BIG LARRY VS BIG JOHN

damianhucker1
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3071
Joined: 20 Sep 2008, 17:36

Re: BIG LARRY VS BIG JOHN

Post by damianhucker1 »

Gutted for larry , but to be honest he looked all over the place before Mcdermott landed anything , dont know what to say , im shocked by that , as soon as he was rocking he didnt know what to do and to be honest the ref could have stopped it at the first knockdown
SOUTHPAW
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 331
Joined: 24 Jun 2008, 17:40

Re: BIG LARRY VS BIG JOHN

Post by SOUTHPAW »

Good for john....larry looked the part but its over for him now..
whicker
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4550
Joined: 01 Jan 2008, 01:52

Re: BIG LARRY VS BIG JOHN

Post by whicker »

Wow! That was quick- one of those fights you don't want either man to lose, really- both seem like decent blokes.
Srebmun
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1358
Joined: 20 Nov 2008, 10:23

Re: BIG LARRY VS BIG JOHN

Post by Srebmun »

whicker wrote:Wow! That was quick- one of those fights you don't want either man to lose, really- both seem like decent blokes.
Even on delay it was quick.
damianhucker1
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3071
Joined: 20 Sep 2008, 17:36

Re: BIG LARRY VS BIG JOHN

Post by damianhucker1 »

Dont know where Larry goes from here to be honest , he will need a couple of easier ones and then maybe have another go at stepping up .
MightyWarrior
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13248
Joined: 23 Jan 2003, 14:01

Re: BIG LARRY VS BIG JOHN

Post by MightyWarrior »

It's a CRUEL sport. That was brutal. INCOMPETENT referee, if he though Larry was ok after getting up blankly after that 1st KD, then he's obviously a bit thick.
lefty
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: BIG LARRY VS BIG JOHN

Post by lefty »

damianhucker1 wrote:Dont know where Larry goes from here to be honest , he will need a couple of easier ones and then maybe have another go at stepping up .
He needs to work on his boxing skills,if he does that then i think he can become a british champion still
thepocketrocket
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3283
Joined: 16 Jan 2003, 06:26

Re: BIG LARRY VS BIG JOHN

Post by thepocketrocket »

Big John was always going to be a huge step up for Larry and was basically a 'sink or swim' fight from Mr Warren...unfortunately he sank....

Does make you wonder whether Mr Maloney would have given him a steadier rise in the quality of his opposition?
whicker
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4550
Joined: 01 Jan 2008, 01:52

Re: BIG LARRY VS BIG JOHN

Post by whicker »

MightyWarrior wrote:It's a CRUEL sport. That was brutal. INCOMPETENT referee, if he though Larry was ok after getting up blankly after that 1st KD, then he's obviously a bit thick.
Well, he does need to give the fighter a chance. Possible Larry could have held and recovered- OK, it wasn't to be- but then, it's easy to be wise after the event.
bfchunk
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 884
Joined: 28 Sep 2009, 15:39

Re: BIG LARRY VS BIG JOHN

Post by bfchunk »

Been stung too many times myself. It was the fairly safe bet comment I responded to.
m1kee50
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4518
Joined: 04 Sep 2006, 11:07

Re: BIG LARRY VS BIG JOHN

Post by m1kee50 »

Shame. Larry protested but you saw his legs going... Anyone can get jumped on - ask big john himself... Hopefully larry can get back into the mix but its a giant step backwards.
black panther
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4089
Joined: 11 Dec 2003, 07:06

Re: BIG LARRY VS BIG JOHN

Post by black panther »

Gutted for Larry but I hope he comes back from this. He's never going to be the best technically but if he developed a good strong jab to work his way in I still think he can do okay at domestic level. I thought McDermott would fold mentally under pressure....shows what I know! :oops:
steve689
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9651
Joined: 20 Jan 2003, 13:50

Re: BIG LARRY VS BIG JOHN

Post by steve689 »

Larry just looked a bit raw and open in there. Hard to see where the big lad goes from here because it was basic 1-2 punches from McDermott that did him.
FtmPress
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 585
Joined: 26 Aug 2008, 07:45

Re: BIG LARRY VS BIG JOHN

Post by FtmPress »

Dioufy wrote:It's hard to rule out McDermott because he#s done fairly well when he's looked awful, but this looks doubly bad for him. I don't think I've seen him in much worse shape. Larry to dominate him, for an early KO.
You should not judge a book by is cover, John was in great shape for this fight, And the win proved it.
FtmPress
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 585
Joined: 26 Aug 2008, 07:45

Re: BIG LARRY VS BIG JOHN

Post by FtmPress »

Old bones Ian wrote:
Dioufy wrote:It's hard to rule out McDermott because he#s done fairly well when he's looked awful, but this looks doubly bad for him. I don't think I've seen him in much worse shape. Larry to dominate him, for an early KO.
I'd go along with that
You should not judge a book by is cover, John was in great shape for this fight, And the win proved it.
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22331
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: BIG LARRY VS BIG JOHN

Post by Horse »

FtmPress wrote:You should not judge a book by is cover, John was in great shape for this fight, And the win proved it.
Will it be McDermott vs Price next?
Srebmun
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1358
Joined: 20 Nov 2008, 10:23

Re: BIG LARRY VS BIG JOHN

Post by Srebmun »

FtmPress wrote:
Old bones Ian wrote:
Dioufy wrote:It's hard to rule out McDermott because he#s done fairly well when he's looked awful, but this looks doubly bad for him. I don't think I've seen him in much worse shape. Larry to dominate him, for an early KO.
I'd go along with that
You should not judge a book by is cover, John was in great shape for this fight, And the win proved it.
No it didn't, it lasted 1 minute, proves nothing 'cept Larry wasn't up for it.
jBacca
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5563
Joined: 14 Sep 2008, 17:40

Re: BIG LARRY VS BIG JOHN

Post by jBacca »

FtmPress wrote:
Old bones Ian wrote:
Dioufy wrote:It's hard to rule out McDermott because he#s done fairly well when he's looked awful, but this looks doubly bad for him. I don't think I've seen him in much worse shape. Larry to dominate him, for an early KO.
I'd go along with that
You should not judge a book by is cover, John was in great shape for this fight, And the win proved it.
Wouldn't say that Frank, it only last a min or two. The win proved to me that Larry isn't good enough, not necessarily that McDermott was in great condition.
thepocketrocket
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3283
Joined: 16 Jan 2003, 06:26

Re: BIG LARRY VS BIG JOHN

Post by thepocketrocket »

Mcdermott has always had high work rate for a heavy....he always looks fat and out of condition but he has the output
FtmPress
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 585
Joined: 26 Aug 2008, 07:45

Re: BIG LARRY VS BIG JOHN

Post by FtmPress »

jBacca wrote:
FtmPress wrote:
Old bones Ian wrote: I'd go along with that
You should not judge a book by is cover, John was in great shape for this fight, And the win proved it.
Wouldn't say that Frank, it only last a min or two. The win proved to me that Larry isn't good enough, not necessarily that McDermott was in great condition.
It lasted that lone because john took him apart with his jab right from the start, Sorry to say Larry had no answer to john's jab or pace. Before this fight a lot of you on here was claiming how Larry was going to do great things in the heavyweight division, So now please give john the credit for this win not come on here saying Larry no good.
Dioufy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7351
Joined: 16 Sep 2006, 23:09

Re: BIG LARRY VS BIG JOHN

Post by Dioufy »

FtmPress wrote:
Dioufy wrote:It's hard to rule out McDermott because he#s done fairly well when he's looked awful, but this looks doubly bad for him. I don't think I've seen him in much worse shape. Larry to dominate him, for an early KO.
You should not judge a book by is cover, John was in great shape for this fight, And the win proved it.
McDermott proved me wrong, sadly so.
leforge
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7790
Joined: 04 Mar 2005, 12:44

Re: BIG LARRY VS BIG JOHN

Post by leforge »

FtmPress wrote:
jBacca wrote:
FtmPress wrote: You should not judge a book by is cover, John was in great shape for this fight, And the win proved it.
Wouldn't say that Frank, it only last a min or two. The win proved to me that Larry isn't good enough, not necessarily that McDermott was in great condition.
It lasted that lone because john took him apart with his jab right from the start, Sorry to say Larry had no answer to john's jab or pace. Before this fight a lot of you on here was claiming how Larry was going to do great things in the heavyweight division, So now please give john the credit for this win not come on here saying Larry no good.
John did very well. Would like to see him fight Fury again!
Jeff Thomas
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3016
Joined: 30 Apr 2009, 06:32

Re: BIG LARRY VS BIG JOHN

Post by Jeff Thomas »

Mcdermot price??
rhino222
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6612
Joined: 09 Sep 2005, 09:38

Re: BIG LARRY VS BIG JOHN

Post by rhino222 »

FtmPress wrote:
Old bones Ian wrote:
Dioufy wrote:It's hard to rule out McDermott because he#s done fairly well when he's looked awful, but this looks doubly bad for him. I don't think I've seen him in much worse shape. Larry to dominate him, for an early KO.
I'd go along with that
You should not judge a book by is cover, John was in great shape for this fight, And the win proved it.
come on frank, he is no way in 'great shape'. john is a sound technician with decent skills who does the basic things well. obviously getting up and going out running is not one of them. i am not knocking johns performance tonight, he did what he had to do and did it very well, as the underdog he was composed and utilised his assets in finding out larrys weaknesses, when larry throws his bombs, then big john capitalised.

someone wrote a few years ago that big john does the 100m in 11 seconds, if thats the case i will bear my arse in woolies window alongside bernie slaven, infact ill suck him off !!!.... live on boxrec.

put macdermott on a fitness campaign with jimmy mac for 3 months, then we might see him develop even a resemblance of physique. big john is doing very well DESPITE the shape he is in and not because of it, its his own fault he is not british champion, not the fault of any judge etc. john needs to knuckle down, work in the gym and on the road, then he could progress to british championship level, at the moment john is a gatekeeper for the british heavyweight title, nothing more, nothing less.
lefty
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: BIG LARRY VS BIG JOHN

Post by lefty »

FtmPress wrote:
jBacca wrote:
FtmPress wrote: You should not judge a book by is cover, John was in great shape for this fight, And the win proved it.
Wouldn't say that Frank, it only last a min or two. The win proved to me that Larry isn't good enough, not necessarily that McDermott was in great condition.
It lasted that lone because john took him apart with his jab right from the start, Sorry to say Larry had no answer to john's jab or pace. Before this fight a lot of you on here was claiming how Larry was going to do great things in the heavyweight division, So now please give john the credit for this win not come on here saying Larry no good.
http://boxrec.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=9&t=133435 If you look at this thread frank you'll see what i said about larry
Post Reply