Page 2 of 3
Re: Macklin/Gevor - Off?
Posted: 31 Mar 2011, 11:15
by iwz678
it looks well short of ppv now with macklin v gevor and crolla v rees off, but we might still see crolla and munroe has been added to the bill. Watson v Purdy will be good and still good to have a look at upcoming guys like Murray and Quigg.
Berto v Oritz on same night, both have been on Sky in recent fights, any chance Sky will get that?
Re: Macklin/Gevor - Off?
Posted: 31 Mar 2011, 11:21
by DavidPayne
Dodson was offered this fight too.
WBA 168 - I know they have seven champions in this division - the WBA this is, so can't be arsed to look up who it is.
Re: Macklin/Gevor - Off?
Posted: 31 Mar 2011, 11:26
by leforge
iwz678 wrote:it looks well short of ppv now with macklin v gevor and crolla v rees off, but we might still see crolla and munroe has been added to the bill. Watson v Purdy will be good and still good to have a look at upcoming guys like Murray and Quigg.
Berto v Oritz on same night, both have been on Sky in recent fights, any chance Sky will get that?
No its shit bill. Crolla is off the bill according to boxing news. Munroe going to have a wba inter title fight too.
Re: Macklin/Gevor - Off?
Posted: 31 Mar 2011, 11:30
by lefty
DavidPayne wrote:Dodson was offered this fight too.
WBA 168 - I know they have seven champions in this division - the WBA this is, so can't be arsed to look up who it is.
Offered what fight?!Now im confused.
Re: Macklin/Gevor - Off?
Posted: 31 Mar 2011, 11:41
by DavidPayne
lefty wrote:DavidPayne wrote:Dodson was offered this fight too.
WBA 168 - I know they have seven champions in this division - the WBA this is, so can't be arsed to look up who it is.
Offered what fight?!Now im confused.
A WBA title fight in 10 days.
Re: Macklin/Gevor - Off?
Posted: 31 Mar 2011, 11:44
by lefty
DavidPayne wrote:lefty wrote:DavidPayne wrote:Dodson was offered this fight too.
WBA 168 - I know they have seven champions in this division - the WBA this is, so can't be arsed to look up who it is.
Offered what fight?!Now im confused.
A WBA title fight in 10 days.
Are you talking macklin here though?!If so I would of thought Macklin would of competed for a title at middle not super-middle.Aside from that the WBA regular champion is dimitri sartison who i thought was fighting a unification bout against stieglitz.
Re: Macklin/Gevor - Off?
Posted: 31 Mar 2011, 12:50
by palooka
iwz678 wrote:it looks well short of ppv now with macklin v gevor and crolla v rees off, but we might still see crolla and munroe has been added to the bill. Watson v Purdy will be good and still good to have a look at upcoming guys like Murray and Quigg.
Berto v Oritz on same night, both have been on Sky in recent fights, any chance Sky will get that?
There're some interesting bouts there and there may be some drama; not 15 quid worth though :(
Re: Macklin/Gevor - Off?
Posted: 31 Mar 2011, 14:33
by leforge
Think macklin not fighting had something do with hattons as sun says contractural problems!
Re: Macklin/Gevor - Off?
Posted: 31 Mar 2011, 16:02
by iwz678
if it was something with hattons why even bother announcing him?
this was supposed to be an eliminator for wba, but n'dam n'jikam has an interim wba title as well and is defending it saturday, the thing is ridiculous.
Re: Macklin/Gevor - Off?
Posted: 31 Mar 2011, 16:08
by GlobalBox
Quigg's off the bill now as well apparently. Dropping like flies
Re: Macklin/Gevor - Off?
Posted: 31 Mar 2011, 16:45
by leforge
GLOBALBOX wrote:Quigg's off the bill now as well apparently. Dropping like flies
This is now a shit bill!
Re: Macklin/Gevor - Off?
Posted: 31 Mar 2011, 16:47
by Camcas
Are all these guys actually off the bill or are people just saying they are
Re: Macklin/Gevor - Off?
Posted: 31 Mar 2011, 16:53
by leforge
Camcas wrote:Are all these guys actually off the bill or are people just saying they are
Macklin off contractual problems. Crolla does not want to fight wright. Quigg injured hand.
Re: Macklin/Gevor - Off?
Posted: 31 Mar 2011, 19:24
by whiskey
maybe macklin has a shot at last ?
Re: Macklin/Gevor - Off?
Posted: 01 Apr 2011, 03:42
by stujones
Dodson was offered a WBA title shot???? Which Dodson????
Re: Macklin/Gevor - Off?
Posted: 01 Apr 2011, 03:43
by lefty
stujones wrote:Dodson was offered a WBA title shot???? Which Dodson????
Im with you,im bloody confused lol
Re: Macklin/Gevor - Off?
Posted: 01 Apr 2011, 03:51
by Josh1111
If all this is true, what a shit undercard.
But, nothing has been announced yet so lets wait
Re: Macklin/Gevor - Off?
Posted: 01 Apr 2011, 04:01
by DavidPayne
lefty wrote:stujones wrote:Dodson was offered a WBA title shot???? Which Dodson????
Im with you,im bloody confused lol
Sorry girls. It was Tony Dodson...and I wasn't thinking straight, i.e. neglected to notice the obvious fact that Macklin is at 160.
Re: Macklin/Gevor - Off?
Posted: 01 Apr 2011, 04:02
by lefty
DavidPayne wrote:lefty wrote:stujones wrote:Dodson was offered a WBA title shot???? Which Dodson????
Im with you,im bloody confused lol
Sorry girls. It was Tony Dodson...and I wasn't thinking straight, i.e. neglected to notice the obvious fact that Macklin is at 160.
Fair enough :)
Re: Macklin/Gevor - Off?
Posted: 01 Apr 2011, 04:07
by stujones
Tony Dodson was offered a shot at the WBA Super Middleweight title???? When, who was champion - and why didn't he take it.
Re: Macklin/Gevor - Off?
Posted: 01 Apr 2011, 04:09
by DavidPayne
stujones wrote:Tony Dodson was offered a shot at the WBA Super Middleweight title???? When, who was champion - and why didn't he take it.
He was offered it in the last 48 hours - he cant make 168 pounds without having an operation.
Re: Macklin/Gevor - Off?
Posted: 01 Apr 2011, 04:19
by lefty
DavidPayne wrote:stujones wrote:Tony Dodson was offered a shot at the WBA Super Middleweight title???? When, who was champion - and why didn't he take it.
He was offered it in the last 48 hours - he cant make 168 pounds without having an operation.
I dont understand that because sartison who is the regular WBA champion is supposed to be fighting Stieglitz in a unification fight so that makes no sense
Re: Macklin/Gevor - Off?
Posted: 01 Apr 2011, 04:28
by stujones
lefty wrote:DavidPayne wrote:stujones wrote:Tony Dodson was offered a shot at the WBA Super Middleweight title???? When, who was champion - and why didn't he take it.
He was offered it in the last 48 hours - he cant make 168 pounds without having an operation.
I dont understand that because sartison who is the regular WBA champion is supposed to be fighting Stieglitz in a unification fight so that makes no sense
Its just for the WBO title. Saritson has been stripped..... but didn't know this news about Dodson. I wonder if another Brit can get involved - Smith, Quigley, Kenny Anderson etc.
Re: Macklin/Gevor - Off?
Posted: 01 Apr 2011, 04:46
by DavidPayne
Follow Tony on Twitter.
He's a keen twit.
Re: Macklin/Gevor - Off?
Posted: 01 Apr 2011, 05:06
by lefty
stujones wrote:lefty wrote:DavidPayne wrote:
He was offered it in the last 48 hours - he cant make 168 pounds without having an operation.
I dont understand that because sartison who is the regular WBA champion is supposed to be fighting Stieglitz in a unification fight so that makes no sense
Its just for the WBO title. Saritson has been stripped..... but didn't know this news about Dodson. I wonder if another Brit can get involved - Smith, Quigley, Kenny Anderson etc.
Ah i didnt know that,cheers for clearing that up
