Page 2 of 2
Re: Martin Rogan v Matt Skelton - Belfast, November 12
Posted: 06 Oct 2011, 06:09
by baulks
This is a step backwards. He's nothing to prove or gain from fighting Skelton again. Just a keep busy fight I suppose. Anyway, I thought Skelton was in prison?
Re: Martin Rogan v Matt Skelton - Belfast, November 12
Posted: 06 Oct 2011, 06:41
by slapbangwhallop
Wales wrote:Deno1986 wrote:Wales wrote:Someone has to ask ...... how old is skelton now?
44. He will be 45 in January.
Do you have his birth certificate in the back to prove that ?
I guess he is just going off BoxRec, do you have information that contravene that?
baulks wrote:This is a step backwards. He's nothing to prove or gain from fighting Skelton again. Just a keep busy fight I suppose. Anyway, I thought Skelton was in prison?
Is Skelton really a step back from Werner Kreiskott and Yavor Marinchev??
Rogie deserves a chance to shake off some rust, especially at his age.
Re: Martin Rogan v Matt Skelton - Belfast, November 12
Posted: 06 Oct 2011, 07:52
by Wales
slapbangwhallop wrote:Wales wrote:Deno1986 wrote:
44. He will be 45 in January.
Do you have his birth certificate in the back to prove that ?
I guess he is just going off BoxRec, do you have information that contravene that?
Clearly you dont remember when Skelton first appeared on the scene during an after fight interview Frank Maloney started offering to run to the back to get skeltons birth certificate to prove Skelton was a certain age when information sky had contravined it. Im not even sure if Frank was saying he was something like 32.... I would say any older posters remember this, but it aint really that long ago.
Re: Martin Rogan v Matt Skelton - Belfast, November 12
Posted: 06 Oct 2011, 07:58
by slapbangwhallop
Wales wrote:Clearly you dont remember when Skelton first appeared on the scene during an after fight interview Frank Maloney started offering to run to the back to get skeltons birth certificate to prove Skelton was a certain age when information sky had contravined it. Im not even sure if Frank was saying he was something like 32.... I would say any older posters remember this, but it aint really that long ago.

No I dont remember that. So what age is he? Or what age were SKY saying he was?
Re: Martin Rogan v Matt Skelton - Belfast, November 12
Posted: 06 Oct 2011, 09:37
by Wales
slapbangwhallop wrote:Wales wrote:Clearly you dont remember when Skelton first appeared on the scene during an after fight interview Frank Maloney started offering to run to the back to get skeltons birth certificate to prove Skelton was a certain age when information sky had contravined it. Im not even sure if Frank was saying he was something like 32.... I would say any older posters remember this, but it aint really that long ago.

No I dont remember that. So what age is he? Or what age were SKY saying he was?
Can remember mate, I have a feeling Maloney was saying something like 32, sky 37 .... Frank started saying to the interviewer "Look I'll go an get his birff certifficate from the back if you want" - im pretty sure as it turned out he was older than the alleged certificate wouldv'e said.
Re: Martin Rogan v Matt Skelton - Belfast, November 12
Posted: 06 Oct 2011, 09:45
by Asterix
I think it's a really good fight for both of them. Skelton gets a second chance, and Rogan is able to continue building himself up again. Rogan shouldn't enter into a fight with Fury unless he is ready. He needs to be more active and build up his confidence and momentum.
Re: Martin Rogan v Matt Skelton - Belfast, November 12
Posted: 06 Oct 2011, 10:17
by allahsnackbar
Wales wrote:slapbangwhallop wrote:Wales wrote:Clearly you dont remember when Skelton first appeared on the scene during an after fight interview Frank Maloney started offering to run to the back to get skeltons birth certificate to prove Skelton was a certain age when information sky had contravined it. Im not even sure if Frank was saying he was something like 32.... I would say any older posters remember this, but it aint really that long ago.

No I dont remember that. So what age is he? Or what age were SKY saying he was?
Can remember mate, I have a feeling Maloney was saying something like 32, sky 37 .... Frank started saying to the interviewer "Look I'll go an get his birff certifficate from the back if you want" - im pretty sure as it turned out he was older than the alleged certificate wouldv'e said.
that was actually eugene maloney trying to pull a fast one live on sky.
he was actually stupid enough to think that everyone was stupider than him and would not realise what he was doing.
Re: Martin Rogan v Matt Skelton - Belfast, November 12
Posted: 06 Oct 2011, 11:36
by Wales
allahsnackbar wrote:Wales wrote:slapbangwhallop wrote:

No I dont remember that. So what age is he? Or what age were SKY saying he was?
Can remember mate, I have a feeling Maloney was saying something like 32, sky 37 .... Frank started saying to the interviewer "Look I'll go an get his birff certifficate from the back if you want" - im pretty sure as it turned out he was older than the alleged certificate wouldv'e said.
that was actually eugene maloney trying to pull a fast one live on sky.
he was actually stupid enough to think that everyone was stupider than him and would not realise what he was doing.
Schoolboy error #34 - Thinking everyone is stupider than you.
Re: Martin Rogan v Matt Skelton - Belfast, November 12
Posted: 06 Oct 2011, 14:20
by JimJim2009
allahsnackbar wrote:rogan does seem a bit thick alright but i think he is smart enough to know his limitations. that is why we see him trying for WBU titles and fighting the likes of 44 year old skelton
I wouldn't give him credit for being smart because he is fighting for a WBU title (if that's the case with him vs Skelton, not sure ?), I think its just a lack of options. I'm a big fan of his, and loved his rise through Prizefighter, until he came a cropper against Sexton. Wish he'd have turned pro sooner. Anyway, lack of options, I mean there's no other version of the world title he can fight for, and being blunt I doubt he could win any eliminator for a major belt either, I don't know who holds shite versions like the IBO, IBC etc but persumably somebody does and they will have their own interests at heart, not Rogan's. He doesn't qualify for a shot at the main European title, and probably not for the lesser version either (although he was meant to face Pulev for it I think), and as for the British or Commonwealth titles, he's turned down the opportunity. The WBC international title is between that unbeaten polish guy (forgot his name) who recently flattened McBride, and the ancient Oliver McCall. I'm sure there's other international titles out there but they are probably being "used" to further the career of the holder.
That doesn't really leave an awful lot of options left for Rogan so fighting for the WBU title, if that is what he is doing, is probably the only thing going. In fact when you think about it, its surprising that the WBU wouldn't want somebody higher up the heavyweight food chain to compete for their worthless title. Not having a go at Rogan, he is a real life rocky, but am just being blunt and candid.
Anyway, I wish him well, he was riveting to watch and he deserves some success but realistically he must only have 1 or 2 fights left. Skelton should pack it in, he has no future in the sport whatsoever, he's washed up, shot, finished.
Re: Martin Rogan v Matt Skelton - Belfast, November 12
Posted: 08 Oct 2011, 17:00
by steve689
Skelton's a former WBU champion remember

Re: Martin Rogan v Matt Skelton - Belfast, November 12
Posted: 08 Oct 2011, 17:50
by WildWaylon
Deno1986 wrote:Wales wrote:Someone has to ask ...... how old is skelton now?
44. He will be 45 in January.
He was 39 for a long while LOL.
Re: Martin Rogan v Matt Skelton - Belfast, November 12
Posted: 09 Oct 2011, 05:43
by saturday_kid
Rather them both just retire to be honest, concentrate on the younger heavyweights domestically
Re: Martin Rogan v Matt Skelton - Belfast, November 12
Posted: 12 Oct 2011, 09:40
by Crease
It's a rather pointless fight. Rogan is just going over old ground, repeating his past glories.
Rogan needs to realise that the likes of Willaims, Sprott, Skelton & Francis are the past now... If he wants to get back in with it, then there's the likes of Richard Towers, David Price, John McDermott.
Re: Martin Rogan v Matt Skelton - Belfast, November 12
Posted: 12 Oct 2011, 09:56
by DavidPayne
JimJim2009 wrote:allahsnackbar wrote:rogan does seem a bit thick alright but i think he is smart enough to know his limitations. that is why we see him trying for WBU titles and fighting the likes of 44 year old skelton
I wouldn't give him credit for being smart because he is fighting for a WBU title (if that's the case with him vs Skelton, not sure ?), I think its just a lack of options. I'm a big fan of his, and loved his rise through Prizefighter, until he came a cropper against Sexton. Wish he'd have turned pro sooner. Anyway, lack of options, I mean there's no other version of the world title he can fight for, and being blunt I doubt he could win any eliminator for a major belt either, I don't know who holds shite versions like the IBO, IBC etc but persumably somebody does and they will have their own interests at heart, not Rogan's. He doesn't qualify for a shot at the main European title, and probably not for the lesser version either (although he was meant to face Pulev for it I think), and as for the British or Commonwealth titles, he's turned down the opportunity. The WBC international title is between that unbeaten polish guy (forgot his name) who recently flattened McBride, and the ancient Oliver McCall. I'm sure there's other international titles out there but they are probably being "used" to further the career of the holder.
That doesn't really leave an awful lot of options left for Rogan so fighting for the WBU title, if that is what he is doing, is probably the only thing going. In fact when you think about it, its surprising that the WBU wouldn't want somebody higher up the heavyweight food chain to compete for their worthless title. Not having a go at Rogan, he is a real life rocky, but am just being blunt and candid.
Anyway, I wish him well, he was riveting to watch and he deserves some success but realistically he must only have 1 or 2 fights left. Skelton should pack it in, he has no future in the sport whatsoever, he's washed up, shot, finished.
The good news is. No title is on the line. Amen to that. It is just an interesting fight, of the ilk of Botha v Grant and Holyfield v Nielsen (scratch the last one).
Re: Martin Rogan v Matt Skelton - Belfast, November 12
Posted: 12 Oct 2011, 15:39
by magnus
Crease wrote:It's a rather pointless fight. Rogan is just going over old ground, repeating his past glories.
Rogan needs to realise that the likes of Willaims, Sprott, Skelton & Francis are the past now... If he wants to get back in with it, then there's the likes of Richard Towers, David Price, John McDermott.
Pointless, maybe. But it might actually be fun to watch.
Re: Martin Rogan v Matt Skelton - Belfast, November 12
Posted: 13 Oct 2011, 04:59
by stujones
I'm actually going for a Skelton win here..... I think Skelton took Rogan a tad lightly in fight 1 (which was close at the time of the stoppage) - he's been busier than Rogan and in some of these fights has looked alright.
I remember thinking "oh he has something left" when he fought Swaby in his last "proper" fight. His chin definately aint what is was, but what about Rogan power's with all his injury issue.
Skelton looked poor in his semi final "win" over McBryde in prizefighter, but in his quater final win he looked good and the final was very close.
I just think he has been busier, against better class of opposition and arguably has more left than Rogan.
I think Rogan has missed alot of opportunities and this is a good fight for him. Winner could get a crack at Fury.
Re: Martin Rogan v Matt Skelton - Belfast, November 12
Posted: 13 Oct 2011, 05:20
by BoxingAnalyst
I think this is a horrible fight TBH.