Page 2 of 2
Re: Mitchell v Katsidas part 2
Posted: 19 Jul 2011, 09:06
by earsjohn
Datsue wrote:I think earsjohn had it right over on the Current Scene -- Marquez's WBO title is being vacated, & Burns is going to have to fight someone tasty if he stays at superfeather.
=
Burns vs Mitchell, vacant WBO Lightweight title, 17/09/11, venue TBA.
Who was it who was saying the other day that the good old (bad old) days of the WBO title being a virtual Commonwealth/European level belt have gone forever?
It's nice to be right. Doesn't happen often.
17th Sept will be too early, judging by the state of Kevs ear and I'm sure Burns will want a decent rest after his arduous work out!
And anyway, Fwank has already filled his Sept PPV with Degale and Cleverly, he'll surely not want to sacrifice any more of his profits paying any more pesky boxers.
Re: Mitchell v Katsidas part 2
Posted: 20 Jul 2011, 07:05
by Big-Beryl
IMO it would defo be the same result
Re: Mitchell v Katsidas part 2
Posted: 20 Jul 2011, 07:15
by ShadrachSimmo
TJ77 wrote:I think rios first if poss,Katsidis did a right number on him and even if better prepared it could all come flooding back and losing twice to katsidis would un do all his good work far too dangerous to go for that before a world title crack even after the hammering katsidis got at the hands of the ghost but would like to see it one day
If you think Katsidis did a number on Mitchell i think you'd find Rios would do the same only a little quicker.
Re: Mitchell v Katsidas part 2
Posted: 21 Jul 2011, 08:11
by Big-Beryl
ShadrachSimmo wrote:TJ77 wrote:I think rios first if poss,Katsidis did a right number on him and even if better prepared it could all come flooding back and losing twice to katsidis would un do all his good work far too dangerous to go for that before a world title crack even after the hammering katsidis got at the hands of the ghost but would like to see it one day
If you think Katsidis did a number on Mitchell i think you'd find Rios would do the same only a little quicker.
Agreed