Re: Kell brook ,i ent on the hype train !!
Posted: 25 Jun 2011, 19:56
Yes. Not saying he's pound for pound or anything yet; but world class for suremrpedigree wrote:world class ??reggaereggae wrote:I thought he looked good
Yes. Not saying he's pound for pound or anything yet; but world class for suremrpedigree wrote:world class ??reggaereggae wrote:I thought he looked good
Point is that no-one has ever stopped the guy.Gray-Fox wrote:LOL @ comparing his win with the others...as if they were recent (well Alvarez's was but his style is never going to look as flashy as Brook's)
Completely agree. Would love the Hatton fight next but can't imagine them takin it ...DIRT SUGAR wrote:He did a job on a guy well beaten by all those guys who's 39 and got a lot of miles on the clock. What he needs now is to get in with someone like Hatton and stop him in style then take on a good American and get some momentum going, because that's what his career has lacked.... momentum and consistent progression. It's been stop and start but no excuses now, he's got to get back in their asap against a better opponent each time out. Simples!welshee wrote:Brook did a better job than Alvarez, Cotto, Witter & Malignaggi IMO. Where would you put his performance in comparison with theirs?mrpedigree wrote:world class ??
Yeah, i agree with your analysis. To use a football analogy, Kell moved last night from boxing lower league opponents to taking on a good, strong, upper championship team. He will have improved hugely frm the experience.bigB wrote:Dan I think what I put above pretty much summed it up.
Jon just dislikes the Ingle style so will always have a negative opinion.
Johnny Cucumber wrote:kell would win a European title but as for being world class he definitely isn't.
That was a real let down as he couldn't of picked a better time to fight Lovemore in his career.
As for G Mccrory saying that's the best job anyone has done on N'dou !!!!!!!
Is he crazy or does he just not do his homework ?
He needs to look no further than Kells stablemate Witter.
Witter boxed N'dou in his prime (2005)and at his correct weight and did a great job on him dumping him on his arse quite heavily about 2/3 times.
N'dou went to he'll and back in that fight and did unbelievably well to survive......
But then Malignaggi put him down in their first fight also.danfoster wrote:Point is that no-one has ever stopped the guy.Gray-Fox wrote:LOL @ comparing his win with the others...as if they were recent (well Alvarez's was but his style is never going to look as flashy as Brook's)
Shows just hard Junior Witter punches, by the way - last night it looked like it'd take a cannonball to have Lovemore off his feet!
Bit harsh mate!yid14 wrote:Brook reminds me of Jonny Nelson - must be a sheffield thing! He does what it takes to win and then for the last 2-3 rounds turns it on, boring though. He should try harder earlier, gave it the big one about doing it for his Sheffield fans and let's face it, didn't really put on a show.
danfoster wrote:. Jon, both of your sentences above made me laugh! Hope you enjoyed the fight mateJon Saxon wrote:Sorry mate you heard it on here first from me, ask DanGray-Fox wrote:Kell's defence is his reflexes, and that will be his downfall.
Remember where you heard it first.
Sadly the kid aint got it, anyone can see that.
Never said you didn't mate!Jon Saxon wrote:danfoster wrote:. Jon, both of your sentences above made me laugh! Hope you enjoyed the fight mateJon Saxon wrote: Sorry mate you heard it on here first from me, ask Dan
Sadly the kid aint got it, anyone can see that.
I sort of did Dan but I would have rather he was in with a live dog and tbh I didnt enjoy it (and yet and old carthorse still landed waaaaaaay to much on him btw) as much as the Macklin fight.
For the record I have quite a few friends in your city.
Really, I watched it and it was pretty dull.leforge wrote:Bit harsh mate!yid14 wrote:Brook reminds me of Jonny Nelson - must be a sheffield thing! He does what it takes to win and then for the last 2-3 rounds turns it on, boring though. He should try harder earlier, gave it the big one about doing it for his Sheffield fans and let's face it, didn't really put on a show.
I was smashed when watching it at 2 last night so need to watch againyid14 wrote:Really, I watched it and it was pretty dull.leforge wrote:Bit harsh mate!yid14 wrote:Brook reminds me of Jonny Nelson - must be a sheffield thing! He does what it takes to win and then for the last 2-3 rounds turns it on, boring though. He should try harder earlier, gave it the big one about doing it for his Sheffield fans and let's face it, didn't really put on a show.
Especially when the Macklin fight was straight after.
don't bother - watch the macklin-sturm fight. Let me know who you think won.leforge wrote:I was smashed when watching it at 2 last night so need to watch againyid14 wrote:Really, I watched it and it was pretty dull.leforge wrote: Bit harsh mate!
Especially when the Macklin fight was straight after.
I saw that this afternoon thought Macklin just won.yid14 wrote:don't bother - watch the macklin-sturm fight. Let me know who you think won.leforge wrote:I was smashed when watching it at 2 last night so need to watch againyid14 wrote: Really, I watched it and it was pretty dull.
Especially when the Macklin fight was straight after.
I agree with this Ian, remember watching him at magna vs thorpe i think? and was suprised at how often he got tagged and in the ams vs John Fewkes. I think its lazy writing for people to call him 'typical Ingle' fighter. Although he's no slouch in the reflex/footwork dept he is very much a front foot counter puncher.Ian 'Mr' McNeilly wrote:I've said it all along. Kell's got most of the attributes you need to go far but he gets hit too often for me. Always has done.
Then again, so does Carl Froch and he isn't doing badly. I'd just like to see Kell tighten up this one aspect but it was a good performance against a really tough bastard.