BoxRec

kamicazze wrote:i totally agree. He does teach them how to be men rather than just boxers and that stands them in good stead in the ring. My criticism of the style is that i have never seen them come up with a plan b. However I always point to the fact that had Prince stayed with the ingles, then he wouldnt have suffered that Barrera loss. Many trainers train different styles nowadays so that their fighters are able to adapt. Cant knock the ingles, the style is revolutionary and many people i know have been up there for short training camps to incorporate some of the techniques into their own game.

I wouldn't say revolutionary u need to watch some old school fighters like willie pep or
Nicolino looche these are guys Brendan watched as well as many others but when u say they don't teach plan b ever thought the fighters don't execute plan b.. ? NaZ does not make brendan the best trainer because he schooled naz Brendan I's a great trainer and mentor because I's the key to all their success simple it's got nothing to do with naz.. You first said ingle I's one dimensional then u say they have no plan b what on performances that you have seen of late like junior witter.. Dominic trains junior maybe u should criticise him rather than brendan..

Have you trained there or something that you big the place up so much? i have watched Pep, i know about brendan being a motivational speaker. But name me a match where the fighter of ingle had to alter their gameplan? ive seen calzaghe do it many times.

no mate i aint bigging any1 from there and im not "bigging up" as u call it i have no reason to im telling u how it is brendan is proof in the pudding how do u know what the game plan is of a trainer or fighter to know they altered the "gameplan" each fighter trys to adapt to a certain fighter as rounds go by so i dont know what youre talking about.. they always have a plan b they tell the fighters to alter certain thengs do u not call that changing the game plan...