Page 2 of 2
Re: Kell Brook Free agent
Posted: 06 Apr 2011, 06:50
by Tomasino
Pugilist-specialist wrote:G0mez wrote:I prefer Craig Watson over Kell Brook myself.
He's got the better record too.
Especially if you ignore his 3 losses.
yes because unbeaten fighters are always better than those with losses, no matter the quality of opposition.
Re: Kell Brook Free agent
Posted: 06 Apr 2011, 08:20
by danfoster
are people seriously saying that craig watson would beat kell brook?
Re: Kell Brook Free agent
Posted: 06 Apr 2011, 09:07
by Pugilist-specialist
DaveBoyMorrison wrote:Pugilist-specialist wrote:G0mez wrote:I prefer Craig Watson over Kell Brook myself.
He's got the better record too.
Especially if you ignore his 3 losses.
yes because unbeaten fighters are always better than those with losses, no matter the quality of opposition.
I'm not saying that DaveBoy. But if you're comparing records Watson has been stopped and also lost to Fewkes and O'Donnell.
Re: Kell Brook Free agent
Posted: 06 Apr 2011, 10:54
by Tomasino
Pugilist-specialist wrote:DaveBoyMorrison wrote:Pugilist-specialist wrote:
Especially if you ignore his 3 losses.
yes because unbeaten fighters are always better than those with losses, no matter the quality of opposition.
I'm not saying that DaveBoy. But if you're comparing records Watson has been stopped and also lost to Fewkes and O'Donnell.
True, I picked a bad example to make my wee point mate.
Re: Kell Brook Free agent
Posted: 16 Apr 2011, 16:47
by Pugilist-specialist
G0mez wrote:I prefer Craig Watson over Kell Brook myself.
He's got the better record too.
Especially if you ignore his 4 losses.
Re: Kell Brook Free agent
Posted: 17 Apr 2011, 09:30
by Hotspurx
Pugilist-specialist wrote:G0mez wrote:I prefer Craig Watson over Kell Brook myself.
He's got the better record too.
Especially if you ignore his 4 losses.
Word
Re: Kell Brook Free agent
Posted: 17 Apr 2011, 09:47
by TheCobra
Hotspurx wrote:Pugilist-specialist wrote:G0mez wrote:I prefer Craig Watson over Kell Brook myself.
He's got the better record too.
Especially if you ignore his 4 losses.
Word
LMAO!!!
Re: Kell Brook Free agent
Posted: 17 Apr 2011, 09:54
by whiskey
cnuts !
true, it was a big shock last night though to be fair wasn't it.
Re: Kell Brook Free agent
Posted: 17 Apr 2011, 12:06
by Cas
brook has a field day with watson.. a perfect shot purdy landed, watson should of had it covered!
Re: Kell Brook Free agent
Posted: 17 Apr 2011, 17:17
by SexySouthPaw
DaveBoyMorrison wrote:Pugilist-specialist wrote:DaveBoyMorrison wrote:
yes because unbeaten fighters are always better than those with losses, no matter the quality of opposition.
I'm not saying that DaveBoy. But if you're comparing records Watson has been stopped and also lost to Fewkes and O'Donnell.
True, I picked a bad example to make my wee point mate.
Hmmmmmmm Lee Purdey how long would he last with Kell Brook ?
Re: Kell Brook Free agent
Posted: 18 Apr 2011, 14:22
by hoot
SexySouthPaw wrote:DaveBoyMorrison wrote:Pugilist-specialist wrote:
I'm not saying that DaveBoy. But if you're comparing records Watson has been stopped and also lost to Fewkes and O'Donnell.
True, I picked a bad example to make my wee point mate.
Hmmmmmmm Lee Purdey how long would he last with Kell Brook ?
I recon 3 rounds' unless kell chose to take him out in the first' different class.
Re: Kell Brook Free agent
Posted: 18 Jul 2011, 08:56
by Pugilist-specialist
G0mez wrote:I prefer Craig Watson over Kell Brook myself.
He's got the better record too.
Especially if you ignore his 5 losses.