Page 2 of 2

Re: Lenny Zappavigna tko r5

Posted: 08 Aug 2011, 04:32
by adamheight
#1 BoXa wrote:
Monty wrote:
#1 BoXa wrote:Dont tell me to read his message again "MONTY'' i read it clearly factious or not its easy to right people of on a forum after they loose. Lenny will be back better than eva hopefully.. If u have never boxed in a ring as an amature or a pro u blantly have no idea ..Ecspecially fans or bums who sit down on a chair at a fight night or at a table all night drinking beer and think there boxing analysts on ESPN all of a sudden..
I did actually box as an amateur pal, I also have a fairly decent pedigree after 15+ years in the pro side of the sport. I can also read clearly and got his message the first time, you might also want to look up the meaning of the word facetious (not "factious"), then you would see that the rest of your post was redundant.
Every body has an opinion Pal i think i am entitled to my own i didn't post these messages to have a go at any one no dis respect to the Pawsey brothers you guys are good blokes good luck with your boxing.. Monty mate i know what Facetious is just left out the "e". Every body this is a boxing forum relax take a chill pill did not join to be having a fight with every one on it.. Peace guys :bow:
are u the same #1 boxa that got banned a couple yrs ago?

Re: Lenny Zappavigna tko r5

Posted: 08 Aug 2011, 04:36
by #1 BoXa
i have never been banned mate i only registered couple of days ago.. :shame:

Re: Lenny Zappavigna tko r5

Posted: 09 Aug 2011, 06:25
by madball1982
Mark pawsey wrote:
madball1982 wrote:You must've been the only one reading it as being a dig at Lenny as opposed to a dig at the 'fans' and 'critics'.

Is the directed at me? well it cant be because I've fought amutear & pro. I don't claim to be a champion or know everything. I will say this Lenny had pretty much no head movement in the fight & he was in with a classy taller boxer, anyway hopefully he will learn from it & he'll be back because, I'm a fan by the way & I'm on the boxers side.

No Mark, it was directed at #1 Boxa. What I was trying to say was that I and probably most readers here, read your comment how it was meant.
Keep in mind though, the above was all I said and it was in direct response to Boxa's, you're commenting more on Boxa's comment.


Anyways, that sounds like I confused it more than cleared it up, oh well.

I knew you were having a joke and most of us did. That's all.