Page 2 of 2
Re: Mundine vs Alvarez Confirmed
Posted: 18 Aug 2011, 09:28
by Beltane
Our "Man" is stepping up in class as Rigoberto is the 9th ranked Mexican at that weight. Pity Mundine didn't try to bring out any of the top 3 ranked Mexicans.
Callen Park is still there and the men in white coats will around to your house if you invest in this next installment of Mundine's PPV retirement fund!
Re: Mundine vs Alvarez Confirmed
Posted: 18 Aug 2011, 18:58
by caveman
Beltane wrote:Our "Man" is stepping up in class as Rigoberto is the 9th ranked Mexican at that weight. Pity Mundine didn't try to bring out any of the top 3 ranked Mexicans.
Callen Park is still there and the men in white coats will around to your house if you invest in this next installment of Mundine's PPV retirement fund!
good one beltane, about rite too
Re: Mundine vs Alvarez Confirmed
Posted: 19 Aug 2011, 17:48
by soulman
Im looking forward to seeing David Aloua fight. Another good strong cruiserweight. Looks like a very exciting division for Australian and Oceania boxing.
Re: Mundine vs Alvarez Confirmed
Posted: 20 Aug 2011, 07:42
by thunderfromdownunder
hearns wrote:thunderfromdownunder wrote:hearns wrote:
Dont forget Diamond and Silver.
Martinez, Katsidis, Mosely, Ortiz,Tszyu,J.M.Marquez, Morales, Casamayor and plenty of others have all fought for Interim Championships. Means to an end.

i think you missed what i was trying to say
Sorry Thunder, I thought you were saying the WBA were a joke with their different champs, and i totally agree but most of the other organisations play the same games.
the main issue here is Cotto is an active champ and so is trout. There is on need for two world champs, let alone three
Re: Mundine vs Alvarez Confirmed
Posted: 20 Aug 2011, 08:16
by dberry
You'd think that the 'regular' world title would be well and truly interim enough to the 'super' world champion, just as you'd think that the goose claiming to be three times 'world interim champion' could clearly see that he hasn't even cracked the top ten of his weight division, let alone be the best. I wouldn't have thought that some one could get so far, and make so much money, by being so very delusional, but I have been proved wrong.
Re: Mundine vs Alvarez Confirmed
Posted: 20 Aug 2011, 09:22
by thunderfromdownunder
dberry wrote:You'd think that the 'regular' world title would be well and truly interim enough to the 'super' world champion, just as you'd think that the goose claiming to be three times 'world interim champion' could clearly see that he hasn't even cracked the top ten of his weight division, let alone be the best. I wouldn't have thought that some one could get so far, and make so much money, by being so very delusional, but I have been proved wrong.
great post

i respect mundines ability. In his day he was world class imo. But the fact is he has never won a genuine world title. But he has fooled so many into believing this myth he has created
Re: Mundine vs Alvarez Confirmed
Posted: 20 Aug 2011, 21:14
by Beltane
Mundine's camp firmly believes that the people will believe a big lie sooner than a little one; and if you repeat it frequently enough people will sooner or later believe it.
But you can't keep going on trying to fool the people all of the time as more and more people are now a wake-up to Mundine's machinations.