Page 2 of 2

Re: allegedly - The Schedule?

Posted: 22 Sep 2011, 18:13
by Special1
bengulnaci1 wrote: A few appitiezers then the usual one sided Prospect vs Someone with not chance of winning.

Nah, sorry, doesn't appeal to me.
:TU:

Re: allegedly - The Schedule?

Posted: 22 Sep 2011, 18:45
by magnus
Mixed feelings tbh.

Warren has a relatively large stable of fighters, most of whom are lucky if they've fought more than 3 time a year in the recent past. Joe Selkirk mentioned this in a recent interview. This should mean that prospects like him get to fight more and develop at greater pace.

That said - how long before the all-new WBU (either of them) make an appearance?

Re: allegedly - The Schedule?

Posted: 23 Sep 2011, 02:57
by saturday_kid
Is it only available on Sky?

Re: allegedly - The Schedule?

Posted: 23 Sep 2011, 03:30
by stujones
Question for those who saw the press conference, when is it moving to subcription based. I heard before that the Amateur bill was going to be on free.... so will it be non subscription before then?

Re: allegedly - The Schedule?

Posted: 23 Sep 2011, 03:36
by leforge
stujones wrote:Question for those who saw the press conference, when is it moving to subcription based. I heard before that the Amateur bill was going to be on free.... so will it be non subscription before then?
November I think. The reason its free it will take time to set up subscription also try suck people in.

Re: allegedly - The Schedule?

Posted: 23 Sep 2011, 03:38
by Lenny
I certainly don't think I'll sign up straight away. Sure, I'll watch what they offer us for free to start with but then probably see what their quality is like over the next couple of months. To be honest, if even one or two FW bills were capable of not changing from announcement to fightnight then this would interest me, but as it is do I really want to spend another £120 a year on this?

There sounds like there is a lot of doubt from people on this forum over this channel, not a single casual sports fan will subscribe.