Page 2 of 2
Re: Macklin vs Gevor
Posted: 16 Mar 2011, 10:21
by THEBUTCH
The undercard doesn't tempt me at all, no way will I be buying this one.
Macklin should have boxed Barker. A much higher profile fight than what he's ended up with.
Re: Macklin vs Gevor
Posted: 16 Mar 2011, 10:33
by Glyn Leach
Probably not in world terms Butch, Barker is around the same level as Macklin — it would be a good fight, don't get me wrong, but Macklin seems to be looking up rather than sideways at the moment.
Re: Macklin vs Gevor
Posted: 17 Mar 2011, 17:14
by stevek3lly
People keep getting on Macklins back, but people have to realise the only winner in taking a fight against Barker or Murray now is just the british viewers. I would love to see either fight made but it serves no use to Macklin at the moment. I say get behind him and hope he wins a title soon, then think of all the domestic battles that will come from that.
Come on Matthew, I am behind you fella. Put on a show and get more people back on side.
Re: Macklin vs Gevor
Posted: 18 Mar 2011, 05:40
by Re-up Gang
Asterix wrote:Gevor's a good fighter. I had him beating Sturm, and he gave Abraham problems until he got knocked out. It should be a good fight. I wonder if the Sartison result was fair?
Ghevor moved up to super middle for that fight, strangely. anyway sartison boxed well and won it fair.
sartison is a decent fighter whom also gave kessler problems before getting stopped late.
Ghevor will definitely trouble macklin heavily if the varon fight is anyhing to go by as to where macklin stands right now.