Re: Lonsdale Belt poll
Posted: 18 Aug 2011, 14:47
Best looking dog in the line up.jameswilson wrote:Best looking belt in Boxing. End of discussion.
Page 2 of 4
Re: Lonsdale Belt poll
Posted: 18 Aug 2011, 16:19
No it is so called fans like you bringing it downJon Saxon wrote:All you nostalgics should relalise that even the look of this belt is a prime example of why this great sport is in decline & MMA is taking away the new younger demograph (and no matter what you say it's true) and leaving boxing behind.
I think that they should make all the belts in the world look modern ans constantly update them, no forward thnking is what is killing this sport yet you all prefer to sit in your cosey prisons hoping for the same meal everyday. ffs there's a world outside your window.
The past does not define who you are it mearly gives you a badge to pin your hangups on to.
The belt just looks....well.. woefull.
For new fresh young fighters? give them somethng cool not some old antique that isn't even cool in a retro way.
School kids should have a god at redisgning this belt. as the kids are more in touch with the next gen of boxers than we are.
So take in a deep breath suck in your guts and repeat after me.. "change is good"
This thread is nothing to do with beauty and eveything to do with serotonin.
Re: Lonsdale Belt poll
Posted: 18 Aug 2011, 16:36
No it's called how to bring boxing into the new era.taffytoon wrote:No it is so called fans like you bringing it downJon Saxon wrote:All you nostalgics should relalise that even the look of this belt is a prime example of why this great sport is in decline & MMA is taking away the new younger demograph (and no matter what you say it's true) and leaving boxing behind.
I think that they should make all the belts in the world look modern ans constantly update them, no forward thnking is what is killing this sport yet you all prefer to sit in your cosey prisons hoping for the same meal everyday. ffs there's a world outside your window.
The past does not define who you are it mearly gives you a badge to pin your hangups on to.
The belt just looks....well.. woefull.
For new fresh young fighters? give them somethng cool not some old antique that isn't even cool in a retro way.
School kids should have a god at redisgning this belt. as the kids are more in touch with the next gen of boxers than we are.
So take in a deep breath suck in your guts and repeat after me.. "change is good"
This thread is nothing to do with beauty and eveything to do with serotonin.
Bringing what down a belt? or the game?
Re: Lonsdale Belt poll
Posted: 18 Aug 2011, 20:05
I agree with IRLangie25 that the Lonsdale belt is by far the best Boxing belt in the world, it's just sheer class not at all like these lumps of fur and shiney tacky metal substitutes calling themselves (belts)
Just a note the great John Conteh did not win a Lonsdale belt out right, Lennox Lewis did, so did Henry Cooper who we all know won 3 out right.
Am not sure if Chris Finnegan won one out right although he did win 3 fights for the British Title, wpts 15 Eddie Avoth, wpts 15 Roy John and wpts 15 Johnny Frankham, boxrec does not say he won one out right although they do for both Lewis and Cooper, as I said Conteh did not win one out right and thats definite.
Just a note the great John Conteh did not win a Lonsdale belt out right, Lennox Lewis did, so did Henry Cooper who we all know won 3 out right.
Am not sure if Chris Finnegan won one out right although he did win 3 fights for the British Title, wpts 15 Eddie Avoth, wpts 15 Roy John and wpts 15 Johnny Frankham, boxrec does not say he won one out right although they do for both Lewis and Cooper, as I said Conteh did not win one out right and thats definite.
Re: Lonsdale Belt poll
Posted: 19 Aug 2011, 00:40
The BUI are an absolute joke. They should in my eyes be disbanded and a new sanctioning body should be set up to govern boxing and MMA and that isn't run by the people that run the BUI.BigEars wrote:Makes you wonder what the eff the BUI are doing nowdays with their belts, None of them even look the exact same !, the only consistent feature is that their green, big and ugly.slapbangwhallop wrote:2nd!dewipowell wrote:The Lonsdale belt is the most beautiful belt in boxing.
The picture above however truly is a thing of beauty, and although I'm probably biased in this I think aesthetically it is more pleasing that the Londsdale belt. You could make a case for the old 9ct gold Lonsdale belt looking nicer ,it really is so much nicer than the current one, despite not being that drastically different. But the current one is ruined by the fact that Hugh Lowther really was one ugly muthafucka, and his big mug pretty much ruins the belt. Fair play to him for donating the original belts and all though.
Lonsdale Belt
Posted: 19 Aug 2011, 02:03
Question:
A fighter wins the Lonsdale belt, gets to take it home... defends a certain amount of times, gets to keep it. Yeah?
My question is: is the belt they keep the one they won, or is a new one made for them? If they get a new one, does that mean that the Lonsdale belt you see on telly is incredibly old? Or do they make a new one every time someone earns the right to keep the old one?
And I suppose I may as well ask then - if that is true, whose belt has the longest history in terms of bouts until it was won outright?
A fighter wins the Lonsdale belt, gets to take it home... defends a certain amount of times, gets to keep it. Yeah?
My question is: is the belt they keep the one they won, or is a new one made for them? If they get a new one, does that mean that the Lonsdale belt you see on telly is incredibly old? Or do they make a new one every time someone earns the right to keep the old one?
And I suppose I may as well ask then - if that is true, whose belt has the longest history in terms of bouts until it was won outright?
Re: Lonsdale Belt
Posted: 20 Aug 2011, 09:02
Yeah it used to be if a fighter won 3 Birtish title fights... Example: Win the title and 2 defences.@matt___s wrote:Question:
A fighter wins the Lonsdale belt, gets to take it home... defends a certain amount of times, gets to keep it. Yeah?
But now it has been changed to make it more difficult... The fighter must win the title, then defend it 3 times before he keeps the belt.
(I prefer it this way).
I asked your first question to Hughie Russell and he said that the belt he had won, was the one that he kept... So he kept his won belts.@matt___s wrote:My question is: is the belt they keep the one they won, or is a new one made for them? If they get a new one, does that mean that the Lonsdale belt you see on telly is incredibly old? Or do they make a new one every time someone earns the right to keep the old one?
The Lonsdale belt you see on tv is realitively new (depending on when it was made) but a belt may be around of a good number of years (7-8-9 years) changing hands from fighter to fighter and only find a home when someone defends it 3 times and keeps it for good...
Re: Lonsdale Belt
Posted: 20 Aug 2011, 09:06
I honestly don't know, but I suppose you could check it by going through the British title fights records.@matt___s wrote:And I suppose I may as well ask then - if that is true, whose belt has the longest history in terms of bouts until it was won outright?
My guess would be: Carl Froch's belt.
When was there a Super Middleweight Londale Champion who kept the title at that weight before him?
No-one springs to mind for me, at the moment.
Re: Lonsdale Belt poll
Posted: 20 Aug 2011, 14:57
THE LORD lonsdale belt is a historic & a prized coveted antique which is better then any other chintzy looking belt in the world :!:
maybe some prefer big eagles & WWF style belts.
maybe some prefer big eagles & WWF style belts.
Re: Lonsdale Belt poll
Posted: 20 Aug 2011, 14:58
122-6... I have never seen a poll on here so conclusive.
Re: Lonsdale Belt poll
Posted: 20 Aug 2011, 15:29
the 6 people who have said its dated and ugly they must ant have boxed or wanted to b a boxer behoond my wildest dreams was to win a lonsdale belt its the best in the world and its every kids dream which i train in our gym to win it its every young fighters dream all anyone has to do is just ask am and pro fighter s wat belt they want
Re: Lonsdale Belt poll
Posted: 20 Aug 2011, 21:02
I am one of the six who don't find the belt visually appealing. I think the comments about the belt's history, prestige, etc. are irrelevant to the original question as I interpret it. A belt can be unattractive AND of high sentimental value, just as a belt can be attractive and of no sentimental value.
Re: Lonsdale Belt poll
Posted: 21 Aug 2011, 03:29
your talkin out ya arsecrusader wrote:I am one of the six who don't find the belt visually appealing. I think the comments about the belt's history, prestige, etc. are irrelevant to the original question as I interpret it. A belt can be unattractive AND of high sentimental value, just as a belt can be attractive and of no sentimental value.
Re: Lonsdale Belt poll
Posted: 21 Aug 2011, 05:03
tear up wrote:your talkin out ya arsecrusader wrote:I am one of the six who don't find the belt visually appealing. I think the comments about the belt's history, prestige, etc. are irrelevant to the original question as I interpret it. A belt can be unattractive AND of high sentimental value, just as a belt can be attractive and of no sentimental value.
fair enough but it is a prestigous piece of jewellery :!:
you may think sky scrapers are more beautifull then cathedrals & castles.
Re: Lonsdale Belt poll
Posted: 21 Aug 2011, 08:15
hurlock wrote:tear up wrote:your talkin out ya arsecrusader wrote:I am one of the six who don't find the belt visually appealing. I think the comments about the belt's history, prestige, etc. are irrelevant to the original question as I interpret it. A belt can be unattractive AND of high sentimental value, just as a belt can be attractive and of no sentimental value.
fair enough but it is a prestigous piece of jewellery :!:
you may think sky scrapers are more beautifull then cathedrals & castles.
i wonder if the belt is worth more than some fighters got paid for winning the title ??
Re: Lonsdale Belt poll
Posted: 21 Aug 2011, 09:59
Darcy Delaney wrote:wouldnt be a suprise.hurlock wrote:tear up wrote: your talkin out ya arse
fair enough but it is a prestigous piece of jewellery :!:
you may think sky scrapers are more beautifull then cathedrals & castles.
i wonder if the belt is worth more than some fighters got paid for winning the title ??
Re: Lonsdale Belt poll
Posted: 21 Aug 2011, 12:25
Is it worth more melted?
Gold prices are sky high right at the mo.
Gold prices are sky high right at the mo.
Re: Lonsdale Belt poll
Posted: 21 Aug 2011, 12:29
You can't melt down a lonsdale belt, show some respect.
Are you sure your on the right forum?
Are you sure your on the right forum?
Re: Lonsdale Belt poll
Posted: 21 Aug 2011, 15:11
Yeah, he definetly meant to troll here.yid14 wrote:You can't melt down a lonsdale belt, show some respect.
Are you sure your on the right forum?
Re: Lonsdale Belt poll
Posted: 21 Aug 2011, 16:50
I think he is a troll full stop, he just comes on to pick arguments and to antagonise people
Re: Lonsdale Belt poll
Posted: 21 Aug 2011, 17:01
He's fairly harmless, Coco.Coco wrote:I think he is a troll full stop, he just comes on to pick arguments and to antagonise people
It's not like anyone takes him seriously. You can tell he knows nothing about boxing but has a lot of time on his hands. He's probably 40 and still at home.
And that business with "cakes" was amusing. Especially when Saxon posted the PM he'd been sent and the subject was "Knob".
Re: Lonsdale Belt poll
Posted: 21 Aug 2011, 17:20
The Lonsdale belt is worth more than it's weight in gold... (if you pardon the pun).yid14 wrote:You can't melt down a lonsdale belt, show some respect.
Are you sure your on the right forum?
It's a symbol of boxing excellence and some very great fighters have held it in the past.
Re: Lonsdale Belt poll
Posted: 21 Aug 2011, 17:52
Certain sky scrapers are more 'beautiful' than certain cathedrals & castles. Again, aesthetics and history are different issues, although they can be linked in some respects (i.e. different designs, some of which are more attractive than others, were used in different periods). A building/belt may be considered prestigious due to its history, but a prestigious history does not equate to physical attractiveness.hurlock wrote:tear up wrote:your talkin out ya arsecrusader wrote:I am one of the six who don't find the belt visually appealing. I think the comments about the belt's history, prestige, etc. are irrelevant to the original question as I interpret it. A belt can be unattractive AND of high sentimental value, just as a belt can be attractive and of no sentimental value.
fair enough but it is a prestigous piece of jewellery :!:
you may think sky scrapers are more beautifull then cathedrals & castles.
If 'beautiful' was being used in a sentimental sense, then I would not have voted no; winning the Lonsdale belt is a tremendous achievement that every boxer should be proud of. However, it was perceived flaws in the belt’s physical appearance that were articulated in the post that inspired this thread (''I hate it…. it's simply ugly.''), so I don’t believe that the OP is using ‘beautiful’ in a sentimental sense.
Re: Lonsdale Belt poll
Posted: 22 Aug 2011, 14:00
fair enough you find it an unatractive belt. you probably have dodgy brick cladding on your house & a curry house waterfall picture that lights up in your front room you adore,i cant change your taste DD
DDRe: Lonsdale Belt poll
Posted: 23 Aug 2011, 08:40
Keep dreaming Loco,Coco wrote:I think he is a troll full stop, he just comes on to pick arguments and to antagonise people
I watch a show last week were they had two rare charles & diana gold coins but they melted them down as they were worth more as raw gold, it's dated and should be changed as its an ugly ugly bugger.