don't have to settle for petty, and quite embarressing name-calling. Like someone said, you pimp your BBC slot out on here, yet bite the hand that feeds you. To resort to such silly retorts I thought was beyond a man like yourself.

Bite the hands that feed you... that's pretty bloody patronising.

How am I being patronising? It's clear fact. He comes on here plugging his BBC spot left, right and centre, and rightly so, but when someone disagrees with him and he reacts like that it's not going to do him many favours. I look forward to Buncey posting, but that post was bang out of order.