Page 2 of 2
Re: Fighters who are much better than their record suggests
Posted: 08 Mar 2011, 17:42
by Des1
Mickey Coveney (10-12) is alot better than what his record reads
Re: Fighters who are much better than their record suggests
Posted: 08 Mar 2011, 18:05
by 1southpaw
WHAT ABOUT OUR VERY OWN JOHNNY GREAVES

Re: Fighters who are much better than their record suggests
Posted: 08 Mar 2011, 18:15
by Kit
Patrick Mendy, Michael Banbula, Mounir Guebbas, Freddie Pendleton and Maurice Harris.
Re: Fighters who are much better than their record suggests
Posted: 08 Mar 2011, 18:32
by Finch
sugar sweet 1 wrote:DavidPayne wrote:Bradley Pryce.
Fed to the wolves at times by FW, fought regularly above his optimum weight and had classic dust-ups with several good fighters.
I think with more care and obviously more dedication from Pryce he could have been European Champion.
could have???????im not finished yet,lol.going back to light-middle to make a impact
You're going up and down like a whores drawers.
Lose at LM and you'll say you're going back down to WW again.
Re: Fighters who are much better than their record suggests
Posted: 08 Mar 2011, 18:37
by CEO_Hoodlem
Rocky dean! He has fought the top lads from bantam to super feather! Hes also had a few bad decision go agaist him!
Re: Fighters who are much better than their record suggests
Posted: 08 Mar 2011, 19:13
by Tko1980
Patrick mendy and Paul David !! ?
Re: Fighters who are much better than their record suggests
Posted: 08 Mar 2011, 20:41
by brian13
John Simpson is the only one that really sticks out.
Re: Fighters who are much better than their record suggests
Posted: 09 Mar 2011, 02:40
by johnnygreaves
1southpaw wrote:WHAT ABOUT OUR VERY OWN JOHNNY GREAVES

thanks for the mention. Covenny is good. Spar with him and he's a good lad.
Re: Fighters who are much better than their record suggests
Posted: 09 Mar 2011, 03:45
by Russ L
Gary Reid is the name that always leaps to my mind when I think about this.
Re: Fighters who are much better than their record suggests
Posted: 09 Mar 2011, 03:52
by Shirow
Youssef Al Hamidi leaps to mine. 8-30-2
Re: Fighters who are much better than their record suggests
Posted: 09 Mar 2011, 04:21
by Tommy Gunn13
CEO_Hoodlem wrote:Rocky dean! He has fought the top lads from bantam to super feather! Hes also had a few bad decision go agaist him!
Has Rocky retired now?
Re: Fighters who are much better than their record suggests
Posted: 09 Mar 2011, 04:33
by sugar sweet 1
Finch wrote:sugar sweet 1 wrote:DavidPayne wrote:Bradley Pryce.
Fed to the wolves at times by FW, fought regularly above his optimum weight and had classic dust-ups with several good fighters.
I think with more care and obviously more dedication from Pryce he could have been European Champion.
could have???????im not finished yet,lol.going back to light-middle to make a impact
You're going up and down like a whores drawers.
Lose at LM and you'll say you're going back down to WW again.
no prob say middle or super middle,lol.
Re: Fighters who are much better than their record suggests
Posted: 09 Mar 2011, 06:20
by Davieboy
Gazmac81 wrote:John simpson too
fearce wrote:ian nappa his better then his record sugests hes been robed alot
Simpson was the first fighter I thought of when I saw this thread. Has had a few dodgy decisions go against him in his time, but is a quality fighter
Re: Fighters who are much better than their record suggests
Posted: 09 Mar 2011, 07:07
by CEO_Hoodlem
Tommy Gunn13 wrote:CEO_Hoodlem wrote:Rocky dean! He has fought the top lads from bantam to super feather! Hes also had a few bad decision go agaist him!
Has Rocky retired now?
Yes mate hes had enough!
Re: Fighters who are much better than their record suggests
Posted: 09 Mar 2011, 08:43
by Podmore_Birmingham
jonp wrote:Andrew Patterson and D mitchell are two i know personally.
Bioth much better than records show
D is quality, always thought it.
Re: Fighters who are much better than their record suggests
Posted: 09 Mar 2011, 13:37
by Brit Ryan
Alex Spitko
Re: Fighters who are much better than their record suggests
Posted: 09 Mar 2011, 14:31
by Old bones Ian
CEO_Hoodlem wrote:Tommy Gunn13 wrote:CEO_Hoodlem wrote:Rocky dean! He has fought the top lads from bantam to super feather! Hes also had a few bad decision go agaist him!
Has Rocky retired now?
Yes mate hes had enough!
Rocky was a good fighter, always entertainment
Re: Fighters who are much better than their record suggests
Posted: 09 Mar 2011, 14:38
by Old bones Ian
Boxers like Lou Gent, Michael Sprott, Hussain Osman and Sven Hamer spring to mind. They had alot of losses on their records, but if their opponent puts a foot wrong then it can be goodnight for them.
Re: Fighters who are much better than their record suggests
Posted: 09 Mar 2011, 14:40
by Yes We Can
Chambers2 wrote:deadpan wrote:Emanuel Augustus 38-34-6.
He was the one that immediately sprung to mine.
Who was that Mcafferty bloke from Kettering who fought a load of our top HWs?? Don't remember him winning (m)any matches, but always put on a good perfoemance and rarely got stopped.
Just looked him up Derek McCafferty 2(1)-17(5)-1
http://boxrec.com/list_bouts.php?human_ ... &cat=boxer
Damn im ashamed, fom the same town and dont even know the guy
and its not even a big town, thanks for the heads up on that record!!!
the hunt is on!
Re: Fighters who are much better than their record suggests
Posted: 09 Mar 2011, 18:22
by Des1
Yes, as someone has mentioned, Johnny Greaves is far better than his record. On one of his rare wins he was moving back onto the ropes and pulled out a cracker of a punch to score a KO, he didn't intend to ko the bloke and it p*ssed him off because that was the longest he didn't get work after that! He more than holds his own in sparring with top prospects and championship fighters and you get the feeling that in some of his fights if he turned it on a little he would walk away with more wins, but of course he wouldn't get the work and bills need paying.
Re: Fighters who are much better than their record suggests
Posted: 09 Mar 2011, 18:56
by 1southpaw
Des1 wrote:Yes, as someone has mentioned, Johnny Greaves is far better than his record. On one of his rare wins he was moving back onto the ropes and pulled out a cracker of a punch to score a KO, he didn't intend to ko the bloke and it p*ssed him off because that was the longest he didn't get work after that! He more than holds his own in sparring with top prospects and championship fighters and you get the feeling that in some of his fights if he turned it on a little he would walk away with more wins, but of course he wouldn't get the work and bills need paying.
i always said that if he wanted he could win a british title at super feather he was good enough
Re: Fighters who are much better than their record suggests
Posted: 10 Mar 2011, 02:52
by johnnygreaves
I'll be honest. I've never really took the game serious enough . That's a big regret. That said I earn well doing as I am. But I do realise that these lads are at times beatable , but up to my last fight I've enjoyed being the clown and taking the lads all the way . I love my job Simplest